Author Topic: Abduction versus Accident  (Read 42944 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Abduction versus Accident
« Reply #135 on: July 28, 2013, 07:34:10 PM »
I am serious. And if you stopped for a minute with your insults you would also see it does make sense.

No it does not make sense LOL and quit the accusation of insults just because u dont like me answering you back LOL

now, lets hear your theory of von aeschbeing the abductor  and the evidence for it or even hewlett if u have the time

Offline Mo Stache

Re: Abduction versus Accident
« Reply #136 on: July 28, 2013, 07:37:00 PM »
I've been wondering whether they'll exit pointing to the only possibly good perpetrator i.e the one who's dead.
You clearly have misunderstood the point of the posts. The possible reason why the abductor hasn't struck again could be because he is dead. It's a fact, not an excuse or "pointing to the only possible good perpetrator". Your attempt to use a deliberately misinterpreted post to show some sort of wrong doing on the McCann's part, has failed.     

Offline Mo Stache

Re: Abduction versus Accident
« Reply #137 on: July 28, 2013, 07:38:06 PM »
No it does not make sense LOL and quit the accusation of insults just because u dont like me answering you back LOL

now, lets hear your theory of von aeschbeing the abductor  and the evidence for it or even hewlett if u have the time
They both had motive, means and opportunity.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Abduction versus Accident
« Reply #138 on: July 28, 2013, 07:51:58 PM »
They both had motive, means and opportunity.

do extrapolate

And did either if them have longblack hair? Or looked around 35 yrs old



 If u want a patsy you will have to try much much harder
« Last Edit: July 28, 2013, 07:54:22 PM by Redblossom »

Offline Mo Stache

Re: Abduction versus Accident
« Reply #139 on: July 28, 2013, 08:02:33 PM »
do extrapolate

And did either if them have longblack hair? Or looked around 35 yrs old



 If u want a patsy you will have to try much much harder
Hewletts wife looks a lot like one of those photo's released. 

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Abduction versus Accident
« Reply #140 on: July 28, 2013, 08:03:41 PM »
Hewletts wife looks a lot like one of those photo's released. The one carrying a child.

Jesus wept

Ok

Pls show it



Offline Mo Stache

Re: Abduction versus Accident
« Reply #141 on: July 28, 2013, 08:07:07 PM »



Offline Mo Stache

Re: Abduction versus Accident
« Reply #142 on: July 28, 2013, 08:08:30 PM »

Offline Carana

Re: Abduction versus Accident
« Reply #143 on: July 28, 2013, 08:23:19 PM »
No one INSISTS she is dead, why exaggerate? And the CREEP has not struck again since 2007 has he? Any 3 yr olds been snatched since  then by a stranger creep?

I never said that YOU had insisted. Some people do, however.

Here's one, just as an example, from recent posts here:

Madeleine is dead Heriberto and the sooner you realise this the better. There is no possible way a child with her physical characteristics could elude detection for six years.  Let's not kid ourselves.


But Insider is, no doubt, about to tell us exactly what did happen:

Before I go on to reveal what really happened to Madeleine ask yourself was their reactions really normal?  Was their reactions as evidenced by the two Portuguese GNR officers for example conducive with a sudden death or an abduction?



I don't know, do you?

A creep could be living a dual life close by to PdL, or could have gone elsewhere in the country, or could be in a different country.

Have there been no stranger abductions / abuse / rapes anywhere in the world since 2007?

There are around 150 missing kids on the Interpol site:

http://www.interpol.int/Missing-Persons/%28offset%29/144?missing_search=&current_age_mini=0&current_age_maxi=19

Many others may not have even been reported to Interpol.

There can be local/national alerts in languages we don't understand. I, for one, hadn't heard of many of the missing kids prior to their rescue.

 


Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Abduction versus Accident
« Reply #144 on: July 28, 2013, 09:10:53 PM »
It seems you are wrong again, Red.

How can both articles be the same date and time Published: 9:00PM GMT 06 Mar 2010 but be changed. It would usually say, updated.

So Reis used it from  http://themaddiecasefiles.com/post97436.html#p97436, on the Sunday, 7 March 2010, who seemed to added something not in the article.

http://gazetadigitalmadeleinecase.blogspot.co.uk/2010/03/i-hope-mr-robert-mendick-will-die-soon.html

Link from Reis

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/7384911/Home-Office-launches-secret-review-into-Madeleine-McCanns-disappearance.html

Bit of a difference in article title, and what Reis uses.

nothing to do with reiss

Guardian printed the prick mendicks comments and then deleted them

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Abduction versus Accident
« Reply #145 on: July 28, 2013, 09:31:18 PM »

and this is supposed to mean?? That is a pic of hewlett a decade and more ago, someone obviously skewed the sketch to make creepy gail cooper a witness to him dear god ye gods LOL
 @)(++(*


you do realise hewlett was 60 plus at the time with a few streaks  of grey hair and not a 30 yr old with a long black glossy BOB! As in Tanners sketch!

Suppose he could have worn hair extensions though LOL


A patsy should NEVER be any form of justice
« Last Edit: July 28, 2013, 09:37:19 PM by Redblossom »

Offline DCI

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2585
  • Total likes: 6
  • Why are some folks so sick in the head!!!
Re: Abduction versus Accident
« Reply #146 on: July 28, 2013, 09:36:27 PM »
nothing to do with reiss

Guardian printed the prick mendicks comments and then deleted them

So why post the Reis link? Which links to the Telegraph.  @)(++(* @)(++(*

So lets see the Guardian article. You did say it was documented, but not shown it! 8-)(--)
Kate's 500 Mile Cycle Challenge

https://www.justgiving.com/KateMcCann/

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Abduction versus Accident
« Reply #147 on: July 28, 2013, 09:38:58 PM »
So why post the Reis link? Which links to the Telegraph.  @)(++(* @)(++(*

So lets see the Guardian article. You did say it was documented, but not shown it! 8-)(--)

go to specsaver i posted it hours ago

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Abduction versus Accident
« Reply #148 on: July 28, 2013, 09:49:25 PM »

Suppose he could have worn hair extensions though LOL
@)(++(*

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Abduction versus Accident
« Reply #149 on: July 28, 2013, 09:59:52 PM »
@)(++(*

Hewlett loooked  like davos from dr who without the mask LOL

he had form and convictions for sexual assaults on teenagers in the 1970s

His MO was not abducting 3 yr olds but some people think anyone goes re Madeleine Mccann including men who preyed  on boys only