Sky's Martin Brunt and that woopsie over the DNA results!

[Lyall]

  I love that efficient erasing. Who did that?

[faithlilly]

Lying again. Where did I say he couldn't lie straight in bed? I'm not playing your stupid games Faith. I pointed out Reis was got at, or he thought he could make more changing tac.

I was paraphrasing DCI. What you actually said is 'He's as two-faced as they come' which amounts to the same thing and no gameplaying here merely pointing out how illogical your use of source material is.

[Brietta]

I love that efficient erasing. Who did that?

I don't think it is the scribbling that is the main point of the communication ... perhaps the relevant part of the communication is that the DNA in the car was bait that reporters swallowed ... Brunt being only one ... and many have continued to swallow it throughout the intervening period.

Brunt and the other reporters had an excuse for believing information from an official source and thus making whoopsies  ... what excuse do the others who have perpetuated that recognised whoopsie have seven years on?

[Lyall]

I don't think it is the scribbling that is the main point of the communication ... perhaps the relevant part of the communication is that the DNA in the car was bait that reporters swallowed ... Brunt being only one ... and many have continued to swallow it throughout the intervening period.

Brunt and the other reporters had an excuse for believing information from an official source and thus making whoopsies  ... what excuse do the others who have perpetuated that recognised whoopsie have seven years on?

Since the first two paragraphs appear to be sensationalist, what makes you think the third isn't?

Your last question: I don't think most people do keep mentioning the hire car?

[Brietta]

Since the first two paragraphs appear to be sensationalist, what makes you think the third isn't?

Your last question: I don't think most people do keep mentioning the hire car?

In a word ... "Woof!"

[Lyall]

In a word ... "Woof!"

Woof! Everyone loves those dogs don't they

[Lyall]

But you ignored my question: how do you know Reis (assuming this is a legitimate document) knew about subject covered in third paragraph when the first two appear to be nonsense/windups?

[Brietta]

Woof! Everyone loves those dogs don't they

The dogs are neither here nor there ... the forensics are the important issue which someone for some reason best known to themselves leaked lies about to the press.  Initially the media was taken in and although only until the release of the actual information ... job done ... there are those who still believe the lie which continues to be propagated and not the official result.

Explain that one if you please.

As for me I can only take my hat off to the proficient propaganda machine while wondering at the considered necessity for it.

[Brietta]

But you ignored my question: how do you know Reis (assuming this is a legitimate document) knew about subject covered in third paragraph when the first two appear to be nonsense/windups?

What makes you think his first two statements are wind ups?

He did sometimes share a by line with Duarte Levy who at that time was an associate of Joanna Morais ... I was under the impression both are impeccable sources and Levy as we know is heavily into visual media ... the recipient of the email who I understand to be a blog admin would perhaps know what the first two comments are about ... why would you assume I would know or even have an opinion on them? 

"Now I understand it was just a bait, and a lot of journalists swallowed it" ... is plain enough and is self explanatory.

[Lyall]

The dogs are neither here nor there ... the forensics are the important issue which someone for some reason best known to themselves leaked lies about to the press.  Initially the media was taken in and although only until the release of the actual information ... job done ... there are those who still believe the lie which continues to be propagated and not the official result.

Explain that one if you please.

As for me I can only take my hat off to the proficient propaganda machine while wondering at the considered necessity for it.

Whose propaganda machine? The newspapers?

[Brietta]

Whose propaganda machine? The newspapers?

The newspapers?  I always thought they printed what sells from the information made available to them some of which resulted in headlines of 100% MADDIE'S DNA costing the proprietors a tidy sum once the truth in the FSS Report was made public.

[Lyall]

The newspapers?  I always thought they printed what sells from the information made available to them some of which resulted in headlines of 100% MADDIE'S DNA costing the proprietors a tidy sum once the truth in the FSS Report was made public.

I think they printed anything because anything would sell. Some of it they lifted from forums. They were crazy days.
But even during those days the papers were still playing both 'sides'. The same issues that had lurid front pages would have articles and columnists that were supportive inside. It's like today, they would print front pages that were as lurid as possible, but there'd nearly always be nothing to the article behind it (it was just headlines).

Most of the inside of the papers was supportive though.

[Lyall]

Apart from the Express & Star probably.

[sadie]

The dogs are neither here nor there ... the forensics are the important issue which someone for some reason best known to themselves leaked lies about to the press.  Initially the media was taken in and although only until the release of the actual information ... job done ... there are those who still believe the lie which continues to be propagated and not the official result.

Explain that one if you please.

As for me I can only take my hat off to the proficient propaganda machine while wondering at the considered necessity for it.

 

I couldn't agree more Brietta.

A professional and well oiled propaganda machine.... everywhere. 

It has been a wonder to behold ... and so damned unfair to Justice and The Mccanns.



Some powerful group has something mighty to hide .... and it has to do with money and power .... and possibly sexual perversion.

[sadie]

I think it is reaching the stage where the only evidence we will have for quite a few articles will be to take screen shots.
I have noticed very recently that there is a systematic "cleansing" on going ... and nothing to do with requests to Google, either.

Me too, I have noticed it. 

The clean up (which has been going on for years by wiping information off the internet) is accelerating ... and also fewer people putting their heads in the noose by making outragious statements.

They are aware that the case is over IMO. 


IMO, SY know exactly who the perps are including the top dog.  They have met mighty barriers wherever they have gone as they have closed in. 


The question is, will the UK have the necessary clout to expose these people?

Or are they, sadly, so powerful that they are untouchables?




All the above is only my opinion, but based on loads of pointers that I have noticed. 
I could be wrong, but I think not.