Any news on JB's 2025 CCRC application?

[The General]

Ha ha, very good April, very good indeed!

Never mind replying to the low hanging fruit, answer my questions.
(Not you, April, the concept of Blogsie replying to anything other than the important issues)

[APRIL]

Never mind replying to the low hanging fruit, answer my questions.
(Not you, April, the concept of Blogsie replying to anything other than the important issues)

I hear you, General. Thank-you

[Joe Blogs]

No they do NOT, nothing like and you've been shown they don't, yet you're still rabbiting on about it.

Negative, Myster, they do match!
As I have said, its all explained in Bamber vs the doc maker in the articles 'the Aga evidence' parts one and two!

[Myster]

Negative, Myster, they do match!
As I have said, its all explained in Bamber vs the doc maker in the articles 'the Aga evidence' parts one and two!

Back to square one for you, docmaker and all the other gullibles. His appeal has been rejected...

https://theupsetterstrikes.substack.com/p/bamboozled

[Joe Blogs]

No I don’t and the two are not remotely comparable.  You’ve already conceded that the mark caused on the pig skin by the largest knob on the aga didn’t even cause a burn on the skin, just an indentation, whereas the corresponding mark on Nevill’s body was smaller and the worst of the three marks judging by the photo.  I am entirely correct when I say that it’s an aga theory, not aga evidence.

Well it is evidence really, Vertigo! It is sitting with the CCRC being concidered as we speak.

[Myster]

Well it is evidence really, Vertigo! It is sitting with the CCRC being concidered as we speak.

It's been rejected, can you not read?  An obviously biased statement from his supporters...

[APRIL]

Well it is evidence really, Vertigo! It is sitting with the CCRC being concidered as we speak.

Whilst you may call it 'evidence'. It MAY be "sitting with the CCRC............" Whether, or not, it's "being considered" is an entirely different question. It might end up being recycled, ending up as one of you loo rolls.

[Joe Blogs]

Back to square one for you, docmaker and all the other gullibles. His appeal has been rejected...

https://theupsetterstrikes.substack.com/p/bamboozled

What on earth does that mean, Myster? Is the CCRC taking a break from looking at JBs submission till sometime in the future?
If so, they probably haven't looked at the Aga evidence yet! Sneaky!

[Joe Blogs]

It's been rejected, can you not read?  An obviously biased statement from his supporters...

Ah, thanks, Myster!
So just the phone call and the silencers have been concidered then?
So it isn't so much a refusal, more of an update saying that the submission hasn't yet reached the thresshold to refer with the first three or four points that have been looked at?

[Myster]

What on earth does that mean, Myster? Is the CCRC taking a break from looking at JBs submission till sometime in the future?
If so, they probably haven't looked at the Aga evidence yet! Sneaky!

"To endless years the same"... mushy overcooked sprouts and lumpy gravy for Christmas Dinner in countless years to come.

They've examined your tired old hobbyhorse and carted it off to the knacker's yard (Issue 3)...

https://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/new-ccrc-submission

[Joe Blogs]

Whilst you may call it 'evidence'. It MAY be "sitting with the CCRC............" Whether, or not, it's "being considered" is an entirely different question. It might end up being recycled, ending up as one of you loo rolls.

Well it seems the Aga evidence hasn't been concidered yet, April, going by the articles that Myster has posted.

[Joe Blogs]

"To endless years the same"... mushy overcooked sprouts and lumpy gravy for Christmas Dinner in countless years to come.

They've examined your tired old hobbyhorse and carted it off to the knacker's yard (Issue 3)...

https://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/new-ccrc-submission

Do you mean issue 3, the integrity of the scene?
Not sure if the Aga burns are part of that issue or not, Myster! They were some of the last evidence to be submitted remember.

[Joe Blogs]

You see, what you've done there is perpetrated about 13 logical fallacies in one sentence.
Feel free to explain all of my points instead of 'look over here, not there'.

Put your Magic Aga theory to one side for a moment and consider the chronology and pathology of the crime itself, which you've notcieably failed to do thus far.
Explain how Sheila killed Nevill.
Explain why she killed him first.
Explain how June, Sheila and the kids all slept through a monumental fight.

'Explain how Sheila killed Nevill'=four shots to the head.

            'Explain why she killed him first,'=She didn't! Nevill was killed last.

            'Explain how June, Sheila and the kids all slept through a monumental fight=They didn't!June and the kids were dead by then, and Sheila wasn't in bed at all, she was one of the participants of the 'momumental fight'!

[Vertigo Swirl]

'Explain how Sheila killed Nevill'=four shots to the head.

            'Explain why she killed him first,'=She didn't! Nevill was killed last.

            'Explain how June, Sheila and the kids all slept through a monumental fight=They didn't!June and the kids were dead by then, and Sheila wasn't in bed at all, she was one of the participants of the 'momumental fight'!

OK Explain why she didn’t kill Nevill first but chose to only bash him on the head with a loaded shotgun and then leave him alive before going upstairs to kill everyone else.

[APRIL]

Well it seems the Aga evidence hasn't been concidered yet, April, going by the articles that Myster has posted.

Or it was considered too irrelevant to give credence to? I'm not the only person with an Aga. Even with my limited mathematic knowledge it was obvious to me that Boyce's didn't have teeth. I've been perfectly happy to share my own beliefs/measurements with those who are more technical. All of them, having taken finer measurements, have concurred with my findings.