Would You Adam and Eve It ?

[Redblossom]

I don't break the rules of this forum and have no "watched" against my name.  I have no idea what you are referring to when you say "your mate".

Simples.

Just take time to readback  its not rocket science,, bye now


 

[Carana]

As we say in the UK, a load of cobblers on most fronts
 



Eta what do you mean Carana by *being held*?By who?

If she is alive, presumably someone must be holding / hiding her somewhere.

[faithlilly]

I really can't be bothered to discuss it with you.  You are rude and ignorant, and your insults are of no importance to me, anymore than is your opinion.

Now there's a suprise 

[Eleanor]

So, absolutely no point in me attempting to reply.

But I don't think that I suggested that such people would abuse a child just because they desperately wanted a child.  I would hope that they wouldn't.  But then I hope.

[sadie]

I was addressing Eleanor who said this happens and asked her for evidence, she doesnt think this is media rubbish, perhaps take it up with her, I havemade nothing of this media rubbish except to say it IS rubbish, so why you are fabricating and twisting my posts is beyond me, in the meantime, do not address me again, thank you in advance,but just in case you do, I will stick you on ignore so as not to be badgered, and constantly,goaded,cheers big ears
 


Reminder of forum rules, as Im sure you have been warned, as I have, so take heed and behave


Reminder to all members!


Forum Rules


You agree, through your use of this forum, that you will not post any material which is false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening.....

BIG EARS here [calling me big ears is not abuse, is it?  lol]

So how have I harrassed, been abusive, false, defamatory, or inaccurate?

Explanation please


The silly thing is Red that I actually agreed with you on that post.  I too think it is media hype

And altho I will read the media, much of it is unreliable.  I prefer facts.

[sadie]

So, absolutely no point in me attempting to reply.

But I don't think that I suggested that such people would abuse a child just because they desperately wanted a child.  I would hope that they wouldn't.  But then I hope.

Well most people who want a child so desperately would not abuse it.  That's for sure

Like you, I hope too.

[Eleanor]

Well most people who want a child so desperately would not abuse it.  That's for sure

Like you, I hope too.

That is the difference, Sadie.  Some people hope and some people don't.

[faithlilly]

That is the difference, Sadie.  Some people hope and some people don't.

And some people are realists.

[sadie]

And some people are realists.

All sorts of people Faith ... as we have witnessed on here

Some people think they are realists here, but in actual fact they are not, because they go against the evidence and against the Official PT and SY conclusions.

So they are negative fantacists really

dont you agree?

[John]

I doubt the 5 miles up reference has little to do with satellite imagery as satellites orbit at about 250 miles above the earth.    Its also quite a camera they refer to which can read a car number plate from above in the dark.  Never mind, it is in the Press so it must be true.   

[Redblossom]

If she is alive, presumably someone must be holding / hiding her somewhere.

Yes, obviously.How does that explain the Mccanns mantra that there is not a shred of evidence that she has come to any harm? A mantra that was repeated almost daily from the first week for years after. Surely they could only say that if they believed that she was snatched for or by a loving childless couple. And if that was the case why was Gerry Mccann saying he thought paedophiles had taken her barely an hour after the alarm was raised? And why did that thought come into his mind then and not before as a possibility of a danger that she might be in by being left alone in an open apartment on the corner of a street accessible by anyone, let alone the dozens of dangers babies and toddlers can encounter when left unattended, and it sounds even worse when he admitted he never ever made a physical check, in some 30 or so checks on that holiday he made a single visual check

And to think they refused to book a babysitter because they disnt trust strangers!

Sorry to bring a few strands of the story together, but when you do it makes less sense





And even if she was taken for *benign* purposes, its still harm, not only being taken away, but most certainly living as a recluse with her *new family* seeing as half the world and its wife were aware of her.

ETA No one has answered me on previous questions I asked regarding  three yr olds being taken to live in a lair as the Mccanns PI Dave Edgar said he believed she was within 10 miles of PDL. Her case being likened by many including the Mccanns  to teenagers and adult  women being abducted and held as sex slaves and breeding machines and who later escaped or were found years later does not compute. I have never ever heard of any case like that, perhaps someone can link to one, I wont hold my breath.

BBL or tomorrow now

[sadie]

Yes, obviously.How does that explain the Mccanns mantra that there is not a shred of evidence that she has come to any harm? A mantra that was repeated almost daily from the first week for years after. Surely they could only say that if they believed that she was snatched for or by a loving childless couple. And if that was the case why was Gerry Mccann saying he thought paedophiles had taken her barely an hour after the alarm was raised? And why did that thought come into his mind then and not before as a possibility of a danger that she might be in by being left alone in an open apartment on the corner of a street accessible by anyone, let alone the dozens of dangers babies and toddlers can encounter when left unattended, and it sounds even worse when he admitted he never ever made a physical check, in some 30 or so checks on that holiday he made a single visual check

And to think they refused to book a babysitter because they disnt trust strangers!

Sorry to bring a few strands of the story together, but when you do it makes less sense





And even if she was taken for *benign* purposes, its still harm, not only being taken away, but most certainly living as a recluse with her *new family* seeing as half the world and its wife were aware of her.

ETA No one has answered me on previous questions I asked regarding  three yr olds being taken to live in a lair as the Mccanns PI Dave Edgar said he believed she was within 10 miles of PDL. Her case being likened by many including the Mccanns  to teenagers and adult  women being abducted and held as sex slaves and breeding machines and who later escaped or were found years later does not compute. I have never ever heard of any case like that, perhaps someone can link to one, I wont hold my breath.

BBL or tomorrow now

Hope Red

HOPE!

You sound as tho you have enjoyed saying all these things, that many of us worry about, but take care not to hurt sensibilities by going on about.
There is absolutely NO INDICATION that Madeleine is dead.  NOR ANY  INDICATIONS  that she is in the child market, like there were with poor Rui Pedro Mendoca

And every HOPE that we are looking for a findable living young girl.


Red. Do you HOPE that she will be found living and well?

[stephen25000]

Hope Red

HOPE!

You sound as tho you have enjoyed saying all these things, that many of us worry about, but take care not to hurt sensibilities by going on about.
There is absolutely NO INDICATION that Madeleine is dead.  NOR ANY  INDICATIONS  that she is in the child market, like there were with poor Rui Pedro Mendoca

And every HOPE that we are looking for a findable living young girl.


Red. Do you HOPE that she will be found living and well?

Cliches, cliches and yet more cliches.

She came to harm in the apartment.

Haven't you got that through your head yet ?

[sadie]

Cliches, cliches and yet more cliches.

She came to harm in the apartment.

Haven't you got that through your head yet ?

Offer some proof Stephen.

.... anything sensible and I will look at it.




NB You will have to convince SY and the AG too.  They believe that The Mccanns are innocent of any criminal act.

[stephen25000]

Offer some proof Stephen.

.... anything sensible and I will look at it.




NB You will have to convince SY and the AG too.  They believe that The Mccanns are innocent of any criminal act.

Don't you get simple logic ?

Whatever fate occurred to Madeleine took place in the apartment. That's where she disappeared, or is that too simple foryou to grasp ?