Gerry and Jez chat while Jane walks by. Seconds later she spots Tannerman!

[lordpookles]

Yes Tannerman had of course, but they still have that efit up there with a small explanation. But no Smithman anywhere...

[faithlilly]

Yes Tannerman had of course, but they still have that efit up there with a small explanation. But no Smithman anywhere...

I have the feeling LP that the ignoring of the efits, which the McCanns had of course ignored for over five years previously, is the clearest sign that they and SY are not remotely singing from the same hymsheet !

[lordpookles]

Maybe. Looking at twitter they seem to post quite regularly the efits of Smithman. Perhaps the site isn't updated much anymore. It could also mean Smithman may now be accounted for. I wonder, if ever, we will get a progress report from SY. Crimewatch often do an update...

[Anna]

Anyone notice there is now no mention of smithman anywhere on findmadeleine.com site? Could that mean he's been ruled out as well as tannerman? Although tannerman efit is still there...

There is a list of witnesses 1-5 If you click on 5 you will see the smithman video.

[DCI]

There is a list of witnesses 1-5 If you click on 5 you will see the smithman video.

Thanks Anna, that's what I was looking for last night!

[faithlilly]

There is a list of witnesses 1-5 If you click on 5 you will see the smithman video.

Is this an extract from the documentary produced by Emma Loach which shows Smithman in the same clothes as Tannerman was shown wearing and also carrying the child not in the way the Smiths described but as Tanner described ?

Tell me Anna what use is a reenactment that bears little, if any, resemblance to the witness statements ?

[Anna]

Is this an extract from the documentary produced by Emma Loach which shows Smithman in the same clothes as Tannerman was shown wearing and also carrying the child not in the way the Smiths described but as Tanner described ?

Tell me Anna what use is a reenactment that bears little, if any, resemblance to the witness statements ?

I didn't watch the video, Faith. I only noticed that it was there and gave the information, for anyone interested .

However I must admit that I have little faith in 2 e fits that were made up from 2 descriptions given by 2 people, who said they could not recognise Smithman from a photograph......The e fits are almost photographs.

[Wonderfulspam]

I didn't watch the video, Faith. I only noticed that it was there and gave the information, for anyone interested .

However I must admit that I have little faith in 2 e fits that were made up from 2 descriptions given by 2 people, who said they could not recognise Smithman from a photograph......The e fits are almost photographs.

I have little faith in the 2/4 differing witness statements, given by the parents, who come across as being a pair of massive liars, myself.

Just me I spose.

[faithlilly]

I didn't watch the video, Faith. I only noticed that it was there and gave the information, for anyone interested .

However I must admit that I have little faith in 2 e fits that were made up from 2 descriptions given by 2 people, who said they could not recognise Smithman from a photograph......The e fits are almost photographs.

I believe one of the efits was based on Mary Smith's description. Did she say she wouldn't recognise Smithman ?  Further if the efits carry such scant credibility why are SY using them in a bid to catch Madeleine's alleged abductor ? Are they simply clutching at straws ?

[Anna]

I believe one of the efits was based on Mary Smith's description. Did she say she wouldn't recognise Smithman ?  Further if the efits carry such scant credibility why are SY using them in a bid to catch Madeleine's alleged abductor ? Are they simply clutching at straws ?

Which one of the two, was my M Smith's?......That would be the most likely, to have some resemblance, as M Smith, most definitely said, that he would not recognize him from a photo.

So, which was which do you think? Not too difficult to work out really.

 Why are the SY using these e fits? What else do they have? This is my opinion only, Faith.

[faithlilly]

Which one of the two, was my M Smith's?......That would be the most likely, to have some resemblance, as M Smith, most definitely said, that he would not recognize him from a photo.

So, which was which do you think? Not too difficult to work out really.

 Why are the SY using these e fits? What else do they have? This is my opinion only, Faith.

And thank you for replying Anna. Am I correct in surmising that you don't have much faith in SY to crack the case ?

[Anna]

And thank you for replying Anna. Am I correct in surmising that you don't have much faith in SY to crack the case ?

I did not say that, SY, could not crack the case, Faith.

I do not however, believe it will be in any way connected to, Smithman, if they do.
 
We will have to wait and see and of course I might very possibly be wrong.

There is so much unexplained about this case and while the secrecy laws are in place, we are unlikely to receive news of any progress in the investigation.

[pegasus]

"... they were stood with G's back to the building near to the gate and J facing him. Rua Dr Agostino was about 10-15 meters to his right and the pathway leading to the front of the apartment blocks about 5 meters to his left ..."
SOURCE: Leic Police visit JW 11 May 2007, VOL 13, P3409.
I have drawn the 5 metres. How well does this match the chat position in Mr A's V da M film

[G-Unit]

In Jeremy's first interview by UK police he drew a sketch which puts the conversation on the corner of the path.

[mercury]

In Jeremy's first interview by UK police he drew a sketch which puts the conversation on the corner of the path.

He said he met GM near the stairs of a ground floor flat and there was a gate leading to the stairs. That drawing is not to scale at all and doesn't IMO show that JW meant he met him next to the alleyway, and he never said he met him by the alleyway.