Brueckner charged with sexual offences in cases unrelated to Madeleine

[Brietta]

At the moment;

"The responsible criminal chamber will now examine in a so-called interim procedure whether the indictment will be admitted and whether the main proceedings will be opened."
https://www.rnd.de/panorama/fall-maddie-anklage-gegen-hauptverdaechtigen-christian-b-prozess-nicht-vor-2023-K3YQD3SUOENLJKF4GP27OPGUUQ.html

So a trial for all the offences he's accused of is not yet the certainty you seem to think it is.

Going on precedent, I think your hopes regarding Brueckner evading the scrutiny of German justice may well be forlorn ones.  He is well within the process already.

[Eleanor]

Going on precedent, I think your hopes regarding Brueckner evading the scrutiny of German justice may well be forlorn ones.  He is well within the process already.

And of course, Germany has no axe to grind.

[Wonderfulspam]

Going on precedent, I think your hopes regarding Brueckner evading the scrutiny of German justice may well be forlorn ones.  He is well within the process already.

When & where exactly did G express any hope Brueckner evades justice?

Could you highlight the relevant passage in her post for me, because I couldn't see it?

[Brietta]

And of course, Germany has no axe to grind.

And they have always recognised that they faced a long drawn out investigative process as it has proved to be.


15 years after the disappearance of Madeleine McCann in Portugal, German investigators give little hope for a quick clarification of the fate of the girl.
"The investigation will take some time," said Hans Christian Wolters of the public Prosecutor's office in Braunschweig, the German press Agency. An end to the investigations is currently not in sight.
https://www.rnd.de/panorama/der-mysterioese-fall-maddie-mccann-chronik-einer-tragoedie-ORS45TDJ5JCWPJW4C2ZZ5QRLPU.html

[Wonderfulspam]

No bias here. I'd still think she was a bit stupid for leaving the door unlocked in the first place though.

[Anthro]

No bias here. I'd still think she was a bit stupid for leaving the door unlocked in the first place though.

It’s like saying a woman who wears a mini skirt is ‘inviting’ sexual assault. Isn’t your argument a bit too simplistic?

[Wonderfulspam]

It’s like saying a woman who wears a mini skirt is ‘inviting’ sexual assault. Isn’t your argument a bit too simplistic?

Well, I haven't said any such thing.
But if mini skirts had locks they'd probably have them for a reason.

[Eleanor]

It’s like saying a woman who wears a mini skirt is ‘inviting’ sexual assault. Isn’t your argument a bit too simplistic?

Spammy is a simple man.

[Wonderfulspam]

Spammy is a simple man.

How dare you assume my gender identity.

[Wonderfulspam]

Anyway, I've been balanced here.
I would fully support the right of both Diane M & Hazel B to have used lethal force to defend themselves in their home invasion situation. I think these two cases are prime examples of why women should be allowed to possess fire arms & should sleep with them under their pillow.

[Eleanor]

How dare you assume my gender identity.

Sorry.  Spammy is a simpleton.

[Wonderfulspam]

Sorry.  Spammy is a simpleton.

Well now you're just insulting simpletons.

[Brietta]

It’s like saying a woman who wears a mini skirt is ‘inviting’ sexual assault. Isn’t your argument a bit too simplistic?

In my heart of hearts I cannot believe that the members who have come out so firmly on behalf of rapist and paedophile Brueckner, would throw their support behind him under any circumstances other than the fact Brueckner is the prime suspect in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.

That in itself I think should raise some element of self questioning, the answers to which should rightly provoke contemplation.

[Wonderfulspam]

In my heart of hearts I cannot believe that the members who have come out so firmly on behalf of rapist and paedophile Brueckner, would throw their support behind him under any circumstances other than the fact Brueckner is the prime suspect in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.

That in itself I think should raise some element of self questioning, the answers to which should rightly provoke contemplation.

Nobody here 'supports' him. OK? The guy is a rapist & paedophile. Nobody here supports rape or paedophilia (apart from spam when he is just wumming) it's just that some of us see no good reason to believe he abducted Maddie, or murdered her, or that Maddie was ever abducted in the first place.

[G-Unit]

Going on precedent, I think your hopes regarding Brueckner evading the scrutiny of German justice may well be forlorn ones.  He is well within the process already.

I have no hopes either way, but I do think people are getting over-excited and treating possibilities as foregone conclusions.