Author Topic: Luz  (Read 5395 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

debunker

  • Guest
Re: Luz
« Reply #15 on: May 03, 2013, 03:47:55 PM »
Luz-you don't have to justify your presence here, you have done nothing to antagonize anyone, he just wants to be right all the time and have the last word, don't let him put you off posting here, just hit the report button mate.

I just want her to back up her incomplete assertions with facts.

Offline Joanne

Re: Luz
« Reply #16 on: May 03, 2013, 03:53:33 PM »
Luz doesn't have to back her opinions up with fact, you can't chase someone round a forum asserting they back their opinions up which you are doing big time, you are very antagonistic towards people who do not share your opinions and it's not very wlcoming to people who posts and it looks like you are bullying them. Nobody actually knows what happened in this case other than Madeleine was there and then she wasn't, we only have the PJ files to go on which lead in all directions and nowhere at all and a lot of stuff is open to interpretation.

I am also extremely annoyed that admin see fit to allow such threads as this to remain when it is clearly not acceptable and at 43 posts a day, thats good going by anyone's standards. I'm sorry but people will leave if this continues because it's not a pleasant environment to be posting in when your being followed and attacked.

Offline Admin

Re: Luz
« Reply #17 on: May 03, 2013, 03:55:23 PM »
Luz.   Please refrain from bad mouthing fellow members.  There will be no further warning.

Could we set the record straight about the time taken to walk from the tapas bar to the patio doors of apartment 5a at Ocean club.   It does not take 5 minutes as Luz so disingenuously posted, it does in fact take a mere 50 seconds or much less if you were to run.

Lets keep to the facts members.   ?>)()<


Offline Luz

Re: Luz
« Reply #18 on: May 03, 2013, 04:06:39 PM »
Luz.   Please refrain from bad mouthing fellow members.  There will be no further warning.

Could we set the record straight about the time taken to walk from the tapas bar to the patio doors of apartment 5a at Ocean club.   It does not take 5 minutes as Luz so disingenuously posted, it does in fact take a mere 50 seconds or much less if you were to run.

Lets keep to the facts members.   ?>)()<

I knew it Mr. Administrator.

This is just like in  Elementary school: I can't pull anyone's hair (or mustache, or nose) that he doesn't go like a br-t, I mean, a concerned scient,...not this either, an offended subject to report me to the Director. Such a squirrel.

But okay, I'll be a good abiding person and restrain my language - tchiiii, being a foreigner this is going to be hard.

Cross my heart ( but please don't make me die)

Yours, respectfully
Luz

Offline Admin

Re: Luz
« Reply #19 on: May 03, 2013, 04:08:51 PM »
Everyone has to abide by the rules.  Not having English as a first language is not an excuse.

Offline Luz

Re: Luz
« Reply #20 on: May 03, 2013, 04:29:04 PM »
Luz.   Please refrain from bad mouthing fellow members.  There will be no further warning.

Could we set the record straight about the time taken to walk from the tapas bar to the patio doors of apartment 5a at Ocean club.   It does not take 5 minutes as Luz so disingenuously posted, it does in fact take a mere 50 seconds or much less if you were to run.

Lets keep to the facts members.   ?>)()<

Thinking about it, what the heck is badmouthing?....hey, dear Administrator?

I've been called a liar by these same creatures that feel so offended by my way of speaking. I never called them anything they didn't call me.  I never started threads with these creatures names (and there is plenty  to reveal).

Why am I being sorted out?
Anyway I've promised to behave and I always try to keep my promises. 
« Last Edit: May 03, 2013, 04:32:32 PM by Luz »

debunker

  • Guest
Re: Luz
« Reply #21 on: May 03, 2013, 04:45:25 PM »
Luz doesn't have to back her opinions up with fact, you can't chase someone round a forum asserting they back their opinions up which you are doing big time, you are very antagonistic towards people who do not share your opinions and it's not very wlcoming to people who posts and it looks like you are bullying them. Nobody actually knows what happened in this case other than Madeleine was there and then she wasn't, we only have the PJ files to go on which lead in all directions and nowhere at all and a lot of stuff is open to interpretation.

I am also extremely annoyed that admin see fit to allow such threads as this to remain when it is clearly not acceptable and at 43 posts a day, thats good going by anyone's standards. I'm sorry but people will leave if this continues because it's not a pleasant environment to be posting in when your being followed and attacked.


Luz makes unsubstantiated statements that decry other people, then she refuses to substantiate them and runs away hoping it will be forgotten.

Offline Luz

Re: Luz
« Reply #22 on: May 03, 2013, 05:07:13 PM »
Luz doesn't have to back her opinions up with fact, you can't chase someone round a forum asserting they back their opinions up which you are doing big time, you are very antagonistic towards people who do not share your opinions and it's not very wlcoming to people who posts and it looks like you are bullying them. Nobody actually knows what happened in this case other than Madeleine was there and then she wasn't, we only have the PJ files to go on which lead in all directions and nowhere at all and a lot of stuff is open to interpretation.

I am also extremely annoyed that admin see fit to allow such threads as this to remain when it is clearly not acceptable and at 43 posts a day, thats good going by anyone's standards. I'm sorry but people will leave if this continues because it's not a pleasant environment to be posting in when your being followed and attacked.


Luz makes unsubstantiated statements that decry other people, then she refuses to substantiate them and runs away hoping it will be forgotten.

I gave my word to the Administrator or I would make your behind swirl in that ridiculous London wheel!
 8()(((@#

Offline Benice

Re: Luz
« Reply #23 on: May 03, 2013, 05:11:36 PM »
Luz doesn't have to back her opinions up with fact, you can't chase someone round a forum asserting they back their opinions up which you are doing big time, you are very antagonistic towards people who do not share your opinions and it's not very wlcoming to people who posts and it looks like you are bullying them. Nobody actually knows what happened in this case other than Madeleine was there and then she wasn't, we only have the PJ files to go on which lead in all directions and nowhere at all and a lot of stuff is open to interpretation.

I am also extremely annoyed that admin see fit to allow such threads as this to remain when it is clearly not acceptable and at 43 posts a day, thats good going by anyone's standards. I'm sorry but people will leave if this continues because it's not a pleasant environment to be posting in when your being followed and attacked.

Theres nothing wrong in posting opinions - as long as it's made clear they are only opinions  - and are not being posted as  'facts'.    All IMHO of course.  ?{)(**

The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

debunker

  • Guest
Re: Luz
« Reply #24 on: May 03, 2013, 05:15:35 PM »
Luz doesn't have to back her opinions up with fact, you can't chase someone round a forum asserting they back their opinions up which you are doing big time, you are very antagonistic towards people who do not share your opinions and it's not very wlcoming to people who posts and it looks like you are bullying them. Nobody actually knows what happened in this case other than Madeleine was there and then she wasn't, we only have the PJ files to go on which lead in all directions and nowhere at all and a lot of stuff is open to interpretation.

I am also extremely annoyed that admin see fit to allow such threads as this to remain when it is clearly not acceptable and at 43 posts a day, thats good going by anyone's standards. I'm sorry but people will leave if this continues because it's not a pleasant environment to be posting in when your being followed and attacked.

Theres nothing wrong in posting opinions - as long as it's made clear they are only opinions  - and are not being posted as  'facts'.    All IMHO of course.  ?{)(**

I am talking about factual claims. For instance she claims that the Portuguese law on Child Neglect covers neglect caused unintentionally but refuses to quote the law giving various excuses.

Offline marxman

Re: Luz
« Reply #25 on: May 03, 2013, 08:30:42 PM »
I find this method of devoting a thread to one individual poster a form of 'bullying' with a greater slice of intimidation! 8(8-))

amaraltheofficeboy

  • Guest
Re: Luz
« Reply #26 on: May 03, 2013, 08:37:34 PM »
diddums

debunker

  • Guest
Re: Luz
« Reply #27 on: May 03, 2013, 08:40:11 PM »
I find this method of devoting a thread to one individual poster a form of 'bullying' with a greater slice of intimidation! 8(8-))

I would not do it save for the fact that she always does this- hit-and-run libel and refusing to back up the claims she makes- has been doing it for six years on various boards. When it looks like people have finally twigged how she does this, she withdraws for a few days to let the heat die down and expects to return to the board with all requests for cites forgotten.