Lawyers and Such

[faithlilly]

Their Fund accounts show this was not the case, the ones up to 2009 and 2010, link to them can be found in the documents and reports section at the top of this forum, under the chairmans statements

Interesting how quiet this thread as now become.

[Redblossom]

Interesting how quiet this thread as now become.

Didnt you hear the pins drop? Predictable though that mrs b asks for links and once given them runs off if they dont suit not even a courteous  thanks
 

[sadie]

Didnt you hear the pins drop? Predictable though that mrs b asks for links and once given them runs off if they dont suit not even a courteous  thanks
 

Mrs B, when in argument, does not state at the end of each post "Nite now" or "Nit nite" or whatever.... giving herself an excuse to bob down for a bit ... and then re-appear when things get easier  ... as a certain person does.

I fancy that she posted earlier that she had guests arriving, so would not be around.  ?Maybe ... you missed that?


Please correct me if I have the wrong person, but I think it was Mrs B.

[faithlilly]

Mrs B, when in argument, does not state at the end of each post "Nite now" or "Nit nite" or whatever.... giving herself an excuse to bob down for a bit ... and then re-appear when things get easier  ... as a certain person does.

I fancy that she posted earlier that she had guests arriving, so would not be around.  ?Maybe ... you missed that?


Please correct me if I have the wrong person, but I think it was Mrs B.

To be fair Redblossom posted the information on Friday therefore Mrs B has had ample time to reply.

[sadie]

Didnt you hear the pins drop? Predictable though that mrs b asks for links and once given them runs off if they dont suit not even a courteous  thanks
 

You haven't detailed the links.  Just quoting long accounts, without even a web address, is not good enough proof.


You would demand far more from us.

Lets have even playing fields please.

[faithlilly]

You haven't detailed the links.  Just quotiuing long accounts is not good enough proof

Do you doubt that John McCann claimed in the ( IIRC ) 2010 accounts that the fund had paid for the litigation in Portugal ? Would you be shocked if proof was posted ?

[sadie]

By all means post it, then it is irrefutable.

I accept that.

[sadie]

By all means post it, then it is irrefutable, up until the date of the accounts. 

I accept that.

If it shows what you say, will you then all stop bleating about the accounts NOT being transparent.  Cos that will prove that they are transparent.  OK?

[faithlilly]

If it shows what you say, will you then all stop bleating about the accounts NOT being transparent.  Cos that will prove that they are transparent.  OK?

If they were transparent then the exact amount of fund money used for the litigation would be detailed.

[faithlilly]

@ sadie

Here is the link to the 2009 and 2010 fund accounts which included John McCann's claim that the fund had paid for litigation in Portugal.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/26105585/madeleine-s-fund-accounts-march-2009

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id352.html

[sadie]

Thank you Faith, but I aint wading thru those.  You have to spell it out like we have to spell it out

If you are correct, then you will have scored a point

Not sure what point tbh

[faithlilly]

Thank you Faith, but I aint wading thru those.  You have to spell it out like we have to spell it out

If you are correct, then you will have scored a point

Not sure what point tbh

I can post the verbatim quote sadie but I'll only be accused of misquoting or taking the words out of context so best you read it from the original document. The claim is only a few pages in and I'm sure if you employ those investigative skills of yours it won't be hard to find 

[sadie]

No, I aint doing that.  I hate finance, but will look at it if you provide the absolute evidence

As we would be expected to.

If you are right, you will get your kudos.

[faithlilly]

No, I aint doing that.  I hate finance, but will look at it if you provide the absolute evidence

As we would be expected to.

If you are right, you will get your kudos.

You need go no further than John McCann's statement as chairman sadie.

Of course it's up to you if you want to read it but it will also be up to the reader to decide how much your behaviour reveals about your search for the truth.

[sadie]

Show me the actual evidence.

Whats wrong with doing that Faith?