Defamation and defamatory ...

[AnneGuedes]

Amarals statement saying, "Calpol, a medication designed to facilitate falling asleep", is a lie.

No, DCI, it's not a lie. It helps ! At least children who really want to sleep. But could Madeleine sleep ? Wasn't she scared to know she was left alone ? isn'it why she was so tired (she hadn't slept properly the night before) ?

[faithlilly]

@ DCI


'The email from the pretendy supporter said "she would assume it was from Kate". When it was not.'

And you know this how ?

Well when emails are passed from member to member on certain forums, They should make sure the persons name and email are removed, first. So thats how I know 

Huh, huh DCI. These emails have been seen by no one on any forum so you must be either the webmaster or spreading disinformation for her.

So how did BS get them?

Believe what you like, I know what I've got and its from no webmaster, and I don't do Facebook. END OF!

You have snared yourself deliciously DCI. So who are you the webmaster or someone close to her ?

[ferryman]

Amarals statement saying, "Calpol, a medication designed to facilitate falling asleep", is a lie.

No, DCI, it's not a lie. It helps ! At least children who really want to sleep. But could Madeleine sleep ? Wasn't she scared to know she was left alone ? isn'it why she was so tired (she hadn't slept properly the night before) ?

Yes, it was/is a lie, except perhaps in one sense.

Children and adults alike sleep better free of pain than in pain. 

So if you give a child in obvious discomfort (perhaps because of teething problems) a dose of calpol, the calpol may help take away the discomfort, which in turn may help the child to settle, and a settled child will likely sleep better than one in pain.

But calpol has no sedative property.

[faithlilly]

So perhaps "Faithlilly" can tell me - where is this evidence of Kate lying?

There is no concrete evidence yet, just speculation based on the webmaster's reaction to Kate's claim being made public. For confirmation of my suspicions we will have to wait to the libel trial.

Who cares? These fabled e-mails will have no bearing whatsoever in the forthcoming court hearing.

They will, however, reveal if Kate is willing to tell a lie when the circumstances demand it.

[AnneGuedes]

But it was Amaral, that said they used Calpol, not GNR, Anne. Calpol does not have sedative properties.

Its in his book.
He slipped up though, because he said they used "Calpol Night". Which wasn't available in 2007.

Fernergan always had some soothing capacity. My aunt, a doctor, used to give this to me, because I hated sleeping.
Now trained doctors have some other drugs, like benzodiazepins. They've a short half-life.

Fine Anne, but Calpol has never been a medication designed to facilitate falling sleep.

According to my late doctor auntie, fenergan had this effect. But of course it would have none on a little c.....e decided not to sleep (as I was).

[Rachel Granada]

@ DCI


'The email from the pretendy supporter said "she would assume it was from Kate". When it was not.'

And you know this how ?

Well when emails are passed from member to member on certain forums, They should make sure the persons name and email are removed, first. So thats how I know 

Huh, huh DCI. These emails have been seen by no one on any forum so you must be either the webmaster or spreading disinformation for her.

So how did BS get them?

Believe what you like, I know what I've got and its from no webmaster, and I don't do Facebook. END OF!

You have snared yourself deliciously DCI. So who are you the webmaster or someone close to her ?

Who cares? These fabled e-mails will have no bearing whatsoever in the forthcoming court hearing.

[Rachel Granada]

So perhaps "Faithlilly" can tell me - where is this evidence of Kate lying?

There is no concrete evidence yet, just speculation based on the webmaster's reaction to Kate's claim being made public. For confirmation of my suspicions we will have to wait to the libel trial.

Who cares? These fabled e-mails will have no bearing whatsoever in the forthcoming court hearing.

They will, however, reveal if Kate is willing to tell a lie when the circumstances demand it.

You really are grasping at straws now.  Who cares? These fabled e-mails will have no bearing whatsoever in the forthcoming court hearing.Who cares? These fabled e-mails will have no bearing whatsoever in the forthcoming court hearing.

[icabodcrane]

So perhaps "Faithlilly" can tell me - where is this evidence of Kate lying?

There is no concrete evidence yet, just speculation based on the webmaster's reaction to Kate's claim being made public. For confirmation of my suspicions we will have to wait to the libel trial.

If the McCanns have settled on Amaral's terms (as allegedly denied by Kate McCann)  please explain why there is a forth-coming libel trial?

I think the allegation is not that the McCanns 'settled' but that it was they who asked for an out of court settlement

That is what was not denied by Kate McCann, according to the webmaster of an official site, as I understand it

[DCI]

Amarals statement saying, "Calpol, a medication designed to facilitate falling asleep", is a lie.

No, DCI, it's not a lie. It helps ! At least children who really want to sleep. But could Madeleine sleep ? Wasn't she scared to know she was left alone ? isn'it why she was so tired (she hadn't slept properly the night before) ?

No it doesn't, Anne.

Calpol - Letter from Johnson & Johnson

by Hael on Wed May 13, 2009 8:59 pm

Our Ref: XXXXXX-Letter
Date: XXXX 2009

 
Dear Madam/Sir

Thank you for your recent enquiry concerning Calpol Infant Suspension (120mg paracetamol per 5ml).

Calpol Infant Suspension contains paracetamol which is used to relieve pain and reduce fever. As you rightly point out, it does not have sedative properties. We are keen to ensure that consumers understand how to use all of our products correctly. In the case of Calpol, we ensure clear messages in our advertising to ensure correct usage. The product also contains clear instructions for use on the box and within the enclosed patient information leaflet.

Thank you for your concern regarding the reputation of our product and the suggestion that we contact Mr Amaral. We will give your suggestion due consideration.
 

Yours sincerely

Johnson & Johnson Ltd

XXXXXX XXXXXXXX BSc (Hons)
Medical Information Officer
Professional Information Ltd
on behalf of Johnson & Johnson Ltd

[Rachel Granada]

So perhaps "Faithlilly" can tell me - where is this evidence of Kate lying?

There is no concrete evidence yet, just speculation based on the webmaster's reaction to Kate's claim being made public. For confirmation of my suspicions we will have to wait to the libel trial.

Who cares? These fabled e-mails will have no bearing whatsoever in the forthcoming court hearing.

They will, however, reveal if Kate is willing to tell a lie when the circumstances demand it.

You really are grasping at straws now.  Who cares? These fabled e-mails will have no bearing whatsoever in the forthcoming court hearing.Who cares? These fabled e-mails will have no bearing whatsoever in the forthcoming court hearing

[AnneGuedes]

So if you give a child in obvious discomfort (perhaps because of teething problems) a dose of calpol, the calpol may help take away the discomfort, which in turn may help the child to settle, and a settled child will likely sleep better than one in pain.

But calpol has no sedative property.

Oh yes, I agree with this. Madeleine had no teething problem, but an anxiety one because she knew she was left alone. No calpol can resolve that. But benzodiazepins could.

[Eleanor]

So if you give a child in obvious discomfort (perhaps because of teething problems) a dose of calpol, the calpol may help take away the discomfort, which in turn may help the child to settle, and a settled child will likely sleep better than one in pain.

But calpol has no sedative property.

Oh yes, I agree with this. Madeleine had no teething problem, but an anxiety one because she knew she was left alone. No calpol can resolve that. But benzodiazepins could.

Are you accusing The McCanns of giving Madeleine  Benzodiazepine?

[AnneGuedes]

So if you give a child in obvious discomfort (perhaps because of teething problems) a dose of calpol, the calpol may help take away the discomfort, which in turn may help the child to settle, and a settled child will likely sleep better than one in pain.

But calpol has no sedative property.

Oh yes, I agree with this. Madeleine had no teething problem, but an anxiety one because she knew she was left alone. No calpol can resolve that. But benzodiazepins could.

Are you accusing The McCanns of giving Madeleine  Benzodiazepine?

I'm not accusing, it's only possible ! Would you sleep gently knowing your parents will leave and not knowing where ? I wouldn't, unless I were dumb, which I don't think Madeleine was. How do you think the abductor managed to rapt this little girl without her screaming ? Chloroform ? Quick effect but very short ! And then ?

[registrar]

FFS. 
 8-)(--)

It's also possible that they injected heroin into her isn't it AnneGuedes? Anything's possible, the question is a) is it likely and b) where's the fkin' evidence to support the ludicrous theories?!

hear, hear beat the parents with a large stick and Madeleine on her tenth birthday also

not right

[icabodcrane]

So perhaps "Faithlilly" can tell me - where is this evidence of Kate lying?

There is no concrete evidence yet, just speculation based on the webmaster's reaction to Kate's claim being made public. For confirmation of my suspicions we will have to wait to the libel trial.

If the McCanns have settled on Amaral's terms (as allegedly denied by Kate McCann)  please explain why there is a forth-coming libel trial?

I think the allegation is not that the McCanns 'settled' but that it was they who asked for an out of court settlement

That is what was not denied by Kate McCann, according to the webmaster of an official site, as I understand it

Wrong.  This was the question raised by the pretendy concerned FB'er that was dismissed as unfounded rumour by the OFM webmaster after allegedly consulting with Kate - read it carefully:


I'm also concerned like Mr xxx if the rumours about Kate and Gerry settling their libel claim on Amaral's terms are true there will be no money left for the search if it is needed. Could you please put my mind at rest. Thanks.
Regards

Can you clarify please ?

Has  Kate McCann denied the allegation that it was she and Gerry who asked for an out of court settlement, or not   ?

The question was raised on the official site, and the webmaster said she would speak to Kate about it  ... is that   correct  ?

So what did Kate say in response   ?