Poll

Peer Reviewed Research suggests that Scent Dogs of all types have a maximunm combined accuracy of about 90%

I Understand and Accept this
3 (50%)
I believe Scent Dogs are more accurate than this
1 (16.7%)
I am not sure
1 (16.7%)
I don't believe Scent Dogs generally are that accurate
1 (16.7%)

Total Members Voted: 6

Voting closed: July 24, 2018, 11:14:43 AM

Author Topic: Poll - Scent Dogs Accuracy  (Read 496457 times)

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Poll - Scent Dogs Accuracy
« Reply #285 on: February 14, 2014, 09:47:46 PM »
I have just been sent this.......

'From his rogatory in 2008

In this case in particular, where the dogs alerted there was confirmation by positive results from the forensic examinations. It is the investigators' responsibility to apply the results of the forensic analysis to the suspects, witnesses and crime scenes.'

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES_RIGATORY.htm

Correct. I posted about this a couple weeks ago against misleading claims that Grime had stated the dog alerts had no value in this case, and got ignored, something he never actually never said, good post


 8((()*/


Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Poll - Scent Dogs Accuracy
« Reply #286 on: February 14, 2014, 09:50:41 PM »
cant find that statement anywhere on that link

It's in there though 8)-)))

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Poll - Scent Dogs Accuracy
« Reply #287 on: February 14, 2014, 09:51:24 PM »
Correct. I posted about this a couple weeks ago against misleading claims that Grime had stated the dog alerts had no value in this case, and got ignored, something he never actually never said, good post


 8((()*/

The statement you have claimed does not exist on the link provided...could you provide the correct link...I think you are quoting out of context,....


The quotes I posted are taken directly from the mccannn files..these are GENUINE  grime quotes

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Poll - Scent Dogs Accuracy
« Reply #288 on: February 14, 2014, 09:52:42 PM »
It's in there though 8)-)))

Sorry but you continue to avoid giving the correct link...lets have the full quote as well... I guarantee red is WRONG

Offline Sherlock Holmes

Re: Poll - Scent Dogs Accuracy
« Reply #289 on: February 14, 2014, 09:54:31 PM »
What's the relevance of doggies to the opening of the investigation?


Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Poll - Scent Dogs Accuracy
« Reply #290 on: February 14, 2014, 09:56:24 PM »
Sorry but you continue to avoid giving the correct link...lets have the full quote as well... I guarantee red is WRONG

>@@(*&) How much are you wagering?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Poll - Scent Dogs Accuracy
« Reply #291 on: February 14, 2014, 09:58:10 PM »
What's the relevance of doggies to the opening of the investigation?

I agree its off topic but this claim cannot go unchallenged..imo red is seriously misleading posters

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Poll - Scent Dogs Accuracy
« Reply #292 on: February 14, 2014, 10:04:20 PM »
Oh dear,  is someone having kittens in thread for some unfathomable reason?

no Im just asking for corroboration.  .but theres none...a bit like the dogs alerts

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Poll - Scent Dogs Accuracy
« Reply #293 on: February 14, 2014, 10:07:09 PM »
Read the page 8)--))

I've read the page..I don't see this statement....  .why don't you just copy the whole paragraph and not just one sentence...certainly blood was found on the key fob but the alerts re cadaver contaminant were not corroborated

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Poll - Scent Dogs Accuracy
« Reply #294 on: February 14, 2014, 10:13:17 PM »
SO ..if we can recap  Grime said the dogs alerts had no evidential value...the alerts by the evrd dog were not corroborated....the one by the blood dog on the key fob was....conclusion..NO EVIDENCE OF A CADAVER IN 5A

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Poll - Scent Dogs Accuracy
« Reply #295 on: February 14, 2014, 10:13:49 PM »
I've read the page..I don't see this statement....  .why don't you just copy the whole paragraph and not just one sentence...certainly blood was found on the key fob but the alerts re cadaver contaminant were not corroborated

It's only the third paragraph 8()-000(

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Poll - Scent Dogs Accuracy
« Reply #296 on: February 14, 2014, 10:21:13 PM »
It's only the third paragraph 8()-000(

Thank you....so...which alerts were corroborated...all of them ...some of them....one of them...this is important as posters are accusing the McCanns of quite serious crimes

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Poll - Scent Dogs Accuracy
« Reply #297 on: February 14, 2014, 10:27:59 PM »
Thank you....so...which alerts were corroborated...all of them ...some of them....one of them...this is important as posters are accusing the McCanns of quite serious crimes

Davel, you agree this was one of the most high-profile cases in the world, if not the most?

Do you really think Mr Grime or anyone else is going to go into detail in writing?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Poll - Scent Dogs Accuracy
« Reply #298 on: February 14, 2014, 10:31:42 PM »
Davel, you agree this was one of the most high-profile cases in the world, if not the most?

Do you really think Mr Grime or anyone else is going to go into detail in writing?

 I think grime could have been more straightforward but he was setting himself up in business...plus its his job to collect evidence not to comment on it...what I would say is that Grime said that the alerts had no evidential value without corroboration and there was no corroboration of the evrd dogs alerts

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Poll - Scent Dogs Accuracy
« Reply #299 on: February 14, 2014, 10:59:54 PM »
  not sure I denied it..try not to do denial...I said I couldn't see it...I wanted someone to point out where it was and you did...the statement means nothing....Im going to look at the Portuguese tomorrow to see what it says

It means he was being very careful with his words, like everyone else involved in this case. For obvious reasons.

That's all we can say.

Because none of us are experts.
« Last Edit: February 14, 2014, 11:01:35 PM by Lyall »