Defamation and defamatory ...

[Redblossom]

Martha said; Maybe Amaral's ace and Blacksmith's squirrel are one and the same...? (ie: imaginary...)

Yup.  Had Amaral's ace and the PJs "stand alone evidence" had any credibility, both would have been played long ago.  As for Blacksmith - an attention-seeker with nothing credible to say in general, although to be fair I thoroughly enjoyed his demolition job on Bennett back in December/January - it was spot on.  About the only sensible contribution he has ever made.

Well it would be to your turn of view, cherry picking at its best, same happens all the time with every source, BS is wrong unless he attacks x y z, the files are wrong unless they support x y z, the PP final report, the Police summary,  the papers are wrong unless....you get the drift

[amaraltheofficeboy]

Faithlilly said; Perhaps at the libel trial when iI is revealed the McCanns did indeed ask to settle 

and the importance of that is what?

[registrar]

Martha said; Maybe Amaral's ace and Blacksmith's squirrel are one and the same...? (ie: imaginary...)

Yup.  Had Amaral's ace and the PJs "stand alone evidence" had any credibility, both would have been played long ago.  As for Blacksmith - an attention-seeker with nothing credible to say in general, although to be fair I thoroughly enjoyed his demolition job on Bennett back in December/January - it was spot on.  About the only sensible contribution he has ever made.

Well it would be to your turn of view, cherry picking at its best, same happens all the time with every source, BS is wrong unless he attacks x y z, the files are wrong unless they support x y z, the PP final report, the Police summary,  the papers are wrong unless....you get the drift

Well I always thought BS was a wrong 'un
200 words where 2 would have done

another fallen saint of the h a t e r s
 

[faithlilly]

Faithlilly said; Perhaps at the libel trial when iI is revealed the McCanns did indeed ask to settle 

and the importance of that is what?

It will go to the very heart of their credibility and show in stark relief their manipulation of the truth. If the McCanns have asked to settle yet Kate, via her webmaster, has denied it we will all see how far they will go to hide the truth.

[Rachel Granada]

And sentimental agent keeps stirring the broth - for 6 years now

Oh yes, forgot about Sentimental Agent.  Was he the one who claimed that the PJ had "stand alone" evidence?

Yes that's him

he was constantly at PJ barbecues - and excited the gullible with 'knowledge' gleaned there

Yep, it's coming back to me now. Another spreader of PJ misinformation and lies.

[Redblossom]

Reported
 

you really should follow forum rules and warnings registrar

I see no evidence of BS being a fallen anything, jealous of his creative thought and astuteness? His writings and opinions are based on facts, likening him to people like the stupid coldwater is clutching at straws at best, but you can only cling onto what you can I guess

[amaraltheofficeboy]

Faithlilly said; Perhaps at the libel trial when iI is revealed the McCanns did indeed ask to settle 

and the importance of that is what?

It will go to the very heart of their credibility and show in stark relief their manipulation of the truth. If the McCanns have asked to settle yet Kate, via her webmaster, has denied it we will all see how far they will go to hide the truth.

ah - I see

[Rachel Granada]

Martha said; Maybe Amaral's ace and Blacksmith's squirrel are one and the same...? (ie: imaginary...)

Yup.  Had Amaral's ace and the PJs "stand alone evidence" had any credibility, both would have been played long ago.  As for Blacksmith - an attention-seeker with nothing credible to say in general, although to be fair I thoroughly enjoyed his demolition job on Bennett back in December/January - it was spot on.  About the only sensible contribution he has ever made.

Well it would be to your turn of view, cherry picking at its best, same happens all the time with every source, BS is wrong unless he attacks x y z, the files are wrong unless they support x y z, the PP final report, the Police summary,  the papers are wrong unless....you get the drift

Let's get down to the nitty gritty.  Do you believe Amaral's thesis that Madeleine's remains were hidden for 3 weeks and then removed in the Scenic? And if so, why?

[registrar]

Reported
 

you really should follow forum rules and warnings registrar

I see no evidence of BS being a fallen anything, jealous of his creative thought and astuteness? His writings and opinions are based on facts, likening him to people like the stupid coldwater is clutching at straws at best, but you can only cling onto what you can I guess

Your choice to take a shine to him

Not reported btw - not childish enough

[Rachel Granada]

Faithlilly said; Perhaps at the libel trial when iI is revealed the McCanns did indeed ask to settle 

and the importance of that is what?

It will go to the very heart of their credibility and show in stark relief their manipulation of the truth. If the McCanns have asked to settle yet Kate, via her webmaster, has denied it we will all see how far they will go to hide the truth.

The truth.  Here's the truth.  Kate and Gerry McCann weren't even arrested, never mind charged or convicted.  Why do you think that might be? And while we're about it, explain where they hid Madeleine's remains for 3 weeks?

[icabodcrane]

Faithlilly said; Perhaps at the libel trial when iI is revealed the McCanns did indeed ask to settle 


No-one knows who asked for the settlement.  Those who purport that the McCanns have asked for a settlement are those bastions of truth - the PT press and no-mark blogger Blacksmith.

If The McCanns had wanted a Settlement they would have gotten one.  As it is, they were forced to listen to what Amaral wanted to offer.  Obviously not enough.

What evidence supports that claim ?

[DCI]

Faithlilly said; Perhaps at the libel trial when iI is revealed the McCanns did indeed ask to settle 


No-one knows who asked for the settlement.  Those who purport that the McCanns have asked for a settlement are those bastions of truth - the PT press and no-mark blogger Blacksmith.

If The McCanns had wanted a Settlement they would have gotten one.  As it is, they were forced to listen to what Amaral wanted to offer.  Obviously not enough.

Exactly, Eleanor.
I see somebody is holding back. Seems they don't want anyone knowing about what underhand means were used, to gain info.
If I remember correctly, they asked about rumours and were worried about the fund, if Kate and Gerry settled.
By the way, as I read them on BS it was webmasters own reply, and not Kate's.
I have them all somewhere, will try and dig them out  >@@(*&)

[amaraltheofficeboy]

are we talking about the same blacksmith that got pissed off cos amaral didn't listen to him?

[Redblossom]

Martha said; Maybe Amaral's ace and Blacksmith's squirrel are one and the same...? (ie: imaginary...)

Yup.  Had Amaral's ace and the PJs "stand alone evidence" had any credibility, both would have been played long ago.  As for Blacksmith - an attention-seeker with nothing credible to say in general, although to be fair I thoroughly enjoyed his demolition job on Bennett back in December/January - it was spot on.  About the only sensible contribution he has ever made.

Well it would be to your turn of view, cherry picking at its best, same happens all the time with every source, BS is wrong unless he attacks x y z, the files are wrong unless they support x y z, the PP final report, the Police summary,  the papers are wrong unless....you get the drift

Let's get down to the nitty gritty.  Do you believe Amaral's thesis that Madeleine's remains were hidden for 3 weeks and then removed in the Scenic? And if so, why?

Not thought about it and irrelevant to this thread

[registrar]

are we talking about the same blacksmith that got pissed off cos amaral didn't listen to him?

yep, his ego was hurt by that