The Evidence Madeleine Was Taken In A Criminal Act By A Stranger.

[Wonderfulspam]

I want to have a serious & sensible discussion about what possible evidence that Madeleine was taken in a criminal act by a stranger
the three expert investigative forces could have?

It's supporters who are disrupting this discussion by failing to come up with any suggestions.

[jassi]

Can you imagine finding your daughter missing?   Have you ever tried to put yourself in the place of Kate a mother who couldn't find her daughter?

You talk as though she should have acted as if she was a Police woman 'better not touch the window because of finger prints'  'better shut the window'  'don't go into the apartment its all evidence'.    Kate wouldn't have been thinking any of this her main course of action was to search for her child.

It's great to look at it with no compassion  isn't it,   knowing what happened next.

But of course she didn't search. Only the men did that.

Only much later when there was no one around did she venture out, though goodness knows for what purpose at that time in the morning.

[Brietta]

I no longer really care.  There is nothing to indicte The Mccains and I don't have to worry about this,  beyond worrying about the mental state of those who wish to do so.

There is something really horrible going on which is mostly to do with their own inadequiecese, which is really sad. Especially since there is nothing that I can do about this.

There are a million and one internet platforms set up specifically to trash Madeleine McCann's case.  I gave up wondering why a very long time ago.

Suffice it to say only the persistence of her parents which kept the focus on Madeleine and the evidence has led to any chance of finding the truth.

There are individuals who can't stand the thought of that for some reason best known to themselves.

It is interesting though to watch the process first hand as they chip away at this the remaining of the one or two platforms still able to post and debate the alternative view to the other cess pits hoatching on the internet.

Two words spring to mind - "sad" and "pathetic".

[Wonderfulspam]

There are a million and one internet platforms set up specifically to trash Madeleine McCann's case.  I gave up wondering why a very long time ago.

Suffice it to say only the persistence of her parents which kept the focus on Madeleine and the evidence has led to any chance of finding the truth.

There are individuals who can't stand the thought of that for some reason best known to themselves.

It is interesting though to watch the process first hand as they chip away at this the remaining of the one or two platforms still able to post and debate the alternative view to the other cess pits hoatching on the internet.

Two words spring to mind - "sad" and "pathetic".

Nothing to add to the discussion & thread topic from you either then. Resorting to throwing out insults rather than suggesting what possible evidence the three police forces could have.

[jassi]

Nothing to add to the discussion & thread topic from you either then. Resorting to throwing out insults rather than suggesting what possible evidence the three police forces could have.

Its what happens when they have no answer, but feel compelled to post anyway.

[Eleanor]

Who appointed you as arbiter of alleged inadequacies .

This Forum.  Whether you like it or not.

[Eleanor]

Its what happens when they have no answer, but feel compelled to post anyway.

Like you, you mean, who never has anything to say beyond agreeing with rubbish.

[Wonderfulspam]

Its what happens when they have no answer, but feel compelled to post anyway.

Supporters here are convinced SY have evidence of abduction, yet can't seem to give a single suggestion as to what possible evidence there could be? I find this rather strange. A similar thing happened on my thread about the possible evidence against Christian Brueckner, as it happens.

[jassi]

Like you, you mean, who never has anything to say beyond agreeing with rubbish.

Yet another insult. You really are desperate.

[Wonderfulspam]

Yet another insult. You really are desperate.

I count more insults than answers so far.

[Eleanor]

Yet another insult. You really are desperate.

Not a chance.  But you wouldn't understand the difference.

[Wonderfulspam]

Right, enough bickering & insults now. We've ran into 6 pages now but still only have 2 suggestions. Let's get back to the topic at hand & have a serious & sensible discussion about.....

The Evidence Madeleine Was Taken In A Criminal Act By A Stranger

The suggestions thus far are...

1) The McCanns claim that Madeleine was abducted

2) An allegedly open window, that had Kate's prints on it

Members are welcome to add to this list.

[jassi]

Does opportunity count as evidence ?
Redwood said that in his opinion there was opportunity to commit an abduction.

[Wonderfulspam]

Does opportunity count as evidence ?
Redwood said that in his opinion there was opportunity to commit an abduction.

That just means in his opinion she could have been abducted.  But that would depend on whether or not Madeleine was actually alive & in her bed that night, available to be abducted in the first place. I can't see any way to confirm that she actually was, other than by presuming the McCanns account to be entirely truthful & accurate. It seems that is exactly what SY have done, & so it's little wonder to me really why they still can't find the abductor.

[jassi]

That just means in his opinion she could have been abducted.  But that would depend on whether or not Madeleine was actually alive & in her bed that night, available to be abducted in the first place. I can't see any way to confirm that she actually was, other than by presuming the McCanns account to be entirely truthful & accurate. It seems that is exactly what SY have done, & so it's little wonder to me really why they still can't find the abductor.

And yet they chose to base the whole investigation on that opinion, even though I seem to recall Redwood saying there were alternative views - or something to that effect. 

Who decided which opinion to go with ?  At what level was that decided - DCI or higher up.