Investigative opportunities as new evidence

[Heriberto Janosch]

http://espacioexterior.blogspot.com.es/2013/05/madeleine-mccann-abduction-case-will-be.html

Heri

[sadie]

The first of three opportunities you mention that the PJ fauled to investigate:

Heri

1. A man was very close to Madeleine from Monday to Thursday, the abdcution day. On Thursday he was alone at Praia da Luz streets approximately by the time of the abduction. He made a statement to the police saying he was single at the time, but he would be living with a woman. No further action were taken with him. His girlfriend did not make any statement to the police. No mention why he was discarded.

Very interesting Heri.  I have no idea who he would be though.  Presumably you have found him thru the files?

[sadie]

A second opportunity missed.

Heri

2. Another couple was very near Madeleine's apartment minutes after the abduction, and maybe before Madeleine's mother raised the alarm. The woman did a statement to the police. Neither the man was asked by the police nor another woman who was with them minutes earlier. No mention why they were discarded.

So two potential witnesses there who were also missed.  Also their statements, taken independantly, would have been useful to critically examine / corroberate the other witnesses statements

[sadie]

And a third group that wasn't investigated

Her

3. A group of men who were doing repairments in a house 4 minutes walking from Madeleine's apartment in the afternoon the day of the abduction, must be located and investigated. No mention why this lead was not followed.

I wonder if this is the group that there has been much talk about recently?  Were the Brits?

[Heriberto Janosch]

Yes Sadie. All are in the public files. And there are more of this kind ...

Heri.

[sadie]

Well done, Heri for spotting them.