Defamation and defamatory ...

[Redblossom]

so basically you are calling BS a liar

all together now.......

No point if you cant prove it is there? Just because you disagree with his views doesnt make any of his assertions, not opinions, but assertions of facts, untrue

[Redblossom]

And the evidence of this woman being threatened with legal action is where?

In BS's blog, it wouldn't  be on the OFM website WOULD it? not in a month of Sundays, so basically you are calling BS a liar, your prerogative of course but doesnt make it true

Was it not Blackmsith who claimed Gerry's thought that the abductor might have been in the apartment at the time of his final check was at the time rather than retrospective?

I dont know, sorry

[faithlilly]

It wasn't Blacksmith that was threatened with legal action, it was the woman that gave the emails, to Blacksnitch!

***

Yes, you are right there, my error, and his name is BlackSMITH, being peurile doesnt do you any good

It was both Redblossom. Seems even their webmaster has her own legal representation.  >@@(*&)

[Eleanor]

And the evidence of this woman being threatened with legal action is where?

In BS's blog, it wouldn't  be on the OFM website WOULD it? not in a month of Sundays, so basically you are calling BS a liar, your prerogative of course but doesnt make it true

Blacksmith a Liar?  What a suggestion.  He just tells Big Porkies.  Everybody knows that.

[AnneGuedes]

I have a point for debate; If they were involved in Madeleine's disappearance, why on earth would they have dared to mount legal action - especially against the UK Press as they were still arguido at this time.  Why did they push for the SY Review?

May be because no body, no case.

Can't agree with you there, Anne, unfortunately.  Gerry and Kate McCann must have nerves of steel to mount all this legal action and keep in the public eye were they guilty of anything.  IMO they would have just slunk away quietly in July 2008.

I'm not sure I understand this, Rachel.
Were they guilty, they would have just slunk away ?

Hi Anne, yes in my opinion had they been guilty they would have simply melted into obscurity in 2008.  They haven't.   They have continued to keep Madeleine's profile high, pushed for the SY Review and taken legal action to stop defamation.   This is just another reason why I believe Kate and Gerry McCann to be innocent.

Yes, it is possible, Rachel.
But, supposing they know no body will ever be found, it's smarter not to retreat.
Doubt remains over their heads and they'll likely never get rid of it, but doubt would certainly be much heavier were people like you - and you are many - not thinking that reasonably, if guilty, they had stepped backstage.

[Redblossom]

Let me get this straight.  Blacksmith was told some stuff by another anonymous person on the internet and then he writes about it on his (often unreliable and always anti McCann propaganda) blog and we're supposed to just accept it's absolutely the truth? LOL.

No,a poster went on the OFM website on FB and asked a question about whether it was true the Mccanns offered Amaral an out of court settlement, to which the website master said, let me ask Kate and get back to you. The WM came back and said it was unfounded rumours. This is fact as I and many others saw it at the time. Further to that what went on with BS and whoever emailed him about the matter is not in the public domain as in copies of the emails well I should think not, but BS blogged about it. As said you prerogative to call him a liar.But I see no reason for him to make any such thing up.

[ferryman]

 This is fact as I and many others saw it at the time.

Who screenshot it?

[faithlilly]

Let me get this straight.  Blacksmith was told some stuff by another anonymous person on the internet and then he writes about it on his (often unreliable and always anti McCann propaganda) blog and we're supposed to just accept it's absolutely the truth? LOL.

The emails from the webmaster to the anonymous source are safely squirrelled away for future reference I can assure you. Blacksmith removed the references to the emails, after being threatened with legal action ( an absurd over-reaction by the webmaster if the quotes weren't absolutely genuine ) but the originals still exist.

[faithlilly]

Let me get this straight.  Blacksmith was told some stuff by another anonymous person on the internet and then he writes about it on his (often unreliable and always anti McCann propaganda) blog and we're supposed to just accept it's absolutely the truth? LOL.

No,a poster went on the OFM website on FB and asked a question about whether it was true the Mccanns offered Amaral an out of court settlement, to which the website master said, let me ask Kate and get back to you. The WM came back and said it was unfounded rumours. This is fact as I and many others saw it at the time. Further to that what went on with BS and whoever emailed him about the matter is not in the public domain as in copies of the emails well I should think not, but BS blogged about it. As said you prerogative to call him a liar.But I see no reason for him to make any such thing up.

That's because he didn't.

[ferryman]

Let me get this straight.  Blacksmith was told some stuff by another anonymous person on the internet and then he writes about it on his (often unreliable and always anti McCann propaganda) blog and we're supposed to just accept it's absolutely the truth? LOL.

The emails from the webmaster to the anonymous source are safely squirrelled away for future reference I can assure you. Blacksmith removed the references to the emails, after being threatened with legal action ( an absurd over-reaction by the webmaster if the quotes weren't absolutely genuine ) but the originals still exist.

Ah!

Faith's assurances.

Must be true, then ...

[DCI]

Let me get this straight.  Blacksmith was told some stuff by another anonymous person on the internet and then he writes about it on his (often unreliable and always anti McCann propaganda) blog and we're supposed to just accept it's absolutely the truth? LOL.

No,a poster went on the OFM website on FB and asked a question about whether it was true the Mccanns offered Amaral an out of court settlement, to which the website master said, let me ask Kate and get back to you. The WM came back and said it was unfounded rumours. This is fact as I and many others saw it at the time. Further to that what went on with BS and whoever emailed him about the matter is not in the public domain as in copies of the emails well I should think not, but BS blogged about it. As said you prerogative to call him a liar.But I see no reason for him to make any such thing up.

That's because he didn't.

Well you should know Faith 

[ferryman]

It wasn't Blacksmith that was threatened with legal action, it was the woman that gave the emails, to Blacksnitch!

***

Yes, you are right there, my error, and his name is BlackSMITH, being peurile doesnt do you any good

Then why has Blacksmith himself said on his blog (I think, more than once, certainly at least once) that his name is Anthony Sharples?

[faithlilly]

Let me get this straight.  Blacksmith was told some stuff by another anonymous person on the internet and then he writes about it on his (often unreliable and always anti McCann propaganda) blog and we're supposed to just accept it's absolutely the truth? LOL.

The emails from the webmaster to the anonymous source are safely squirrelled away for future reference I can assure you. Blacksmith removed the references to the emails, after being threatened with legal action ( an absurd over-reaction by the webmaster if the quotes weren't absolutely genuine ) but the originals still exist.

Ah!

Faith's assurances.

Must be true, then ...

No matter whether you believe me or not, suffice to say that when the time is right those emails will play a part in exposing Kate's duplicity.

[Rachel Granada]

Let me get this straight.  Blacksmith was told some stuff by another anonymous person on the internet and then he writes about it on his (often unreliable and always anti McCann propaganda) blog and we're supposed to just accept it's absolutely the truth? LOL.

The emails from the webmaster to the anonymous source are safely squirrelled away for future reference I can assure you. Blacksmith removed the references to the emails, after being threatened with legal action ( an absurd over-reaction by the webmaster if the quotes weren't absolutely genuine ) but the originals still exist.

Ah!

Faith's assurances.

Must be true, then ...

No matter whether you believe me or not, suffice to say that when the time is right those emails will play a part in exposing Kate's duplicity.

When do you think that "when the time is right" will happen? When they are charged? Ain't going to happen.  They are innocent.

[ferryman]

Let me get this straight.  Blacksmith was told some stuff by another anonymous person on the internet and then he writes about it on his (often unreliable and always anti McCann propaganda) blog and we're supposed to just accept it's absolutely the truth? LOL.

The emails from the webmaster to the anonymous source are safely squirrelled away for future reference I can assure you. Blacksmith removed the references to the emails, after being threatened with legal action ( an absurd over-reaction by the webmaster if the quotes weren't absolutely genuine ) but the originals still exist.

Ah!

Faith's assurances.

Must be true, then ...

No matter whether you believe me or not, suffice to say that when the time is right those emails will play a part in exposing Kate's duplicity.

No screenshots?