Author Topic: So if the abduction occurred at 9.15pm lets look at the movements.  (Read 34883 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline John

Let's assume for a minute that there was an abduction. 

Gerry is adamant that when he checked the three children at around 9.10pm that he had sight of Madeleine.  Taking this at face value then we must accept that she was still in the apartment at that time.

If Jane Tanner is correct and she actually had a visual with the abductor at 9.15pm and while Gerry McCann was still stood on the street just below the patio gate then the window of opportunity was really tight.

This leads me to believe that the apartment and the parents movements were being monitored.  When Matt did the first check he simply walked to a point in the car park where he could listen at the shutter. I have a feeling that this wasn't picked up by the abductors and that they were monitoring the movements up to and from the patio door.  When they saw Gerry go in at about 9.12pm to do the check they would have been ready to pounce.  When he came out the go ahead was given and the abductor made for the front of the apartment assuming the coast was then clear and that Gerry had returned to the tapas.  We know of course that the coast was not clear, not only had Gerry stopped on the pavement but Jane Tanner was on her way to her own apartment to see Russell.

Matt did a further check after 9.30pm and talks of the room being lighter as he actually entered the apartment this time.  But how could he have known this as he hadn't been in previously?
« Last Edit: July 24, 2013, 12:13:11 AM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: So if the abduction occurred at 9.15pm lets look at the movements.
« Reply #1 on: July 23, 2013, 04:14:24 PM »
He compared it to his own bedroom.

Offline DCI

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2585
  • Total likes: 6
  • Why are some folks so sick in the head!!!
Re: So if the abduction occurred at 9.15pm lets look at the movements.
« Reply #2 on: July 23, 2013, 05:13:13 PM »
Let's assume for a minute that there was an abduction. 

Gerry is adamant that when he checked the three children at around 9.10pm that he had sight of Madeleine.  Taking this at face value then we must accept that she was still in the apartment at that time.

If Jane Tanner is correct and she actually had a visual with the abductor at 9.15pm and while Gerry McCann was still stood on the street just below the patio gate then the window of opportunity was really tight.

This leads me to believe that the apartment and the parents movements were being monitored.  When Matt did the first check he simply walked to a point in the car park where he could listen at the shutter. I have a feeling that this wasn't picked up by the abductors and that they were monitoring the movements up to and from the patio door.  When they saw Gerry go in at about 9.12pm to do the check they would have been ready to pounce.  When he came out the go ahead was given and the abductor made for the front of the apartment assuming the coast was then clear and that Gerry had returned to the tapas.  We know of course that the coast was not clear. not only had Gerry stopped on the pavement but Jane Tanner was on her way to her own apartment to see Russell.

Matt did a further check after 9.30pm and talks of the room being lighter as he actually entered the apartment this time.  But how could he have known this as he hadn't been in previously?

John, Where does Matt talks of the room being lighter? I can only find where he say's light! 
Kate's 500 Mile Cycle Challenge

https://www.justgiving.com/KateMcCann/

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: So if the abduction occurred at 9.15pm lets look at the movements.
« Reply #3 on: July 23, 2013, 05:33:25 PM »
1st statement
it seemed to him that the shutters of the bedroom window were open without knowing if the window was also open.

2nd statement
Concerning the external blinds he clarifies that he did not see if it was closed or open. He recalls having thought that in that bedroom there was more brightness than there was in his daughter's room (where the external blinds were always fully closed), adding to have had the feeling that that light was coming from the outside – making the point that both were turned in the same direction.
Consequently, he admits the possibility of the light he was perceiving was owing to the blinds being raised, denying however that he was capable of assessing the height at which it may have been.
___________
Between the first and the second, he realized the logical consequence of what he said and tried to attenuate it. But everybody will deduce the person who claimed the blinds were closed at 9, sees them lifted at 9:30 and nevertheless declares everything's ok is nothing more than irresponsible.
Why didn't the McCanns protest ? Because in fact Mr McCann showed a similar foolishness when he didn't investigate why the bedroom door was too much open ?

Offline DCI

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2585
  • Total likes: 6
  • Why are some folks so sick in the head!!!
Re: So if the abduction occurred at 9.15pm lets look at the movements.
« Reply #4 on: July 23, 2013, 06:44:36 PM »
1st statement.
Correct wording



That it seemed to him that the shutters of the parents' bedroom window were open without knowing if the window was also open.

Kate's 500 Mile Cycle Challenge

https://www.justgiving.com/KateMcCann/

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: So if the abduction occurred at 9.15pm lets look at the movements.
« Reply #5 on: July 23, 2013, 06:56:03 PM »
The gist of Oldfields statements, is that the room seemed to have more light in it that he expected it to have,based on nothing expect that his own daughters bedroom with the shutters down and door closed was in pitchblack

He did not really know why there was some light around so he could see in the Mccanns kids bedroom, he said there were various possibilities, one the shutter being slightly up, thinking it was down on his 9pm check and since his kids room is dark with the shutter down so should his room, two the moon, three a source inside the apartment behind him

If the source was from the shutters being open, would the light have come through seeing as the thicker curtains were closed? No wind, no curtains flapping, no cold felt, no slamming doors. The simplest explanation is the light source was coming through the kitchen window whose blinds were up, and where across the street to them was a street lamp. Something which he wouldnt have seen in his own flat as his kids bedroom was on the opposite side of the light source.


Relevant parts of statements here

Sorry, dont have time to edit the rogatory part

4th may statement

At around 9.25pm, the interviewee went into his apartment and Madeleine's apartment to check on the children. He states that the door of the bedroom that was occupied by Madeleine and the twins, was open and that there was enough light in the bedroom for him to see the twins in their cots. That he couldn't see the bed occupied by Madeleine, but as it was all quiet, he deduced that she was sleeping. That the light was not from an artificial source inside the apartment, but perhaps something coming from outside through the bedroom window. That it seemed to him that the shutters of the parents' bedroom window were open without knowing if the window was also open.

10th may statement

That he did not enter the bedroom where MBM and the twins were sleeping. He recalls that the bedroom door was half open, making an angle of 50 degrees. He does not know how far away he was from the bedroom door. He recalls having the perception that the window curtains - green in colour - were drawn closed but could not determine if the window was closed or open. Concerning the external blinds he clarifies that he did not see if it was closed or open. He recalls having thought that in that bedroom there was more brightness than there was in his daughter's room (where the external blinds were always fully closed), adding to have had the feeling that that light was coming from the outside - making the point that both were turned in the same direction. 

Consequently, he admits the possibility of the light he was perceiving was owing to the blinds being raised, denying however that he was capable of assessing the height at which it may have been. 

The question asked, he was sure that, at the time of his first being in the vicinity of MBM's bedroom, reported as 21h05 in the course of which he had approached the the window of that bedroom from the outside for the purpose of an auditory check, the blinds were, in his view, fully closed. 

Consequently, he is convinced that at the time of the second check the blinds were more open than on the first check, given that he considers that the light inside the bedroom, undoubtedly coming from the outside, could not have been coming through it [the blinds] if they had been fully closed.

Rogatory interview april 08

Reply "Erm, so I went to check on G**** and I stood up and Russell stood up and said he was going to go and check as well and Kate stood up and I said, you know, do you want us to go and check on, erm, do you want me to go and check on your kids, erm, and she said yes. And I think I offered at that point just because we had been together all week and we had similar routines and it just kind of seemed like a nice thing to do that would save her a journey back up and, you know, it may or it may not have been different. But, erm, I said that and she said yeah fine and she said that the patio door was open and go in through there. And there was me and Russell as well, so, erm, you know, it seemed, at the time, a very reasonable thing to do, even though it was the first time that we'd certainly done it. Also, having somebody else there with me, it sort of felt sort of more, more sort of natural and normal. So we went out and we debated about whether we'd go in first or go in later, but Russell wanted to get back because E*** had been a little bit unsettled and so we went back first and he went in and I went in to check on G**** and actually went in through the door, unlocked the door, looked in, into her room, all fine, came back out, shut the door, erm, went over to his apartment and he said that E*** had been sick so he was staying back with her. So I went back and did the check on five 'A', on Madeleine and the kids, erm, and went back through the patio entrance, so through the gate, through the patio doors, erm, there was, it was light enough to see through the apartment and there sort of a little table light on the right at the end of the sofa and when you walk into the room, you could see straight into it, because the door was open. Erm, I've spent a lot of time debating how far the door was open, from previous questioning, and, you know, it wasn't flat back against the wall, because that would have looked odd, it was just sort of halfway open, so it seemed slightly unusual that it should be so wide open, because you could see straight into the middle of the room from the angle that you approach it, because the, you've got sofas here and you've got a bookcase here and you have to come out, you've got sort of the wall of the bedroom and then it goes back where the bathroom is and then comes out again, so you've got to come out round this wall to sort of, not out round this wall, but you come in and the doorway is sort of recessed, so you can see pretty much straight into the room from the doorway back or certainly as soon as you get past that final wall. So it seemed odd to have that door open, it's certainly not something that, you know, G**** has it completely pitch black, because it seems to me that she sleeps a bit longer, erm, but some people do leave the door open and I know Russell and Jane, for E***, and L*** subsequent, also has the door slightly open, you know, they have light and they prefer that, but we've never done that with G****, so it seemed a little bit odd, but not without the realm of possibility. So I approached the room but I didn't actually go in because you could see the twins in the cots and one of the, you could see the twins in the cots because they're in with, sort of the cots were in the middle of the room with sort of a gap of about sort of maybe a foot between the two, the cots had sort of got that fabric end and sort of a mesh side, so you could see the sides and you could see them, erm, see them breathing and there were two there and it was all completely quiet. And the other things you could see in the room, there was a, there was another bed at the back underneath the window at the far side and you could see the end of the bed, another bed here. And because I was looking for, you know, well people say, well why didn't you go in the room, why didn't you check on Madeleine, you were, you said you'd go and check, but it was just that, we were just satisfying ourselves that nobody was upset and awake and crying, we didn't expect that if I checked each three beds somebody, it just wasn’t sort of something that you thought about, you just thought, you know, is somebody, you know, upset, do they want their mum or something, you can say, you know, somebody might have vomited and you wouldn't know about it, but there was, you know, nobody was awake, you thought, if something, just one, it'd be, it'd sort of feel a bit odd, you know, from the draughts, you know, when Kate went in something about the door shutting, there was, I presume, a through draught. So I just sort of went towards the doorway, I didn't step over the threshold, I didn't see Madeleine and I didn't check, I turned round and came back out, said all was quiet when I got back to the table and then we went on with food. Now the room was, we talked also in the interviews about how light the room was and whether I could see the shutters, and I can't see the shutters because the curtains were shut and, they're similar curtains to the ones you've got in there, and you just get an impression of just like green and yellow, but they were closed, they weren't sort of blowing about, because I'm sure I'd have noticed if there was sort of movement like that. But the room seemed light, and we spent a lot of time talking about this, whether it could be light coming in from the street outside, but there was a light behind us in the room and for some reason I thought, I got the impression of light coming through the doorway from behind me, which is why I said that I thought perhaps the moon was out, erm, but there as no sort of, you know, it's a question of whether, there was no sort of slats of light coming through the back that particularly caught my eye. So I didn't specifically see the shutters and I couldn't say that they were definitely open, but certainly the curtains were shut and everything was quiet".

 

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: So if the abduction occurred at 9.15pm lets look at the movements.
« Reply #6 on: July 23, 2013, 06:58:36 PM »
1st statement.
Correct wording



That it seemed to him that the shutters of the parents' bedroom window were open without knowing if the window was also open.

What was he doing in the parents bedroom? Looking to see if Madeleine slept there according to his wife, as he wonderes where she slept! So why did he look in THERE and not the kids bedroom?

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: So if the abduction occurred at 9.15pm lets look at the movements.
« Reply #7 on: July 23, 2013, 07:53:02 PM »
1st statement.
Correct wording



That it seemed to him that the shutters of the parents' bedroom window were open without knowing if the window was also open.
Actually I didn't remember I was the one who corrected this translation. But now, reading it again, I see it doesn't make sense.
The original doesn't say "parents' bedroom", but bedroom "for a couple". Both bedrooms had two beds, none had a couple or double bed, so no room was predestined to be a couple bedroom.
Why would Matthew, who doesn't make two or three steps to check whether Madeleine is really sleeping or just faking it, would open the McCanns' door to snoop the state of their shutters ?

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: So if the abduction occurred at 9.15pm lets look at the movements.
« Reply #8 on: July 23, 2013, 08:54:12 PM »
If Jane Tanner is correct and she actually had a visual with the abductor at 9.15pm and while Gerry McCann was still stood on the street just below the patio gate then the window of opportunity was really tight.
-----
Operative word being IF, there is nothing to prove she saw Madeleine, and if these pros were watching and staking out they would not have taken so many risks, thats the point of watching and staking, you go in when its least likely you will be caught, seems for some  they went in at the most dangerous time!

« Last Edit: July 23, 2013, 09:13:28 PM by Redblossom »

Offline DCI

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2585
  • Total likes: 6
  • Why are some folks so sick in the head!!!
Re: So if the abduction occurred at 9.15pm lets look at the movements.
« Reply #9 on: July 23, 2013, 09:21:08 PM »
Actually I didn't remember I was the one who corrected this translation. But now, reading it again, I see it doesn't make sense.
The original doesn't say "parents' bedroom", but bedroom "for a couple". Both bedrooms had two beds, none had a couple or double bed, so no room was predestined to be a couple bedroom.
Why would Matthew, who doesn't make two or three steps to check whether Madeleine is really sleeping or just faking it, would open the McCanns' door to snoop the state of their shutters ?

The original says

Cerca das 21H25, o depoente dirigiu-se ao interior do seu apartamento e do apartamento da
MADELEINE para verificar novamente as crianças. Esclarece que, a porta do quarto ocupado pela
MADELEINE e seus irmãos estava aberta e havia alguma claridade no quarto, na medida em que
conseguiu ver que os gémeos ocupavam os seus berços. Que de onde estava não via a cama
ocupada pela MADELEINE, mas que como estava silêncio, deduziu que esta estivesse lá a dormir.
Que essa claridade não era de luz artificial do interior do apartamento, mas talvez alguma
proveniente do exterior através da janela do quarto. Que, nessa altura pareceu-lhe que a persiana da
janela do quarto de casal estava aberta, desconhecendo se a janela estava aberta. ......................
O apartamento é composto por dois quartos, uma sala, uma kitchnet e um WC. O quarto do casal.(The double bedroom)
tem uma janela, a qual é visível do Restaurante. As janelas do quarto das crianças dão ambas
acesso ao corredor exterior do complexo turístico, ..........................................................
Seguidamente voltou para o Restaurante. .....................................................................

Google translation

At about 21:25, the witness went to the interior of your apartment and the apartment MADELEINE to recheck children. Clarifies that the door of the room occupied by Madeleine and her siblings was open and there was some light in the room, in that could see that the twins occupied their berths. That was where he saw the bed
occupied by MADELEINE, but as silence was deduced that this was there to sleep.
Clarity that this was not artificial light inside the apartment, but perhaps some from the outside through the bedroom window. That at that time it seemed that the blind of double bedroom window was open, not knowing if the window was open. ......................

The apartment consists of two bedrooms, a living room, a kitchenette and a bathroom. The double bedroom
has a window, which is visible from the restaurant. The bedroom windows of children give both access to the hallway outside of the resort.

Then returned to the restaurant. .................................................. ...................
Kate's 500 Mile Cycle Challenge

https://www.justgiving.com/KateMcCann/

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: So if the abduction occurred at 9.15pm lets look at the movements.
« Reply #10 on: July 23, 2013, 09:29:02 PM »
google translate? dci you trust a machine over people? LOL,  get the dvd files translated by google then, then you can stop complaining its wrongly translated? ok heard enough for one night, bye
« Last Edit: July 23, 2013, 09:32:54 PM by Redblossom »

Offline DCI

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2585
  • Total likes: 6
  • Why are some folks so sick in the head!!!
Re: So if the abduction occurred at 9.15pm lets look at the movements.
« Reply #11 on: July 23, 2013, 09:39:28 PM »
google translate? dci you trust a machine over people? LOL,  get the dvd files translated by google then, then you can stop complaining its wrongly translated? ok heard enough for one night, bye

No need LOL.

Whoever translates it, O quarto do casal means The double bedroom.
I think Google would have translated ALL the files better than, the "translators" have done 8-)(--)
Kate's 500 Mile Cycle Challenge

https://www.justgiving.com/KateMcCann/

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: So if the abduction occurred at 9.15pm lets look at the movements.
« Reply #12 on: July 23, 2013, 09:47:59 PM »
Some google translator's users aren't even capable to copy correctly the original text ! The quarto do casal isn't the same as the quarto de casal ! And there was no double bed in the 5A. Mr Oldfield didn't know that, because he never went in.

Offline DCI

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2585
  • Total likes: 6
  • Why are some folks so sick in the head!!!
Re: So if the abduction occurred at 9.15pm lets look at the movements.
« Reply #13 on: July 23, 2013, 10:01:24 PM »
Some google translator's users aren't even capable to copy correctly the original text ! The quarto do casal isn't the same as the quarto de casal ! And there was no double bed in the 5A. Mr Oldfield didn't know that, because he never went in.

quarto de casal = double room

quarto do casal = The double bedroom.

What is the difference?
Matt Oldfield would know if the children were in one room, then the parents would be in the other, and would class it as a double room!
Kate's 500 Mile Cycle Challenge

https://www.justgiving.com/KateMcCann/

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: So if the abduction occurred at 9.15pm lets look at the movements.
« Reply #14 on: July 23, 2013, 11:41:23 PM »
quarto de casal = double room

quarto do casal = The double bedroom.

What is the difference?
Matt Oldfield would know if the children were in one room, then the parents would be in the other, and would class it as a double room!
The difference is huge and your translations erroneous. One is a type of bedroom (and in the case of the 5A qualifies both bedrooms), the other is the referent's bedroom.