you say the 2008 exoneration has proved insufficient..insufficient to whom... a tiny group of loonies on the internet. These same loonies have already made it clear that exoneration by SY will be deemed a whitewash so I don't think your argument holds water.
Quite. Some deluded people believe the McCanns care about the trolls. They do care about people who can damage the search for their daughter by their outright lies and libel as with Bennett and Amaral but they don't give a fig for nutters and trolls. If I recall, they laugh at the saddos and confine their outpourings to a carboard box labelled "nutters" or something similar. And if you were reading the papers today you would see that Clarence Mitchell, who contrary to all those silly anti rumours, remains firmly a spokesperson for the McCanns, dismissed them as totally insignificant. Now what was that phrase he used?
And, hypothetically of course, how would these people know that they would get an exoneration if there were no conspiracy of police involvement in a cover-up?
And all that reminds me of all those nasty rumours that [ censored word] have been coming out with in the last few years. Mitchell has deserted them. Quite the opposite. The McCann couple are divorcing. Quite the opposite. Just how many more such nasty and completely wrong rumours are there going to be from these Anti McCanns I wonder?
Why would anyone not only put their potential criminality in the limelight but also draw such horrendous lies down upon themselves if they were trying to hide a crime.
No, there is no possible logical reason. None.
