Did the PJ advise against releasing identifying features relating to Maddy?

[Redblossom]

luz says " When advised not to reveal anything that could identify physically the child, Mr. McCann decided to reveal the coloboma, because it was a good marketing ploy."

Has anyone proved that this is correct yet (see thread title)?

If it is correct then who was it that advised the Mccanns and when was that advice given?

It has been proven the the Portuguese authorities revealed the details very early.

The PJ released the information on May 5th.

It is up to Luz to show that what she claimed is true. I do not believe that the claim she made that the McCanns released this information is true. She stated that the McCanns were indulging the press on the morning of 4th May. They were not in fact doing that at all.



bump to get past the personal posts

The PJ released the information on May 5th.

It is up to Luz to show that what she claimed is true.

She stated that the McCanns were indulging the press on the morning of 4th May. They were not in fact doing that at all. They were giving statements to the police.

The first statement they made was on the evening of the 4th of May and they made no mention of any eye defect then.

Nor did they make any such mention on 5th May in the second statement made to the press.

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id170.html

As the PJ are known to have released the information on May 5th I think it highly unlikely that Luz or anyone else can demonstrate that the McCanns did so before them.

We will see what Luz manages to dig up to support the statement she made.
[/quote]

What a load of rubbish, the mccanns put out the coloboma on 5th may, in big style, and continued it, the pj said she had a spot in her eye, not a massive advert by anymeans,how many people read the pjs website over and above all the papers which had  maddies right  eye sticking out like hell for ages, via the media, they had and held up postera of Maddie with the LOOK into my eyes campaign,via their website via other areas, zzzzzzz but kate mccann said in 2011 in an interview with cnn that they never made anything much of it LOL

Cnn kate

K. MCCANN: If I'm honest, we haven't put too much emphasis on her eye, because I think you have to be very close to her to see

LOOk posters

http://www.gossiprocks.com/forum/news/48673-madeleine-sighting-belgium-raises-new-hopes-100-days-after-she-disappeared.html

[amaraltheofficeboy]

luz says " When advised not to reveal anything that could identify physically the child, Mr. McCann decided to reveal the coloboma, because it was a good marketing ploy."

Has anyone proved that this is correct yet (see thread title)?

If it is correct then who was it that advised the Mccanns and when was that advice given?

It has been proven the the Portuguese authorities revealed the details very early.

[Eleanor]

Fibbing again, RedBlossom.  You are wasting your time.  It has already been established that what you say is just not true.
Another Myth debunked.

[Redblossom]

Fibbing again, RedBlossom.  You are wasting your time.  It has already been established that what you say is just not true.
Another Myth debunked.

You failed to  detail what I was FIBBING about, do go on and what myth has been debunked that i m trying to carry
on i assure you i dont proliferate any proven myths so put up or shut up

[muratfan]

Fibbing again, RedBlossom.  You are wasting your time.  It has already been established that what you say is just not true.
Another Myth debunked.

You failedto detail what I was FIBBING about, do go on

Everything you post

[Eleanor]

Fibbing again, RedBlossom.  You are wasting your time.  It has already been established that what you say is just not true.
Another Myth debunked.

You failed to  detail what I was FIBBING about, do go on and what myth has been debunked that i m trying to carry
on i assure you i dont proliferate any proven myths so put up or shut up

Do a bit of research.  In fact, read the posts on this Thread.  Your fibs are too many to detail individually.  Only your fibs are profligate.

[Redblossom]

Fibbing again, RedBlossom.  You are wasting your time.  It has already been established that what you say is just not true.
Another Myth debunked.

You failed to  detail what I was FIBBING about, do go on and what myth has been debunked that i m trying to carry
on i assure you i dont proliferate any proven myths so put up or shut up

Do a bit of research.  In fact, read the posts on this Thread.  Your fibs are too many to detail individually.  Only your fibs are profligate.

where have i lied on this thread?

[Eleanor]

Fibbing again, RedBlossom.  You are wasting your time.  It has already been established that what you say is just not true.
Another Myth debunked.

You failed to  detail what I was FIBBING about, do go on and what myth has been debunked that i m trying to carry
on i assure you i dont proliferate any proven myths so put up or shut up

Do a bit of research.  In fact, read the posts on this Thread.  Your fibs are too many to detail individually.  Only your fibs are profligate.

where have i lied on this thread? Sad cow

Do you suffer from black outs and memory loss?  I wouldn't be at all surprised if you do.

[Redblossom]

Eleanor i asked you a question and you didnt answer that makes YOU dishonest, evasive and snakeish

Repeatingthe question, where did i lie

[Eleanor]

Eleanor i asked you a question and you didnt answer that makes YOU dishonest, evasive and snakeish

Repeatingthe question, where did i lie

And a Sad Cow.  Don't forget that.  I liked that one.

[Redblossom]

Eleanor i asked you a question and you didnt answer that makes YOU dishonest, evasive and snakeish

Repeatingthe question, where did i lie

And a Sad Cow.  Don't forget that.  I liked that one.

So no proof where i have lied here,whose thesad cow

[Eleanor]

Eleanor i asked you a question and you didnt answer that makes YOU dishonest, evasive and snakeish

Repeatingthe question, where did i lie

And a Sad Cow.  Don't forget that.  I liked that one.

So no proof where i have lied here,whose thesad cow

I think we all know the answer to that question by now.

[Redblossom]

Eleanor i asked you a question and you didnt answer that makes YOU dishonest, evasive and snakeish

Repeatingthe question, where did i lie

And a Sad Cow.  Don't forget that.  I liked that one.

So no proof where i have lied here,whose thesad cow

I think we all know the answer to that question by now.

So no proof where i lied, if u cant come up with it just makes you a pathetic liar
 

[debunker]

@Redblossom

Do you accept that the PJ issued a Press Release on 5th May 2007 detailing Madeleine's eye defect?

[Carana]

To: The Assistant Prosecutor
Public Ministry


Date: 04-05-2007



Subject: Request for Divulgation by means of the Press


As it is of clear interest to the investigation of the case in reference, I have the honour to ask you to authorise the divulgation of the disappearance of the young girl Madeleine McCann by means of the organs of the press, with the aim of obtaining information leading to her whereabouts.

I enclose a model for divulgation.

With best compliments

The Coordinator of the Investigation.

G. Amaral
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MADELINE.htm


Letter from the Lagos Public Ministry

To: Portimao DIC

Date: 04-05-2007

Subject: Request for Divulgation by Means of the Media with Reference to the Disappearance of Madeleine McCann

This letter serves to communicate to you that within the framework of what is laid down in Article 86 n? 5 of the CPP I authorise this police force to divulge the disappearance of Madeleine Beth McCann by means of the organs of the press with the aim of obtaining information leading to her whereabouts, in accordance with the press release model that was sent to us.

With best compliments,

Signed

The Deputy Prosecutor

Sandra Marques