Enlisting Chat GPT to review the case

[Vertigo Swirl]

My guess is to derail the thread, and for that Faithlilly must be congratulated for her success.  Now, can anyone please take issue with any of the specifics in the Chat GPT timeline as presented above or must we simply disregard timelines on the basis that no one can be trusted and in so doing give ourselves carte blanche to make up any old theory to suit our biases?  So far, based on one contribution that would seem to be the preferred route. 

[faithlilly]

Robots are just fine for serious examination of the case but they aren?t half as entertaining as real McCann sceptics so that?s why I guess. Why are you still here?  Why after several weeks of virtually no interchange on the board did you decide to reignite conversation with me?

You are virtually the only one still banging the faithful drum. I really didn?t have much option.

[Vertigo Swirl]

You are virtually the only one still banging the faithful drum. I really didn?t have much option.

You had the option to not comment but you decided to engage with me and then for some reason decided to shut the discussion down straight afterwards.  Odd.

[faithlilly]

You had the option to not comment but you decided to engage with me and then for some reason decided to shut the discussion down straight afterwards.  Odd.

I didn?t tend to discuss it with you just offer an opinion.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I didn?t tend to discuss it with you just offer an opinion.

I think you know by now that if you offer an opinion it tends to invite further discussion, however as that was apparently not your intention then feel free to leave the thread without any further derailment.  Many thanks.