What a load of facetious nonsense but carry on believing what you want to believe, which seems to be that the police and the witness are all lying to stitch up some nonentity petty crimnal as the perpetrator of one of the most notorious crimes of the 21st century.
Not fitting up as such but both sides taking advantage of the opportunities presented to them. Busching would have known that the information he offered would need to have been a bit special to get him out of the particular bind he was in and the Greek police on the other hand I’m sure wouldn’t have been adverse to been seen to be playing an active part in possibly bring to justice one of the most sought after criminals in the world. Quid pro quo if you will.
BTW you didn’t answer my question. Why do you think that Busching held on to the information he eventually gave the police for so many years….also why do you believe a man who had so little thought for Madeleine and her parents that he denied them a resolution to their agony for years and years? Surely a man like that and what he says should be given no credence by any right thinking person?