The Remit of SY

[Vertigo Swirl]

Haven’t the PJ already said that the BKA revealed no evidence to them that suggested that Brueckner was Madeleine’s abductor? Ah yes….

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8929765/Portuguese-Madeleine-McCann-cops-claim-German-police-NO-evidence.html

That’s completely different to what you stated which was that the PJ KNOW CB didn’t do it.  You do understand the difference don’t you?  I can get my crayons out if necessary…

[faithlilly]

Point One: of all the dozens of lowlifes making claims about what they know about this case why pick Busching’s evidence re: CB as the one to hang a multi million euro investigation on?  What sets him apart from all the others?
Point Two:(which clearly went right over your head) if every police force in the world is so desperate to solve this case a la the Greeks and the Germans as you have claimed, then how much more desperate would the Met be to have this all put to bed, and embrace the convenient patsy, having spent years an millions on this investigation and thus confirming they were right re: stranger abduction all along!   Point is, your logical is faulty re your claim of desperation on the part of the Greeks and the Germans.  In any case, if the Germans were so utterly desperate to nail CB for the crime that they would engage in duplicity and bribery to achieve their aims then what’s stopping them going the whole hog and getting CB into court on bogus evidence?

Again why do you think that Busching waited until he was arrested for people trafficking before informing the police of a conversation that happened many, many years before?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Again why do you think that Busching waited until he was arrested for people trafficking before informing the police of a conversation that happened many, many years before?

I’ve already answered this question once this evening, here is my answer again: I DON’T KNOW.  It’s not relevant to my point.

[faithlilly]

I have no idea, but do you now understand why his evidence in the rape case was considered credible?  If no, I can draw pictures (to use one of your own favourite put downs).

TBH I don’t understand why Busching’s evidence was thought credible. There was no tangible evidence that the tape ever existed, the elderly lady who was raped wasn’t on the alleged tape and there appears to have been no investigation by any police force to find out who the women on the alleged tape were.

In fact in Britain I’m not sure that Busching’s evidence would even be deemed admissible in a trial.

[Vertigo Swirl]

TBH I don’t understand why Busching’s evidence was thought credible. There was no tangible evidence that the tape ever existed, the elderly lady who was raped wasn’t on the alleged tape and there appears to have been no investigation by any police force to find out who the women on the alleged tape were.

In fact in Britain I’m not sure that Busching’s evidence would even be deemed admissible in a trial.

Tsk, you still don’t get it.  Oh well you can lead a horse to water and all that…

[faithlilly]

That’s completely different to what you stated which was that the PJ KNOW CB didn’t do it.  You do understand the difference don’t you?  I can get my crayons out if necessary…

Messily worded…my bad.

The PJ had seen no evidence that suggested that Brueckner was the one who abducted Madeleine.

There you go.

[faithlilly]

I’ve already answered this question once this evening, here is my answer again: I DON’T KNOW.  It’s not relevant to my point.

It is absolutely relevant…in fact it is the most relevant question in relation to Busching’s evidence.

If you can’t see that then there really is no hope for you.

[faithlilly]

Tsk, you still don’t get it.  Oh well you can lead a horse to water and all that…

I think it’s you that’s allowing yourself to be lead…down the garden path.

[misty]

TBH I don’t understand why Busching’s evidence was thought credible. There was no tangible evidence that the tape ever existed, the elderly lady who was raped wasn’t on the alleged tape and there appears to have been no investigation by any police force to find out who the women on the alleged tape were.

In fact in Britain I’m not sure that Busching’s evidence would even be deemed admissible in a trial.

There was an appeal in 2019 regarding the teen allegedly seen on video.
https://www.focus.de/panorama/welt/zeugen-sollen-sich-umgehend-bei-polizei-melden-sexualstraftat-vor-rund-18-jahren-in-portugal-bka-sucht-opfer-von-mysterioesem-fall_id_11391399.html?fbclid=IwAR3bGkbwCnHv_k-RNhxeT1hoU9QZF7jiDvcHRmJ4PJfCwvo7vqHCgGrjh2A

[G-Unit]

I find it rewarding to source what anyone is actually saying ~ which is why I am classing your rather bizarre post as coming from the same stable as the one I thought rather strange posted by Barrier.

Exactly what information hot from the German press do you think has contributed to you being more enlightened than anyone else.

Do share 👀

Released October 2022.

Everything the Germans have claimed they knew seems to have been exaggerated.

[faithlilly]

Released October 2022.

Everything the Germans have claimed they knew seems to have been exaggerated.

A suspicion not so much built with concrete but shifting sand.

[Vertigo Swirl]

It is absolutely relevant…in fact it is the most relevant question in relation to Busching’s evidence.

If you can’t see that then there really is no hope for you.

Explain why.  Is it a fact that all you have to do when charged with a crime is to falsely dob some old acquaintance in it wrt to any unsolved crime in order to get off with a lighter sentence? 

[Vertigo Swirl]

I think it’s you that’s allowing yourself to be lead…down the garden path.

In what way?  Do explain.  Remember we are talking about Busching’s evidence being credible wrt to the rape conviction.  Also remember, I’m not the only one who thought so as I believe the culprit got 7 years.  Off you go, explain.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Released October 2022.

Everything the Germans have claimed they knew seems to have been exaggerated.

How do you work that out from your link?

[faithlilly]

Explain why.  Is it a fact that all you have to do when charged with a crime is to falsely dob some old acquaintance in it wrt to any unsolved crime in order to get off with a lighter sentence?

Sometimes yes.