Brueckner charged with sexual offences in cases unrelated to Madeleine

[Vertigo Swirl]

Whatever else happens Germany have exposed a serial paedophile and rapist.  Portugal could have done this but they couldn't be bothered.

Very true.  They couldn’t be arsed to properly investigate these crimes and have been shamed by German and British determination to get justice for these victims.

[Gertrude]

I am content to wait for the evidence to be presented regarding the current case load Brueckner faces.  While awaiting the charges with which we are told he will be indicted in relation to whatever he will be accused of doing to Madeleine.

We have had over fifteen years of sceptic speculation which has led exactly nowhere.  Time now to move over and allow the evidence of which we are told there is plenty, to do the talking.

Everyone is speculating here as far as I can see because none of us knows what the evidence is. Members on here have guessed at what the evidence might be.  Personally, I don't see any need to 'move over' if what you mean by that is to stop discussing it. 

[Gertrude]

There is no way he killed her in the apartment within the available time frame to make the dog alerts viable so I think it’s safe to discount that idea.  We don’t know for certain that he had never committed crimes against people he removed from a location only that he has not so far been charged with any crimes of abduction.  Let’s not forget the McCanns are frequently suspected of doing all sorts of heinous crimes they presumably never would have committed prior to PdL so IMO it’s a bogus argument to say any given crime committed must have a precedent.

I agree with your first point, we don't know what other crimes he may have committed but I'm not saying he has to have a similar preceding crime to have been an abductor, just that the pattern seems to be so different in the McCann case, so how at all likely is it? Of course any evidence putting him actually at the scene would add to the possibility that it is what he did. At the moment there doesn't seem to be any evidence that puts him in 5a.
   You could also use your logic to say we don't know if the McCanns or associates ever committed any crimes before they were suspected.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I agree with your first point, we don't know what other crimes he may have committed but I'm not saying he has to have a similar preceding crime to have been an abductor, just that the pattern seems to be so different in the McCann case, so how at all likely is it? Of course any evidence putting him actually at the scene would add to the possibility that it is what he did. At the moment there doesn't seem to be any evidence that puts him in 5a.
   You could also use your logic to say we don't know if the McCanns or associates ever committed any crimes before they were suspected.

Of course you could.  However they haven’t been charged with any crimes at all and this thread is about Bruckner so…

[Gertrude]

Of course you could.  However they haven’t been charged with any crimes at all and this thread is about Bruckner so…

You brought up the McCanns in response to my replies on evidence on Brueckner, saying don't forget them being accused of all kinds of crimes. I wouldn't have mentioned them otherwise.

[Eleanor]

Topic.  Please.

[Wonderfulspam]

I am content to wait for the evidence to be presented regarding the current case load Brueckner faces.  While awaiting the charges with which we are told he will be indicted in relation to whatever he will be accused of doing to Madeleine.

We have had over fifteen years of sceptic speculation which has led exactly nowhere.  Time now to move over and allow the evidence of which we are told there is plenty, to do the talking.

If you're waiting for Brueckner to be charged with anything relating to Maddie then you're going to be waiting a long time.
For the foreseeable future as it happens.
Not sure if I've mentioned that before.
Wolters has, but it hasn't quite sunk in has it.

[Vertigo Swirl]

You brought up the McCanns in response to my replies on evidence on Brueckner, saying don't forget them being accused of all kinds of crimes. I wouldn't have mentioned them otherwise.

Amaral seems to think Brückner is the perfect patsy.  Why do you think he considers him perfect, if not because he thinks he has the profile of someone who could abduct, rape and murder a child?

[Wonderfulspam]

This development represents the death knell for him ever being charged with MM's disappearance.
It's the booby prize; a face-saver. The wooden spoon.
Bloody good try though, I'll give them that.

...right, who's next? Murat again?

No. I think you must have been away.
McCann believers have convinced themselves Brueckner is being charged with crimes against Maddie, following the Behan rape trial. Wolters himself hasn't suggested any such thing mind.
In fact, he can't see Brueckner being charged anytime in the foreseeable future, was his most recent admission. But for reasons known only to believers, they're still pretending it isn't so.

[Mr Gray]

Everyone is speculating here as far as I can see because none of us knows what the evidence is. Members on here have guessed at what the evidence might be.  Personally, I don't see any need to 'move over' if what you mean by that is to stop discussing it.

We know there is enough to charge. Several posters have been dismissive  and insulting towards Wolters but now they have to accept his credibility.. And he's 100 % sure CB murdered Maddie

[Wonderfulspam]

We know there is enough to charge. Several posters have been dismissive  and insulting towards Wolters but now they have to accept his credibility.. And he's 100 % sure CB murdered Maddie

No, Wolters 'claims' there is enough to charge, re Maddie.
Notice the difference?

[Gertrude]

Amaral seems to think Brückner is the perfect patsy.  Why do you think he considers him perfect, if not because he thinks he has the profile of someone who could abduct, rape and murder a child?

Without getting into detail, I think any sexual deviant who was in the vague area could be made a patsy if that's what someone was determined to do, I doubt specific profiling would come into it much.... but I'm going to stick to the topic of this thread, as Brietta requested not long ago.

[Anthro]

We know there is enough to charge. Several posters have been dismissive  and insulting towards Wolters but now they have to accept his credibility.. And he's 100 % sure CB murdered Maddie

Also, it’s clear the German police charge no-one unless they think they'll get a conviction.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Without getting into detail, I think any sexual deviant who was in the vague area could be made a patsy if that's what someone was determined to do, I doubt specific profiling would come into it much.... but I'm going to stick to the topic of this thread, as Brietta requested not long ago.

There’s patsys and then there’s perfect patsys.  Is discussing CB’s suitability as a suspect in this case off topic?  OK, what else can we talk about?

[Eleanor]

There’s patsys and then there’s perfect patsys.  Is discussing CB’s suitability as a suspect in this case off topic?  OK, what else can we talk about?

Discussing Brueckner as a Patsy is fine by me.