Author Topic: Letter to Mike Teskowski dated 4th July 2010  (Read 9728 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Admin

Letter to Mike Teskowski dated 4th July 2010
« on: March 17, 2012, 10:04:32 PM »
Letter to Mike Teskowski dated 4th July 2010
« Last Edit: November 04, 2012, 10:41:17 PM by John »

Mr Brown

  • Guest
Re: Letter dated 4th July 2010
« Reply #1 on: March 17, 2012, 10:12:12 PM »
When someone writes totally in capital letters it's because they don't want who they truly are to be seen. They may well be totally unaware that that is why they are doing it, but that doesn't change the fact that it is!

Mr Brown

  • Guest
Re: Letter dated 4th July 2010
« Reply #2 on: March 17, 2012, 10:14:01 PM »
The least possible is revealed from writing in all capitals. Printing shows less than script, but when all the writing is in capitals, it hides even more.

Most handwritten ransom notes, for example, are written in all capitals!

You can get something from it however. For example, the slant will still tell you the emotional make up of the writer (the farther to the right, the more the emotional expression), and the heaviness of the writing will still tell you how deeply emotions affect this writer.

There are a few other indications that will still show through in all capital writing, however, the main thing to think about is that this person, knowingly or unknowlingly, is hiding themselves away. The question is "why?"

Firstimearound

  • Guest
Re: Letter dated 4th July 2010
« Reply #3 on: March 17, 2012, 10:22:37 PM »
Well, he is in prison. 

Emotions run high and are best kept contained if anyone is to survive such incarceration.

Maybe not so much hiding - but protecting oneself.

If he is innocent, hasn't he been hurt enough....?

We all have a defense mechanism that automatically sets itself in place after trauma, could this not be just that?


Mr Brown

  • Guest
Re: Letter dated 4th July 2010
« Reply #4 on: March 17, 2012, 10:45:32 PM »
Right slant indicates a response to communication, but not how it takes place. For example, the writer may wish to be friendly, manipulative, responsive, intrusive, to sell, to control, to be loving, supportive, just to name some possibilities.

If the handwriting is generally upright, this indicates independence.

A left slant tendency shows emotion and reserve. This writer needs to be true to self first and foremost and can be resentful if others try to push for more commitment from them.

Mr Brown

  • Guest
Re: Letter dated 4th July 2010
« Reply #5 on: March 17, 2012, 11:07:19 PM »
Well, he is in prison. 

Emotions run high and are best kept contained if anyone is to survive such incarceration.

he has a right slant not left one

Quote
Maybe not so much hiding - but protecting oneself.

again right slant

Quote
If he is innocent, hasn't he been hurt enough....?

Quote
We all have a defense mechanism that automatically sets itself in place after trauma, could this not be just that?

wouldnt openess reflect innocence
« Last Edit: March 17, 2012, 11:36:04 PM by Admin »

Offline puglove

Re: Letter dated 4th July 2010
« Reply #6 on: March 17, 2012, 11:30:06 PM »
Hallo, Mr Brown. I'm finding your posts really interesting - I've mentioned it on here before, I went to a talk about handwriting once and it was fascinating. I took along a letter I had from a relative who is in prison for a very serious crime, and got a VERY interesting analysis!! I hope you post somemore. x.
No prints on the gun. No expirated blood. No from the CCRC. No barbecue at Trood's.

Firstimearound

  • Guest
Re: Letter dated 4th July 2010
« Reply #7 on: March 17, 2012, 11:32:51 PM »
You present yourself as someone who seems to know what they are talking about.....and most certainly seem to be of the opinion Bamber is guilty.


Oh, I just found what you seem to have written online....almost word for word.

Why did you not just say you copied it Mr Brown.

Why are you hiding more to the point.

Firstimearound

  • Guest
Re: Letter dated 4th July 2010
« Reply #8 on: March 17, 2012, 11:34:02 PM »

Offline puglove

Re: Letter dated 4th July 2010
« Reply #9 on: March 17, 2012, 11:43:16 PM »
No prints on the gun. No expirated blood. No from the CCRC. No barbecue at Trood's.

Firstimearound

  • Guest
Re: Letter dated 4th July 2010
« Reply #10 on: March 17, 2012, 11:44:48 PM »
Oh Shona......you were taken in!

 8(8-))



Weety

  • Guest
Re: Letter dated 4th July 2010
« Reply #11 on: March 17, 2012, 11:45:21 PM »
Good spot FTA - and for the record I think hand writing analysis is quackery.

Offline puglove

Re: Letter dated 4th July 2010
« Reply #12 on: March 17, 2012, 11:46:56 PM »
Oh Shona......you were taken in!

 8(8-))

Hmm. More than you'd know!!
No prints on the gun. No expirated blood. No from the CCRC. No barbecue at Trood's.

Mr Brown

  • Guest
Re: Letter dated 4th July 2010
« Reply #13 on: March 17, 2012, 11:50:23 PM »
This is where you got your info from Mr Brown isn't it?

http://handwritinganalysis-1.blogspot.co.uk/2009/03/when-people-write-in-all-capitals.html

that is correct. and most interesting it is. i wonder how bamber writes to others or whether his writing is the same across the board. rather disturbing wouldnt you agree

Offline julie

Re: Letter dated 4th July 2010
« Reply #14 on: March 17, 2012, 11:51:46 PM »
This is where you got your info from Mr Brown isn't it?

http://handwritinganalysis-1.blogspot.co.uk/2009/03/when-people-write-in-all-capitals.html

that is correct. and most interesting it is. i wonder how bamber writes to others or whether his writing is the same across the board. rather disturbing wouldnt you agree

he comes across as quite poor in the use of the english language but maybe that is down to his environment for 26 years.