Dr. Roberts latest.

[Carana]

I fear you might be right

I am astounded that more than two years,  and millions of pounds later,  we are told that the objective is  'resolution'  rather than  solving  the case  !

What does that  MEAN, exactly  ? 

Are we to be told that  Scotland Yard have  'resolved'  what happened to Madeleine,  without any proof or perpetrator brought to justice  ?

I guess we'll have to see what transpires.

Is there a semantic nuance?

Discovering what happened to her may not equate to bringing anyone to justice. Or vice versa.

[AnneGuedes]

What does that  MEAN, exactly  ? 

I'm hopeful that when we pursue those lines of inquiry that we'll be able to bring some sort of resolution. Whether we'll be able to solve it is a different issue
Well it seems we can't spare an exegesis..
"Hope" (not ambition, not objective) of "some sort of resolution" as identifying the nature of the crime at least.
About "solving", no hope. As Dr Roberts says, "the interrogation of thirty-eight over the disappearance of Madeleine McCann can only serve a true purpose if the child was actually abducted in the first place."
After more than 2 years and millions of pounds spent ? Ah mais c'est la vie, as Angelo would say.

[sadie]

Bumped with photograph and additional words


Quote from: Chinagirl on Today at 07:37:16 AM

the nephilim giants  What is this?  And what "photographic evidence is demonstrably fake?".

Oh that is the photo of no-neck Madeleine


Gotta be that photo.  The [ censored word] spent weeks / months mulling over that one.  Photo was photoshopped, they said.  What had happened to Madeleines neck?

Very important piece of evidence,that CG !  Didn'tcha know?

It proved that Madeleine was already dead before May3rd they said, cos that photo showed her with no-neck.

Then they put up photographs showing Gerry in the same place, but no Madeleine at his side.  Now that was photoshopped ... and by very viscious [ censored word] spreading libel and propaganda.






Idiots ... stupid lot ..... and bullying liars.[/img]

[Carana]

I'm hopeful that when we pursue those lines of inquiry that we'll be able to bring some sort of resolution. Whether we'll be able to solve it is a different issue
Well it seems we can't spare an exegesis..
"Hope" (not ambition, not objective) of "some sort of resolution" as identifying the nature of the crime at least.
About "solving", no hope. As Dr Roberts says, "the interrogation of thirty-eight over the disappearance of Madeleine McCann can only serve a true purpose if the child was actually abducted in the first place."
After more than 2 years and millions of pounds spent ? Ah mais c'est la vie, as Angelo would say.

Who exactly is Dr Martin Roberts?

[DCI]

Who exactly is Dr Martin Roberts?

Nobody, Carana. He's just off the McCann Files.

[DCI]

Quote
There was only one key to the apartment and the abductor did not have it.
End quote


If there was only one key how did the cleaners get in?

Through the window, perhaps? 

[Carana]

Nobody, Carana. He's just off the McCann Files.

So why would any MD or PhD graduate regularly post "exclusively" on mccanfiles in their real name without any backup in terms of - at least - authenticity?

[Carana]

Through the window, perhaps? 

"Through the window" may well be less related to how the child left the apartment than what happened to judicial secrecy...

[sadie]

"Through the window" may well be less related to how the child left the apartment than what happened to judicial secrecy...

Think DCI was referring to the cleaners getting in thru the windows, but I get you point.

Judicial secrecy seems to have leaked thru everywhere, every crack ./.. but only when it was something to discredit the Mccanns.  had you noticed?

[Carana]

Think DCI was referring to the cleaners getting in thru the windows, but I get you point.

Judicial secrecy seems to have leaked thru everywhere, every crack ./.. but only when it was something to discredit the Mccanns.  had you noticed?

It would be hard not to...

[Luz]

Think DCI was referring to the cleaners getting in thru the windows, but I get you point.

Judicial secrecy seems to have leaked thru everywhere, every crack ./.. but only when it was something to discredit the Mccanns.  had you noticed?

Really?
It worked very well for the McCann to put their family and friends spilling all the dirt they could think of to the journos. On the 4th of May, while hundreds of portuguese civilians and hundreds of police, firemen, army, navy,..were searching for Madeleine, relatives were telling the media that poooor Kate and Gerry were desperate because there was nobody doing anything. Well, they were busy - after being questioned by the police they found time for tennis, but this didn't come out on the papers.

[Carana]

Really?
It worked very well for the McCann to put their family and friends spilling all the dirt they could think of to the journos. On the 4th of May, while hundreds of portuguese civilians and hundreds of police, firemen, army, navy,..were searching for Madeleine, relatives were telling the media that poooor Kate and Gerry were desperate because there was nobody doing anything. Well, they were busy - after being questioned by the police they found time for tennis, but this didn't come out on the papers.

If the fact that Kate and Gerry had jogged up the hill and that Gerry eventually played a game of tennis had never appeared in the press ... how come I knew about this?

I hope that you'll never find yourself in a situation in which you need temporary relief from stress due to the situation and constant press attention.

[DCI]

Really?
It worked very well for the McCann to put their family and friends spilling all the dirt they could think of to the journos. On the 4th of May, while hundreds of portuguese civilians and hundreds of police, firemen, army, navy,..were searching for Madeleine, relatives were telling the media that poooor Kate and Gerry were desperate because there was nobody doing anything. Well, they were busy - after being questioned by the police they found time for tennis, but this didn't come out on the papers.

Don't tell such blatant lies, Luz, you are known for it. You don't seem to remember being on 3A's, and what you posted, funny that!

[sadie]

Don't tell such blatant lies, Luz, you are known for it. You don't seem to remember being on 3A's, and what you posted, funny that!

Awww ... so Luz is telling lies here, then.   

Hmm ...... will have to rethink my assessment of him/her on the PdL thread.



I hate liars.

NB.  I think that it was in this post and in the one, by DCI above, that proof that Luz had been telling lies was shown using a post from Missing Madeleine IIRC.  John has now removed that proof, but as others have seen it, I leave this post unaltered . 
By sheer good fortune, as I was closing down just, I found that I had it recorded in my computer
http://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t15017p45-british-former-inspector-calls-for-a-reconstruction#310031  Last post ...... and the post that has been whitewashed out for some reason .....  is by Luz himself!     

Please John NEVER EVER AGAIN put me in the position that you have here.
 
Here stood a post that proved that Luz lied; then you removed that proof, without a clear acknowledgement.  That is a dreadful unforgiveable thing to do to me.

[Carana]

I'm still confused.

Why would a certain "Dr Martin Roberts" present what may be assumed to be a professional analysis of certain aspects as "exclusives" on a blog*  ... without any confirmation of identity, nor credentials as to this person's qualifications and experience?


Doesn't anyone else find that a bit odd?


* Someone else's blog... in theory.