Part of the problem for some in Jersey was that the cadaver and CSI dogs failed to substantiate the claims made of numerous murders committed in the children's home and the burial of the victims within the grounds.
They did their job, they found human decomposition, but forensic study of the items proved that there was no evidence that the alleged murders had happened.
They alerted to the things they were trained to among which were ...
- the infamous tissues
- historic human bone
- milk teeth
- an area where human ashes had been scattered
It is no reflection on the dogs if they fail to find what isn't there to be found.
However, it
may be a reflection on the dog that he reacted to a piece of wood or coconut.
I say
maybe, because there might have been something (else) in the vicinity (of the search) within the dog's scent-range he actually reacted to.
In which case, that would be a reflection on the
handler, for not having the dog screen the area beforehand for pre-existing scents, we know (from the corrupted record of the inspection at the gym) inspections are
supposed to be carried out.