Sherlock. The psychological aspects of bundleman.

[AnneGuedes]

If you infer from a couple of legs that you're seeing Madeleine McCann, I pity your daily life.

[sadie]

If you infer from a couple of legs that you're seeing Madeleine McCann, I pity your daily life.

Have you read Jane Tanners statements?

Cos if you had, you wouldn't say that.

[stephen25000]

Have you read Jane Tanners statements?

Cos if you had, you wouldn't say that.

Well people have read her statement and  don't believe her, whether you like it or not.

[sadie]

Well people have read her statement and  don't believe her, whether you like it or not.

Have YOU read Jane Tanners Statements?

Cos if you have, I think you will take back what you said

[stephen25000]

Have YOU read Jane Tanners Statements?

Cos if you have, I think you will take back what you said

Nope.

[sadie]

I've read it some time ago.

Your put on indignation is becoming a trite repetitive.

Meanwhile have you contacted SY with your theories ???

Stephen you obviously HAVE NOT read anything I write.

[AnneGuedes]

I don't think Stephen is the only one.

[sadie]

I don't think Stephen is the only one.

I couldn't agree more, Anne

And what is more many haven't bothered to read the statements that they are talking about

[AnneGuedes]

Concision could be the magic word.

[sadie]

Concision could be the magic word.

I accept that criticism Anne.  At times I am too wordy .. a failing of mine

[sadie]

I accept that criticism Anne.  At times I am too wordy .. a failing of mine

However when dealing with such people as Faith.  A person who claims that there is no need for bundleman to go to the Staff quarters ... cos off the top of her head, she knows of 3 abandoned buildings closer, I have to be wordy.

If I later shorten the request to;  Please show me the 3 abandoned buildings.   Then most probably I will get buildings thrown at me that are further way, or buildings without proper addresses so that I cannot check them. 
Therefore each time I ask I have to specify the whole lot... exactly.

Tiresome for you .... and even more tiresome for me, who as a one fingered very slow typist has to write it.



I just wish people would be honest. 

Mistakes I can take, downright lies and disinformation .... "Off with their heads"

[stephen25000]

However when dealing with such people as Faith.  A person who claims that there is no need for bundleman to go to the Staff quarters ... cos off the top of her head, she knows of 3 abandoned buildings closer, I have to be wordy.

If I later shorten the request to;  Please show me the 3 abandoned buildings.   Then most probably I will get buildings thrown at me that are further way, or buildings without proper addresses so that I cannot check them. 
Therefore each time I ask I have to specify the whole lot... exactly.

Tiresome for you .... and even more tiresome for me, who as a one fingered very slow typist has to write it.



I just wish people would be honest. 

Mistakes I can take, downright lies and disinformation .... "Off with their heads"

So where is your answer to my question, which you have obviously avoided ?

Have you contacted SY with your 'theories' ?

[sadie]

So where is your answer to my question, which you have obviously avoided ?

Have you contacted SY with your 'theories' ?

I have told the whole forum the answer to that at least twice Stephen

Try reading.

If it that important to you, look back.

[sadie]

And, by the way Stephen

Your put on indignation is becoming a trite repetitive.

[stephen25000]

I have told the whole forum the answer to that at least twice Stephen

Try reading.

If it that important to you, look back.

A simple yes or no will suffice.