Agreed there are three possible short cuts two of which go around or across a circular green, only Matthew and Gerry know which one they took. The more pertinent issue for me is the claimed 8 minutes to travel this 400 metre route. As it was an emergency Matthew probably ran most of it and got there in a couple of minutes. Double that and add the time he was in reception and you get an all round time of about 10 minutes. If he did the trip twice as appears then you get 20 mins. If you then take the starting point of the discovery that Madeleine had gone at around 10.05 then Matthew must have set out shortly afterwards say at 10.10pm. Add the time taken for the two trips and you get to 10.30 which was when Gerry claims to have gone to reception.
From this it can be seen that Matthew must have spent most of the first half hour traipsing between the apartment and the main reception.
Which is what I would presume someone would be doing if the Reception staff were not reacting. They would make a second trip to emphasise the urgency.
As regards the two options.
I remain of the opinion that the natural reaction of an English holidaymaker when abroad and having an emergency to deal with is not to go to the bar/restaurant where there is no manager or receptionist as in this case and find a waiter/chef/barman or pot boy to deal with it but to the main reception even if it was one minute further from their room/apartment than the bar.
And taking Angelo's logic the difference between the timings would not have been great.
Tapas (45 secs + 6 minutes + 45 secs) x 2 = 15 mins
Reception (2 minutes + 6 minutes + 2 minutes) x 2 = 20 mins
But allowing for the potential surprise (as attested by Anne Guedes) at any odd request and the potential language difficulties of dealing with the non-fluent English of bar/restaurant staff then I suspect the time might actually have been longer going to the Tapas. It may indeed have taken that extra five minutes or so to make themselves clear and to explain the situation.
Plus there is the possibility that the McCanns and their friends were not even certain the Tapas had a direct line which could be used to make calls outside the complex. Many such ancillary sites in resort complexes only have telephones from which calls have to be directed via reception or the possibility of misuse would be too great.
And then would the McCanns and their friends have been certain that there would have been staff there?
I wonder at what time the Tapas staff knocked off from their duties for the night on that particular night?
I understand the McCanns were the last to dine there. They all left (except Diane) at 10.00. How long did she remain?
What did the Tapas staff then do? Were they still in the restaurant/kitchen or did they join in the search?
Would the McCanns or Matthew have even been certain to find someone/anyone present at the bar/restaurant by 10.20 or might they have been scouring the area round the pool/miniclub?
One last thought. Can someone enlighten me as to what this thread is supposed to achieve? We already know the choice that was made. There are perfectly valid reasons why the McCanns and Matthew would use Reception. What is the purpose of proving (even if that were possible) that a couple of minutes could have been shaved off the time involved? Will that help indicate something important in relation to what happened to Madeleine McCann and if so what is that something important?