It is more likely that a newspaper article has misrepresented facts rather than someone editing a video for youtube when it can easily be compared to the original
After all these threads I still dont understand your main problem here, it must be a big one to entail you alledging even if in just your opinion that Mrs Fenns statement was deliberately corrupted, Mrs Glynn may not actully exist, and other suspicions
In this instance, it is far more likely to be bloggers than the newspapers misrepresenting facts.
Especially at that juncture, the papers had no particular agenda to do the McCanns any favours, as one or two of them found out later ...
And the evidence is?....
The fact that Mrs Fenn is on record as saying she didn't know a family was in the holiday apartment below.
And that is evidence of bloggers doctoring sic tv videos?
Ref she didnt know a family was in there:
Nonsense as told to you the other day, why do you persist so much, when all the evidence points the other way. Its getting embrassing now, Mrs Fenn refers to the family below several times in her statement, you just cannot base your arguments on snippets out of tabloids whilst ignoring factual statements, thats desperate, but in your ming Mr Amaral was scurrying around changing them all, and Mrs Fenn invebted a non existent person etc, I give up here lol
