Did Rebelo Believe That David Payne Visited the McCann's Apartment ?

[Redblossom]

Why did they suppress Mrs and Mr Payne visit at 19h in the 5A, as stated by PO Mike Marshall?

I hope SY have looked into this  anomily and what it means!

[Carana]

@ DCI

There were two versions floating around. One appears to have been a leaked draft dating from 20 June.

[Carana]

Why did they suppress Mrs and Mr Payne visit at 19h in the 5A, as stated by PO Mike Marshall?

Who suppressed what from whom?

[Redblossom]

No, don't think so, Red.

The translation on Pamalam's site corresponds to the draft version. The Jpgs of the Pt original along the left seem to be the final version.

The pdf that you posted earlier (from the same site) seems to be the 20 June draft. I hadn't seen that version before you posted it.

the translation was made on the original draft, someone assumed it was the same document as the stamped final one, it looked like the duck walked like it quacked like it, whats the problem? At the end of the day is it such a big deal? A slight time difference about wondering what  happened at the mccanns flat that evening?

[AnneGuedes]

Who suppressed what from whom?

Don't know who, don't know why, but here is what
24.10.2007 -- Volume XIII, Pages 3909-3915

[Carana]

the translation was made on the original draft, someone assumed it was the same document as the stamped final one, it looked like the duck walked like it quacked like it, whats the problem? At the end of the day is it such a big deal? A slight time difference about wondering what  happened at the mccanns flat that evening?

I didn't start the thread...

[DCI]

no DCI do keep up, it is obvious a different report was being translated, and PROPERLY

obviously someone assumed the final report was the same as the original  *draft* one and attached the jpeg images to the translation made for mccannpjfiles

ps we are talking about the final Pj report not the PPs legal summary whichis irrelevant here

Don't need to keep up


FROM THE ORIGINAL DVD FINAL REPORT, PAGE 4582

[Redblossom]

I didn't start the thread...

but you got involved in it

The op was asking a valid queation, based on the english translations, i dont expect her to read portuguese

[Redblossom]

Don't need to keep up


FROM THE ORIGINAL DVD FINAL REPORT, PAGE 4582

We know all that, please read back as you have lost the plot

[Carana]

but you got involved in it

The op was asking a valid queation, based on the english translations, i dont expect her to read portuguese

I was just trying to help answer the question that was asked.

[Carana]

We know all that, please read back as you have lost the plot

DCI was just corroborating the version on the DVD.

[Redblossom]

I was just trying to help answer the question that was asked.

Ok, so sorry, i forget how helpful you are on many threads, your knowledge  of the files is very good, my apologies

[Redblossom]

DCI was just corroborating the version on the DVD.

Yes but he hasnt cottoned on it seems, he didnt need  to corroborate anything as it was dealt with before, you dont need to speak or apologise  for him

[DCI]

but you got involved in it

The op was asking a valid queation, based on the english translations, i dont expect her to read portuguese

So could you site the original from the DVD files and not McCannpjfiles?. Thats the only place that has different  times to the original..

[Carana]

Yes but he hasnt cottoned on it seems, he didnt need  to corroborate anything as it was dealt with before, you dont need to speak or apologise  for him

I wasn't. DCI corroborated the more recent document, which seemed more authentic, which was also on mccannpfiles.


Much of the draft may be correct, but some details may not be what was in the final version (thanks to the OP for pointing that out).