Author Topic: Is It Groundhog Day ?  (Read 51273 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline sadie

Re: Is It Groundhog Day ?
« Reply #120 on: July 09, 2013, 10:47:08 PM »
Rubbish
keela is not there to confirm eddie has alerted to blood, lesson one, if eddie only alerts to blood, then they would take samples from where he alerts! Keela is only required to find blood as back up if its there,wherever eddie alerts, ie to cadaver scent, no use confusing yourself

JEEZUZ  Red.

I dont believe it.  After all the hours spent trying to explain it by such patient people , you still in a mix up and spouting about it.
What a confused mind you have.

Offline sadie

Re: Is It Groundhog Day ?
« Reply #121 on: July 09, 2013, 11:02:36 PM »
@)(++(*

omg

Eddie the wonder dog alerts in the bedroom the living room the verandah the garden all cos of paul  gordons blood but keela doesnt, and SHES the expert singular dog trained to find blood
 @)(++(*

Ok mate, filll yer boots, ha ha funniest post of the day,

Straws + clutch + laughing

Whatever  way u try and twist it, eddie alerted to several places that keela didnt
 ERGO NOT BLOOD, its not rocket science


and if you go on to say oh well he was reacting to bitten fingernails, semen, urine, etc oh well ,thats great, he only did that in the place a child went missing and no where else but it means nothing!! You really need to  Get a grip!
Here you are again.  Twisting words ... enlarging on what Ferryman actually said.  Changing the meaning.

You should know by now that Eddie alerts to blood, and cadervescence.  Cadervescence includes cadavar odour and other bodily fluids.

What Ferryman said is totally possible.  He used a limited sample area.  Had he included the garden outside ... then his hypothesis for that area, if he chose to give one, would most probably be totally different. 

For instance that little quiet private garden of 5a would make a stopping off area for some bloke anxious to relieve himself on his way home after a drink; somewhere pretty private.

And dont laugh your sneering head off, cos I witnessed it happening in my front garden in the middle of the night. 

It only had to happen once in the months berfore hand ... and it would have been alerted to.


AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Is It Groundhog Day ?
« Reply #122 on: July 09, 2013, 11:27:34 PM »
Anne, Grimes always sent Eddie in first.   If he didn't alert, Grime didn't deploy Keela at all, because he knew that if any blood was present Eddie would have alerted.     If Eddie did alert he then sent Keela in.    If she alerted in the same place then Grime knew this could be not a cadaverscent alert, because Keela only alerted to blood.  So whenever both dogs alerted at the same place - he assumed blood.   The key fob - to which both dogs alerted, is an example.

If Keela did NOT alert at the same place, then Grime assumed Eddie may have alerted to cadaverscent.   However, because of all the different scenarios of WHY and HOW cadaverscent could be present - scenarios which would be entirely unassociated with Madeleine, and because cadaverscent can also come from material that is from living people, the alert on its own does not and cannot prove that a cadaver was ever at that place - UNLESS corroborating evidence was found.    This did not happen.

Quote from Martin Grime - for the millionth time

 My professional opinion as regards to the EVRD’s alert indications is that it is suggestive that this is ‘cadaver scent’ contaminant. This does not however suggest a motive or suspect as cross contamination could be as a result of a number of given scenarios and in any event no evidential or intelligence reliability can be made from these alerts unless they can be confirmed with corroborating evidence.
End quote

None of Eddie's single alerts were confirmed with corroborating evidence.

Why don't you believe Martin Grime?
What's bold is wrong, Benice.
Don't you understand that all cadavers smell the same ? Without residue, without blood, it's impossible to identify whose body provides the scent.This is why it has no value in court.
So Eddie smelt death, but whose death ?
« Last Edit: July 09, 2013, 11:29:08 PM by AnneGuedes »

Offline sadie

Re: Is It Groundhog Day ?
« Reply #123 on: July 09, 2013, 11:33:29 PM »
What's bold is wrong, Benice.
Don't you understand that all cadavers smell the same ? Without residue, without blood, it's impossible to identify whose body provides the scent.This is why it has no value in court.
So Eddie smelt death, but whose death ?
Eddie smelled death .... or urine, or semen or nail clippings, or any bodily fluid.  It has been gone over and over.  Please stop wumming.

Are you trying to change the subject to protect Red in post # 123 above?

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Is It Groundhog Day ?
« Reply #124 on: July 09, 2013, 11:38:41 PM »
Eddie smelled death .... or urine, or semen or nail clippings, or any bodily fluid.  It has been gone over and over.  Please stop wumming.

Are you trying to change the subject to protect Red in post # 123 above?
The idea Prof Harrison MBE called UK dogs to Algarve when temperature goes around 35°C, day AND night to bark at urine, semen or nail clippings is perfectly ridiculous.

Offline sadie

Re: Is It Groundhog Day ?
« Reply #125 on: July 09, 2013, 11:46:07 PM »
The idea Prof Harrison MBE called UK dogs to Algarve when temperature goes around 35°C, day AND night to bark at urine, semen or nail clippings is perfectly ridiculous.
It has been made clear that Eddie alerts to these things along with blood.  Why deny that?
What is missing from the equation is a body ... and there wasn't any body.
Simples

You are bashing your head against a brick wall Anne.  Time to pause and rethink.

Offline Benice

Re: Is It Groundhog Day ?
« Reply #126 on: July 10, 2013, 12:33:18 AM »
Rubbish
keela is not there to confirm eddie has alerted to blood, lesson one, if eddie only alerts to blood, then they would take samples from where he alerts! Keela is only required to find blood as back up if its there,wherever eddie alerts, ie to cadaver scent, no use confusing yourself

I'm not the one who is confused Red.   I have never said Eddie only alerts to blood.    Both dogs alerted to blood.   But Eddie also alerted to cadaverscent. 

When Eddie alerted Grime had no way of knowing whether he was alerting to blood or cadaverscent as he was trained to alert to both,  so he then sent  Keela in knowing that she only alerted to blood.    If she also alerted that confirmed that blood was in the place where Eddie alerted.       However,  it did not confirm that cadaverscent was present because she was not trained to alert to that particular odour - only to blood.




The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is It Groundhog Day ?
« Reply #127 on: July 10, 2013, 12:47:56 AM »
I'm not the one who is confused Red.   I have never said Eddie only alerts to blood.    Both dogs alerted to blood.   But Eddie also alerted to cadaverscent. 

When Eddie alerted Grime had no way of knowing whether he was alerting to blood or cadaverscent as he was trained to alert to both,  so he then sent  Keela in knowing that she only alerted to blood.    If she also alerted that confirmed that blood was in the place where Eddie alerted.       However,  it did not confirm that cadaverscent was present because she was not trained to alert to that particular odour - only to blood.

Eddie alerted in the McCann's bedroom, Keela didn't, therefore Eddie must have alerted to cadaver scent. It really is that simple.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Benice

Re: Is It Groundhog Day ?
« Reply #128 on: July 10, 2013, 12:57:52 AM »
Eddie alerted in the McCann's bedroom, Keela didn't, therefore Eddie must have alerted to cadaver scent. It really is that simple.

I'm not disagreeing with that Faith.   But without corroborating evidence it does not prove that a cadaver was ever in the bedroom.   The scent could have been present for a number of reasons none of which had any connection to Madeleine.   
The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is It Groundhog Day ?
« Reply #129 on: July 10, 2013, 12:59:23 AM »
I'm not disagreeing with that Faith.   But without corroborating evidence it does not prove that a cadaver was ever in the bedroom.   The scent could have been present for a number of reasons none of which had any connection to Madeleine.

Can you suggest some ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Benice

Re: Is It Groundhog Day ?
« Reply #130 on: July 10, 2013, 01:09:15 AM »
Benice:

Anne, Grimes always sent Eddie in first.

Ah!

There are always exceptions.

In the gym, Keela was deployed first, and didn't react!Then Eddie was deployed.

What the hell was Eddie looking for?

And what was Eddie expected to find that he didn't find in the prior inspection at the villa, where all clothes were present and on site?

Well Ferryman  - I didn't know that.     I was going by Grime's comments regarding other places (I can't remember where at the moment) where he states that because Eddie made no alerts at all -  the CSI dog i.e. Keela was not deployed.     I'm not absolutely sure, but I think he does state somewhere (maybe in one of the videos - or in one of his reports ) that he sends Eddie in first.   But I can't vouch for that - it's just from memory.



The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline Benice

Re: Is It Groundhog Day ?
« Reply #131 on: July 10, 2013, 01:20:54 AM »
Can you suggest some ?

It could be from a scent left by something buried underground decades ago.

It could be by scent transferrence from any number of people entering the apartment who may have been in contact with a cadaver elsewhere.

It could be scent from body 'bits' from living people which had once been deposited there.
The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline DCI

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2585
  • Total likes: 6
  • Why are some folks so sick in the head!!!
Re: Is It Groundhog Day ?
« Reply #132 on: July 10, 2013, 01:26:34 AM »
09_VOLUME_IXa 09-Processo 9 pages 2473 to 2483
 Eddie & Keela Martin Grimes Report
 August 2007
 OPERATION TASK CANINE SEARCH REPORT
 
Personal Profile
 
I am a 'retired' police officer, formally a senior instructor at the South Yorkshire Police dog training establishment.
 
I have 35 years experience in the training of dogs both within the police service and in the public sector.
 
I specialise in the development and training of specialist search dogs to include narcotics, explosives, currency, human remains, blood and semen.
 
I am the Special Advisor to The U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, in relation to their Canine Forensic Program.
 
I am a U.K.A.C.P.O. (Association of Chief Police Officers, England and Wales) accredited police dog training instructor. I am a Subject Matter Expert in forensic canine search and on the N.P.I.A. (National Policing Improvement Agency) Expert Advisers database.
 
I advise Domestic and International Law enforcement agencies on the operational deployment of Police Dogs in the role of Homicide investigation.
 
I develop methods of detecting forensically recoverable evidence by the use of dogs and facilitate training.
 
I am regularly deployed to homicide cases within my portfolio and form a 'Specialist Canine Homicide Search Team' including the S.A.M dog teams from Dyfed Powys and USA.
 
I have trained and handle two operational specialist search dogs:
 •'Eddie' is a 7-year-old English Springer spaniel dog who is trained as an Enhanced Victim Recovery Dog (EVRD).
   
•'Keela' is a three-year old English Springer spaniel bitch who is trained as an Human blood search dog (C.S.I. dog).
 OPERATION TASK CANINE DEPLOYMENTS 1-8 AUGUST 2007
 
On the instruction of The PJ Director, The Portuguese police kept all search records concerning the deployment of the search dogs. All dog searches were recorded by video.
 
The following searches were conducted:
 •Five apartments at a complex in Praia Da Luz.
 •Mr. Murat's property at Pria Da Luz.Mr.
 •McCann's Villa at Pria Da Luz ( Present occupancy).
 •Articles of clothing from Mr. McCann's residence.
 •Western beach Pria da Luz.
 •Eastern Beach Pria Da Luz.
 •10 Vehicles screened at Portimao.
 
CANINE SEARCHES AT FIVE APARTMENTS AT PRIA DA LUZ.
 All five apartments were searched using the EVRD. The only alert indications were at apartment 5a, the reported scene.
 
The EVRD alerted in the:
•Rear bedroom of the apartment in the immediate right hand corner by the door.
 •Living room, behind sofa.
 •Veranda outside parent's bedroom.
 •Garden area directly under veranda.
 
My observation of the dog's behaviour in this instance was that the dog's behaviour changed immediately upon opening the front door to the apartment. He will normally remain in the sit position until released and tasked to search. On this occasion he broke the stay and entered the apartment with an above average interest. His behaviour was such that I believed him to be 'in scent' and I therefore allowed him to free search without direction to allow him to identify the source of his interest. He did so alerting in the rear bedroom.
 
I released him from this and tasked him to continue to search. He did so alerting in an area to the rear of the sofa in the lounge.
 
The dog's behaviour for these alerts led me to the following opinions:
 
The first alert was given with the dogs head in the air without a positive area being identified. This is the alert given by him when there is no tangible evidence to be located only the remaining scent.
 
The second alert was one where a definitive area was evident. The CSI dog was therefore deployed who gave specific alert indications to specific areas on the tiled floor area behind the sofa and on the curtain in the area that was in contact with the floor behind the sofa. This would indicate to the likely presence of human blood.
 
The forensic science support officers were then deployed to recover items for laboratory analysis.
 
There were no alert indications from the remaining properties. I did however see the dog search in the kitchen waste bins. These contained meat foodstuffs including pork and did not result in any false alert response.
 
CANINE SEARCH OF MR MURAT'S PROPERTY.
 
The property was subjected to a search for human remains or blood stained articles. The outside of property was stripped of vegetation and after the ground being probed was searched by the EVRD dog. The inside of the property was then searched by the dog. There were no alert indications and no human remains were located.
 
CANINE SEARCH OF MR McCANN'S VILLA, PRESENT OCCUPANCY.
 
The villa interior, garden, and all property within were searched by the EVRD. The only alert indication given was when the dog located a pink cuddly toy in the villas lounge. The CSI dog did not alert to the toy when screened separately.
 
It is my view that it is possible that the EVRD is alerting to cadaver scent contamination. No evidential or intelligence reliability can be made from this alert unless it can be confirmed with corroborating evidence.

 

BOXES OF CLOTHING 1 PROPERTY FORM MR McCANN'S RESIDENCE.
 
At a suitable venue numerous boxes of clothing 1 property taken from the McCann present residence were screened using both the EVRD and the CSI dog. The venue was screened by both dogs prior to introducing clothing / property. Neither gave an alert indication. The screening then took place with the contents of each box being placed around the room in turn. The process was recorded by video and written records were taken by PJ officers.
 
The only alert indication was by the EVRD on clothing from one of the boxes. I am not in possession of the details as these were recorded by the PJ officers present.
 
It is my view that it is possible that the EVRD is alerting to 'a cadaver scent' contaminant. No evidential or intelligence reliability can be made from this alert unless it can be confirmed with corroborating evidence.
 
WESTERN BEACH
 
The beach above the waterline was searched. This extended to areas of fallen rock and the cliff face as far as the dog could negotiate the incline. There were no alert indications.
 
EASTERN BEACH
 
The beach above the waterline was searched. This extended to areas of fallen rock and the cliff face as far as the dog could negotiate the incline. There were no alert indications.
 
CANINE VEHICLE SEARCHES.
 
Ten vehicles were screened in an underground multi storey car park at Portimao. The vehicles, of which I did not know the owner details, were parked on an empty floor with 20-30 feet between each. The vehicle placement video recording and management of the process was conducted by the PJ. The EVRD was then tasked to search the area. When passing a vehicle I now know to be hired and in the possession of the McCann family, the dog's behaviour changed substantially. This then produced an alert indication at the lower part of the drivers door where the dog was biting and barking. I recognise this behaviour as the dog indicating scent emitting from the inside of the vehicle through the seal around the door.
 
This vehicle was then subjected to a full physical examination by the PJ and no human remains were found. The CSI dog was then tasked to screen the vehicle. An alert indication was forthcoming from the rear driver's side of the boot area. Forensic samples were taken by the PJ and forwarded to a forensic laboratory in the U.K.
 
It is my view that it is possible that the EVRD is alerting to 'cadaver scent' contaminant or human blood scent. No evidential or intelligence reliability can be made from this alert unless it can be confirmed with corroborating evidence. The remainder of the vehicles were screened by the EVRD without any interest being shown. Therefore the CSI dog was not further deployed.
 

SUMMARY
 
The tasking for this operation was as per my normal Standard Operating Procedures. The dogs are deployed as search assets to secure evidence and locate human remains or Human blood.
 
The dogs only alerted to property associated with the McCann family. The dog alert indications MUST be corroborated if to establish their findings as evidence.
 
Therefore in this particular case, as no human remains were located, the only alert indications that may become corroborated are those that the CSI dog indicated by forensic laboratory analysis.
 
My professional opinion as regards to the EVRD's alert indications is that it is suggestive that this is 'cadaver scent' contaminant. This does not however suggest a motive or suspect as cross contamination could be as a result of a number of given scenarios and in any event no evidential or intelligence reliability can be made from these alerts unless they can be confirmed with corroborating evidence.



« Last Edit: July 10, 2013, 01:28:58 AM by DCI »
Kate's 500 Mile Cycle Challenge

https://www.justgiving.com/KateMcCann/

Offline Benice

Re: Is It Groundhog Day ?
« Reply #133 on: July 10, 2013, 01:27:40 AM »
What's bold is wrong, Benice.
Don't you understand that all cadavers smell the same ? Without residue, without blood, it's impossible to identify whose body provides the scent.This is why it has no value in court.
So Eddie smelt death, but whose death ?

It's not me you are claiming is wrong Anne, it's Martin Grime.   The detection of cadaverscent without a body being found does not prove that the scent is from a dead person.    Eddie smelt decaying human remains - which could be from body parts/fluids from living people.
The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline sadie

Re: Is It Groundhog Day ?
« Reply #134 on: July 10, 2013, 01:43:47 AM »
BUMPED to bring this important document over page into view

DCI
« Reply #134 on: Today at 01:26:34 AM »Quote09_VOLUME_IXa 09-Processo 9 pages 2473 to 2483
 Eddie & Keela Martin Grimes Report
 August 2007
 OPERATION TASK CANINE SEARCH REPORT
 
Personal Profile
 
I am a 'retired' police officer, formally a senior instructor at the South Yorkshire Police dog training establishment.
 
I have 35 years experience in the training of dogs both within the police service and in the public sector.
 
I specialise in the development and training of specialist search dogs to include narcotics, explosives, currency, human remains, blood and semen.
 
I am the Special Advisor to The U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, in relation to their Canine Forensic Program.
 
I am a U.K.A.C.P.O. (Association of Chief Police Officers, England and Wales) accredited police dog training instructor. I am a Subject Matter Expert in forensic canine search and on the N.P.I.A. (National Policing Improvement Agency) Expert Advisers database.
 
I advise Domestic and International Law enforcement agencies on the operational deployment of Police Dogs in the role of Homicide investigation.
 
I develop methods of detecting forensically recoverable evidence by the use of dogs and facilitate training.
 
I am regularly deployed to homicide cases within my portfolio and form a 'Specialist Canine Homicide Search Team' including the S.A.M dog teams from Dyfed Powys and USA.
 
I have trained and handle two operational specialist search dogs:
 •'Eddie' is a 7-year-old English Springer spaniel dog who is trained as an Enhanced Victim Recovery Dog (EVRD).
   
•'Keela' is a three-year old English Springer spaniel bitch who is trained as an Human blood search dog (C.S.I. dog).
 OPERATION TASK CANINE DEPLOYMENTS 1-8 AUGUST 2007
 
On the instruction of The PJ Director, The Portuguese police kept all search records concerning the deployment of the search dogs. All dog searches were recorded by video.
 
The following searches were conducted:
 •Five apartments at a complex in Praia Da Luz.
 •Mr. Murat's property at Pria Da Luz.Mr.
 •McCann's Villa at Pria Da Luz ( Present occupancy).
 •Articles of clothing from Mr. McCann's residence.
 •Western beach Pria da Luz.
 •Eastern Beach Pria Da Luz.
 •10 Vehicles screened at Portimao.
 
CANINE SEARCHES AT FIVE APARTMENTS AT PRIA DA LUZ.
 All five apartments were searched using the EVRD. The only alert indications were at apartment 5a, the reported scene.
 
The EVRD alerted in the:
•Rear bedroom of the apartment in the immediate right hand corner by the door.
 •Living room, behind sofa.
 •Veranda outside parent's bedroom.
 •Garden area directly under veranda.
 
My observation of the dog's behaviour in this instance was that the dog's behaviour changed immediately upon opening the front door to the apartment. He will normally remain in the sit position until released and tasked to search. On this occasion he broke the stay and entered the apartment with an above average interest. His behaviour was such that I believed him to be 'in scent' and I therefore allowed him to free search without direction to allow him to identify the source of his interest. He did so alerting in the rear bedroom.
 
I released him from this and tasked him to continue to search. He did so alerting in an area to the rear of the sofa in the lounge.
 
The dog's behaviour for these alerts led me to the following opinions:
 
The first alert was given with the dogs head in the air without a positive area being identified. This is the alert given by him when there is no tangible evidence to be located only the remaining scent.
 
The second alert was one where a definitive area was evident. The CSI dog was therefore deployed who gave specific alert indications to specific areas on the tiled floor area behind the sofa and on the curtain in the area that was in contact with the floor behind the sofa. This would indicate to the likely presence of human blood.
 
The forensic science support officers were then deployed to recover items for laboratory analysis.
 
There were no alert indications from the remaining properties. I did however see the dog search in the kitchen waste bins. These contained meat foodstuffs including pork and did not result in any false alert response.
 
CANINE SEARCH OF MR MURAT'S PROPERTY.
 
The property was subjected to a search for human remains or blood stained articles. The outside of property was stripped of vegetation and after the ground being probed was searched by the EVRD dog. The inside of the property was then searched by the dog. There were no alert indications and no human remains were located.
 
CANINE SEARCH OF MR McCANN'S VILLA, PRESENT OCCUPANCY.
 
The villa interior, garden, and all property within were searched by the EVRD. The only alert indication given was when the dog located a pink cuddly toy in the villas lounge. The CSI dog did not alert to the toy when screened separately.
 
It is my view that it is possible that the EVRD is alerting to cadaver scent contamination. No evidential or intelligence reliability can be made from this alert unless it can be confirmed with corroborating evidence.


BOXES OF CLOTHING 1 PROPERTY FORM MR McCANN'S RESIDENCE.
 
At a suitable venue numerous boxes of clothing 1 property taken from the McCann present residence were screened using both the EVRD and the CSI dog. The venue was screened by both dogs prior to introducing clothing / property. Neither gave an alert indication. The screening then took place with the contents of each box being placed around the room in turn. The process was recorded by video and written records were taken by PJ officers.
 
The only alert indication was by the EVRD on clothing from one of the boxes. I am not in possession of the details as these were recorded by the PJ officers present.
 
It is my view that it is possible that the EVRD is alerting to 'a cadaver scent' contaminant. No evidential or intelligence reliability can be made from this alert unless it can be confirmed with corroborating evidence.

WESTERN BEACH
 
The beach above the waterline was searched. This extended to areas of fallen rock and the cliff face as far as the dog could negotiate the incline. There were no alert indications.
 
EASTERN BEACH
 
The beach above the waterline was searched. This extended to areas of fallen rock and the cliff face as far as the dog could negotiate the incline. There were no alert indications.
 
CANINE VEHICLE SEARCHES.
 
Ten vehicles were screened in an underground multi storey car park at Portimao. The vehicles, of which I did not know the owner details, were parked on an empty floor with 20-30 feet between each. The vehicle placement video recording and management of the process was conducted by the PJ. The EVRD was then tasked to search the area. When passing a vehicle I now know to be hired and in the possession of the McCann family, the dog's behaviour changed substantially. This then produced an alert indication at the lower part of the drivers door where the dog was biting and barking. I recognise this behaviour as the dog indicating scent emitting from the inside of the vehicle through the seal around the door.
 
This vehicle was then subjected to a full physical examination by the PJ and no human remains were found. The CSI dog was then tasked to screen the vehicle. An alert indication was forthcoming from the rear driver's side of the boot area. Forensic samples were taken by the PJ and forwarded to a forensic laboratory in the U.K.
 
It is my view that it is possible that the EVRD is alerting to 'cadaver scent' contaminant or human blood scent. No evidential or intelligence reliability can be made from this alert unless it can be confirmed with corroborating evidence. The remainder of the vehicles were screened by the EVRD without any interest being shown. Therefore the CSI dog was not further deployed.
 


SUMMARY
 
The tasking for this operation was as per my normal Standard Operating Procedures. The dogs are deployed as search assets to secure evidence and locate human remains or Human blood.
 
The dogs only alerted to property associated with the McCann family. The dog alert indications MUST be corroborated if to establish their findings as evidence.
 
Therefore in this particular case, as no human remains were located, the only alert indications that may become corroborated are those that the CSI dog indicated by forensic laboratory analysis.
 
My professional opinion as regards to the EVRD's alert indications is that it is suggestive that this is 'cadaver scent' contaminant. This does not however suggest a motive or suspect as cross contamination could be as a result of a number of given scenarios and in any event no evidential or intelligence reliability can be made from these alerts unless they can be confirmed with corroborating evidence.