Author Topic: Let's do Conspiracy, The Government and the Press  (Read 8458 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Luz

Re: Let's do Conspiracy, The Government and the Press
« Reply #15 on: May 03, 2013, 11:52:31 AM »
I don't have the time or the will to entertain muratfan and his associates.

But since I'm here now, I'll say this: get another job quickly.
The McCann fable is about to end.
I'm not a psychic, just an ordinary reader of "papers" in their various forms, material or digital. The McCann grapevine is not delivering any grapes much longer, so you won't be able to make vinegar out of it.

I am not a friend, but in my country there is a saying: Quem te avisa teu amigo é «The one that advises you is your friend»


P.S. oooooooops!, guess I'll get another reprimand from our Admin. But you see Sir/Mm, I live in a country where we can express freely our thoughts since 1974. When our expression goes over the top we make amends, if you feel like I shouldn't chastisize the marionette, I'll abide to your recomendation
« Last Edit: May 03, 2013, 12:05:41 PM by Luz »

Offline Carana

Re: Let's do Conspiracy, The Government and the Press
« Reply #16 on: May 03, 2013, 11:54:50 AM »
Carana, if I may, a bit too much to be called sarcastic, don't you think ?
I don't see how conspiration could explain this case.
But I find normal that an ambitious guy married to a beautiful woman will fight to keep what he managed to achieve.

Anne, in the points I raised, I have never found a shred of evidence that they were true.

As I'm not privy to US military intelligence, I can't actually prove whether satellites were deviated from PdL or not. I doubt that anyone else could prove anything either.

What about the other 2 points, Anne? ;)
Carana, I suppose I erroneously assumed you had invented all those points out of derision !


I'd agree that the tone of my post was flippant. But I was actually serious about the content.

debunker

  • Guest
Re: Let's do Conspiracy, The Government and the Press
« Reply #17 on: May 03, 2013, 12:01:55 PM »

I agree totally- just trying to smoke out any [ censored word ]s!

Can I borrow your dictionary Debunker?

English is an evolving language:

http://illuminutti.com/2012/04/23/ten-characteristics-of-conspiracy-theorists-a-look-into-the-mind-of-[ censored word ]s-nutjobs-and-tin-foil-hatters/