Ricardo Paiva, "Kate McCann had a dream where she saw Maddie on a hillside"

[pegasus]

At least we've progressed from the incorrect idea that none of his statements were arguido.
But back on topic - the parents first learned of Krugel's opinion, that the child was likely to be deceased, and predicting the area of concealment, towards the end of a meeting with police on 18th July. They went running in Krugel's highlighted area on the 20th, and she ran there again on the 23rd, and also on 23rd wrote of fear about this area. IMO the phonecall to Paiva was probably late 23rd?

[Mr Gray]

At least we've progressed from the incorrect idea that none of his statements were arguido.
But back on topic - the parents first learned of Krugel's opinion, that the child was likely to be deceased, and predicting the area of concealment, towards the end of a meeting with police on 18th July. They went running in Krugel's highlighted area on the 20th, and she ran there again on the 23rd, and also on 23rd wrote of fear about this area. IMO the phonecall to Paiva was probably late 23rd?

I never said none of the statements were arguido.....none were apart from Gerry's final one...please get your facts right re my posts

[Mr Gray]

Csan you provide a cite for that ?

yes

[Alfred R Jones]

Interesting piece of deflection there Brietta ! "led to it being produced in court with probably the addition of an opinion not Lee Rainbow's to boot." Not what the evidence says.

According to Mercury we can consider the likelihood of something lost in translation in these newspaper reports, so I really wouldn't worry about it too much if I were you.

[stephen25000]

yes

Well do it.

[Mr Gray]

Well do it.

are you suffering from delusions of grandeur too...you asked a question which I answered...something you rarely do

[stephen25000]

are you suffering from delusions of grandeur too...you asked a question which I answered...something you rarely do

You said you could provide a cite, so where is it ?

[faithlilly]

According to Mercury we can consider the likelihood of something lost in translation in these newspaper reports, so I really wouldn't worry about it too much if I were you.

You do know Mercury and I aren't the same person, don't you ?

[Mr Gray]

You said you could provide a cite, so where is it ?

I said I could provide a cite...which I can... I didn't say I would......

[stephen25000]

I said I could provide a cite...which I can... I didn't say I would......

Why should anyone believe you ?

Likewise if you don't, don't ask others to do so.

[Alfred R Jones]

You do know Mercury and I aren't the same person, don't you ?

Well durr.. if I thought you were the same person I would have started the sentence "according to you..."

[Mr Gray]

Why should anyone believe you ?

Likewise if you don't, don't ask others to do so.

you never do......I may post it later to show my translation is more accurate

[stephen25000]

you never do......I may post it later to show my translation is more accurate

'You never do'.

Pure drivel.

Your translation...   

 i.e. Google translate.   

[mercury]

According to Mercury we can consider the likelihood of something lost in translation in these newspaper reports, so I really wouldn't worry about it too much if I were you.

That is not what I said, so please stop misquoting me and continually shifting the goalposts, thanks.
(It is possible you don't understand the essence of some of my posts, for that you are forgiven, if true)

[Mr Gray]

'You never do'.

Pure drivel.

Your translation...   

 i.e. Google translate.   

you misunderstand...and we are speaking the same language...my translation..as in...the one I posted...not the one I translated