Locally to PdL

[stephen25000]

But the Mccanns are free, evidence that something occurred in that apartment is evident. ABDUCTOR, maybe? The Mccanns were eliminated.

What occurred in the apartment ?

The case wasn't closed, merely shelved, if new evidence emerges.

Meanwhile arguido status can be invoked up to 20 years after the event.

[Benice]

No what you don't get amongst others, is that the dogs indicated something occurred in the apartment.

The results of the D.N.A. were inconclusive.

Just to remind you, ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE DOES NOT MEAN A CRIME DIDN'T OCCUR.

The abductor scenario, is just hot air, without an ounce of proof.

If you believe that -  then why do you keep claiming (ad nauseum) that as there is ''no evidence of an abduction''  - that crime didn't occur?     You can't have it both ways.

[John]

Her lawyer advised her not to respond to the questions during the arguido interview.

[Redblossom]

Her lawyer advised her not to respond to the questions during the arguido interview.

But she didnt take his advice did she but answered question 49



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1041635/The-48-questions-Kate-McCann-wouldnt-answer--did.html

[AnneGuedes]

Benice on Today at 08:58:48 AM
A 100 percent DNA match would have been 'game over' and they would know that to deny it would only be delaying the inevitable.

    The fact that they did not break down and confess but continued to insist on their innocence even after that irrefutable 'evidence' was claimed to exist, should have told Amaral that he was barking up the wrong tree.

An excellent post Benice. 

They had a very strong reason not to believe the car's supposed results..
Another mistake of inspector Amaral that served Mr and Mrs McCann.

[Cudge]

If you believe that -  then why do you keep claiming (ad nauseum) that as there is ''no evidence of an abduction''  - that crime didn't occur?     You can't have it both ways.

So I assume that this would be acceptable to Steve

ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE OF AN ABDUCTION DOES NOT MEAN  AN ABDUCTION DIDN'T OCCUR

[Benice]

So I assume that this would be acceptable to Steve

ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE OF AN ABDUCTION DOES NOT MEAN  AN ABDUCTION DIDN'T OCCUR

It must be - as he has gone to the trouble to remind us twice tonight that :

Absence of Evidence does not mean a crime didn't occur. 

[AnneGuedes]

But she didnt take his advice did she but answered question 49



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1041635/The-48-questions-Kate-McCann-wouldnt-answer--did.html

Good point ! Why did she answer this one according to you ?

[AnneGuedes]

It must be - as he has gone to the trouble to remind us twice tonight that :

Absence of Evidence does not mean a crime didn't occur.

Why don't you keep in mind what the AG said --  the crime (if any) couldn't be determined -- and stop assuming there was an abduction. Everything could have been.

[Benice]

Why don't you keep in mind what the AG said --  the crime (if any) couldn't be determined -- and stop assuming there was an abduction. Everything could have been.

Well why don't you tell me what you think happened Anne - if you don't think Madeleine was abducted.

[AnneGuedes]

Well why don't you tell me what you think happened Anne - if you don't think Madeleine was abducted.

I of course don't know, Benice, what happened to Madeleine. I find it difficult to believe she was abducted from bed, but she could have been abducted from a public place. I prefer to stick to the AG's report : we ignore the nature of the crime which resulted in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. This means that the abduction from bed is only one hypothesis, there are many others.
The trouble with the pro, isn't that they're pro (I have nothing against it) but that they only believe in the abduction from bed.

[sadie]

I of course don't know, Benice, what happened to Madeleine. I find it difficult to believe she was abducted from bed, but she could have been abducted from a public place. I prefer to stick to the AG's report : we ignore the nature of the crime which resulted in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. This means that the abduction from bed is only one hypothesis, there are many others.
The trouble with the pro, isn't that they're pro (I have nothing against it) but that they only believe in the abduction from bed.

give us some other hypotheses please Anne, with a few facts thrown in.

Am listening.

[John]

But she didnt take his advice did she but answered question 49



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1041635/The-48-questions-Kate-McCann-wouldnt-answer--did.html

Her prerogative.

[Redblossom]

Her prerogative.

Of course, to stay silent except to say yes, I am hampering the investigation if you think so, silly remark at best

Q.  Are you aware that in not answering the questions you are jeopardising the investigation, which seeks to discover what happened to your daughter?

A.  'Yes, if that’s what the investigation thinks.'

[Jazzy]

What occurred in the apartment ?

The case wasn't closed, merely shelved, if new evidence emerges.

Meanwhile arguido status can be invoked up to 20 years after the event.

A small child went missing from that apartment, the rest is police business.

The case was shelved in Portugal, but Scotland Yard are investigating now.

Amaral worked so hard to get those parents arrested for the disappearance of their child and even with his bias, he couldn't do it, there was nothing to implicate them.

Let's wait and see if the arguido status is invoked in the coming decade.