Who had the motive for Maddie's disappearance.

[kizzy]

My opinion is that sums up entirely the raison d'etre of this thread "Who had the motive for Maddie's disappearance." and what has been posted to date confirms that.

For discussion the choice can only be SLUR v INAPPRPRIATNESS.  Dear Lord! who in their right minds tries to initiate discussion specifically on the motive in the disappearance of a child?

Well, obviously someone had to have a motive to make Maddie disappear

Going on circumstantial evidence IMO there is far more in the mcs investigation ...than CBs.

GA has not been proved wrong .....he also has far more support it seems than the mccs in his belifs.

[kizzy]

You really don't understand do you?  It's not possible to discuss the McCanns' motives for staging an abduction without defaming them.  Apparently "defamatory material" will be removed on sight.  But no, instead it is encouraged on this thread.  Either it's OK to defame anyone you fancy or it's not - which is it?

GA wrote a book the mccs although no doubt intentionally ...made the book a best seller.

The book is not defamatory VS

He knew more than anyone the facts of the case.....more than anyone on here.

Seems there is no book on the mccs ....or is there.

[Brietta]

I'm not implicating the McCanns; that happened when the PJ made them arguidos.

"Who had the motive for Maddie's disappearance."

In the land of Casa Pia and the land of night assaults of children in their holiday beds strange that the first port of call without supporting evidence was the parent.

I note the courage of your conviction remains staggering 😉  "Big boy dunnit and ran away!"

[Mr Gray]

I'm not implicating the McCanns; that happened when the PJ made them arguidos.

On flawed evidence... All parents are initially suspects in this sort of case so nothing wrong or incriminating... They are no longer arguido after it as admitted that none of the evidence used to make them arguido was confirmed

[Brietta]

Well, obviously someone had to have a motive to make Maddie disappear

Going on circumstantial evidence IMO there is far more in the mcs investigation ...than CBs.

GA has not been proved wrong .....he also has far more support it seems than the mccs in his belifs.

                        "Who had the motive for Maddie's disappearance."

You started this thread and every post you have made on it reveals your agenda.  Look at the question you asked.

Did you post that question with honesty in your heart ~ or was your intent only to slur the McCanns with the botched conclusions of a disgraced cop on the investigation he messed up?

[Mr Gray]

GA wrote a book the mccs although no doubt intentionally ...made the book a best seller.

The book is not defamatory VS

He knew more than anyone the facts of the case.....more than anyone on here.

Seems there is no book on the mccs ....or is there.

He knew little of the important facts... I know more and can prove it...

[Mr Gray]

Well, obviously someone had to have a motive to make Maddie disappear

Going on circumstantial evidence IMO there is far more in the mcs investigation ...than CBs.

GA has not been proved wrong .....he also has far more support it seems than the mccs in his belifs.

If you think GA has more support in his beliefs... You are deluded. He has been proved wrong on the evidence he has relied on

[Brietta]

GA wrote a book the mccs although no doubt intentionally ...made the book a best seller.

The book is not defamatory VS

He knew more than anyone the facts of the case.....more than anyone on here.

Seems there is no book on the mccs ....or is there.

                             "Who had the motive for Maddie's disappearance."
Now you come to mention it ~
When looking for a motive the first question which springs to mind is "Cui Bono?" Which could well be translated as who stood to make the most money from this?

The example of money being made by detectives in Portugal from books on missing children is a given.  Joana being a prime example.  Therefore considering money as a motive must be a consideration.

And who made more money from Madeleine than Amaral? 

[kizzy]

"Who had the motive for Maddie's disappearance."

In the land of Casa Pia and the land of night assaults of children in their holiday beds strange that the first port of call without supporting evidence was the parent.

I note the courage of your conviction remains staggering 😉  "Big boy dunnit and ran away!"

assaults of children in their holiday beds strange that the first port of call without supporting evidence was the parent.

Do you mean as suspects .............because generally, I would have thought parents have to be ruled out.

And then when/if they are cleared ...end of suspicion.

Soz if got wrong end of stick for your point B

[Vertigo Swirl]

GA wrote a book the mccs although no doubt intentionally ...made the book a best seller.

The book is not defamatory VS

He knew more than anyone the facts of the case.....more than anyone on here.

Seems there is no book on the mccs ....or is there.

Pardon?

[Brietta]

assaults of children in their holiday beds strange that the first port of call without supporting evidence was the parent.

Do you mean as suspects .............because generally, I would have thought parents have to be ruled out.

And then when/if they are cleared ...end of suspicion.

Soz if got wrong end of stick for your point B

                         "Who had the motive for Maddie's disappearance?"
I think you have got exactly the right end of the stick regarding my point - precisely as I have yours.

[Wonderfulspam]

You tell me - you're the moderator around here.  I'm thoroughly confused about what is and isn't allowed on here these days (you seem ok with the idea of me examining Murat's possible motive for example).  I will say however that it's quite hard to destroy the good name of a convicted rapist, thief and child molester and further than it's already been been destroyed by his own proven actions.

Yes, yes, what a terrible man Brueckner is.
He didn't abduct & murder Maddie though, that much is obvious.

[Wonderfulspam]

                                 "Who had the motive for Maddie's disappearance."

Your concern for the rights of a career criminal convicted of brutal rape and child sexual abuse does you proud on this a "Justice" Forum.

Though one struggles with the suggestion Brueckner has been "defamed" here.

What isn't OK is to defame innocent people and I regret that rather than recognising the posts on this thread and objecting to it you appear to condone as well as contribute.  Strange one that.

Brueckner is innocent.

[Brietta]

You tell me - you're the moderator around here.  I'm thoroughly confused about what is and isn't allowed on here these days (you seem ok with the idea of me examining Murat's possible motive for example).  I will say however that it's quite hard to destroy the good name of a convicted rapist, thief and child molester and further than it's already been been destroyed by his own proven actions.

He seems to have been well known in certain circles in his adopted home town Luz.  People such as he were apparently priority interviewees.  Nobody interviewed him despite him being on the police radar.  Why not?  Why did it take until 2013 and Operation Grange to locate his phone number in evidence from 2007?

Motive and Cui Bono comes into it yet again.  The most obvious here being money.

[kizzy]

                             "Who had the motive for Maddie's disappearance."
Now you come to mention it ~
When looking for a motive the first question which springs to mind is "Cui Bono?" Which could well be translated as who stood to make the most money from this?

The example of money being made by detectives in Portugal from books on missing children is a given.  Joana being a prime example.  Therefore considering money as a motive must be a consideration.

And who made more money from Madeleine than Amaral?

Not really as at the beginning who would have thought this was going to turn out as it did.

I don't think for one minute the book would have taken off [as a best seller] if it wasn't for the mccs suing GA.

I would say most then bought the book in support of GA, I did it myself although it was in Portuguese.

IMO the reason for him writing the book was in a way to be a voice for Maddie.

He truly believes the abduction was faked....and the mccs had a motive to do that.

Answer to your other post,...

I truly believe in my heart that the mccs are involved in Maddie's disappearance....otherwise there is no way ever I would still be on here.

As for the slur, I don't believe their story...I have no sympathy at all.

There is nothing wrong with following your principles...or beliefs if you truly believe them to be right.