Can Anyone See a Problem With These Statements ?

[Angelo222]

Let's see.  Gerry claimed in his interview that the children were only babysat once while they had a night out yet the babysitter claims it was roughly every two months.  Does it matter??

[faithlilly]

Do you have a link to that statement, Faith. having a match to Madeleine's DNA?

From Gerry's arguido statement :

-- When confronted with the fact that Madeleine's DNA was collected from behind the sofa and in the boot of the vehicle and analyzed by a British laboratory, situations also described before, he says that he cannot explain.

[sadie]

Question for Sadie.   If it was as you described then why was there a suggestion by the PJ that Kate couldn't cope thus why there was talk of having some of the children cared for by another family member?  Was it Kate herself who mentioned this whilst being interviewed informally?

i have no idea at this "suggestion" by the PJ, but I dont trust the senior guys at Portimao (nor Faro) PJ as far as I could throw them.

Anything that they could twist to fit the Mccanns up seemed to be the order of the day.

My kids stayed overnight with grandparents.  They lived quite  close so it was usually just one night.  It was a real treat and a rest for me.

Cant see what all the problem is, tbh


Angelo, I openly admit that at times I barely coped (my kids didn't sleep) , but I wouldn't have missed those growing up years for the world.

As you know I lost my son to a brain tumour, but I have a beautifully balanced happy daughter, with friends galore.  So I must have done quite a bit right, dontcha think?

[sadie]

Had you bothered to read my post it asked two questions.  It did not contain hearsay.

You obviously missed the point.   Someone must have given Mr Amaral the thought that Kate couldn't cope.  He didn't just pluck it out of thin air.

How do you know?

He plucked it out of thin air at the arguido meeting, when he lied to Gerry that Madeleines DNA was found in the Car

[faithlilly]

i have no idea at this "suggestion" by the PJ, but I dont trust the senior guys at Portimao (nor Faro) PJ as far as I could throw them.

Anything that they could twist to fit the Mccanns up seemed to be the order of the day.

My kids stayed overnight with grandparents.  They lived quite  close so it was usually just one night.  It was real treat and a rest for me.

Cant see what all the problem is, tgh


Angelo, I openly admit that at times I barely coped (my kids didn't sleep) , but I wouldn't have missed those growing up years for the world.

As you know I lost my son to a brain tumour, but I have a beautifully balanced happy daughter, with friends galore.  So I must have done quite a bit right, dontcha think?

Would you have sent them to their grandparents for Christmas ? And would you have missed seeing them opening their presents at Christmas ? Miss the delight in their eyes ?

[DCI]

From Gerry's arguido statement :

-- When confronted with the fact that Madeleine's DNA was collected from behind the sofa and in the boot of the vehicle and analyzed by a British laboratory, situations also described before, he says that he cannot explain.

But thats not what you said, you said a match.

Of course I didn't mean Madeleine travelled to Glasgow alone, that is simply absurd.

As to your interpretation, it simply des not fit with the wording of the article.

'A dishonest person who wrote Gerry's statement.' How ? The original is there for all to see, signed by Gerry. So who, in your opinion was dishonest, not Amaral because he wasn't there at the questioning so who ? The translator ? And why manipulate an innocuous, at the time, answer of Gerry's but leave the part in which they tell Gerry they have a match to Madelein's DNA, in ?

Big difference there, don't you think?

[faithlilly]

But thats not what you said, you said a match.

Big difference there, don't you think?

Nope.

[Albertini]

i have no idea at this "suggestion" by the PJ, but I dont trust the senior guys at Portimao (nor Faro) PJ as far as I could throw them.

Anything that they could twist to fit the Mccanns up seemed to be the order of the day.

And how would they have got that through a court on the most publicised trial in the world?

The PJ would have been ridiculed from pillar to post throughout the world if a "fit up" was brought to a court.

[faithlilly]

And how would they have got that through a court on the most publicised trial in the world?

The PJ would have been ridiculed from pillar to post throughout the world if a "fit up" was brought to a court.

At last some logic applied. Thank you Alertini.

[sadie]

And how would they have got that through a court on the most publicised trial in the world?

The PJ would have been ridiculed from pillar to post throughout the world if a "fit up" was brought to a court.

Easy

They get the right judge, who disallows any documents, or witnesses, that would prove the defendants innocent.  Doesn't allow them to be even shown to the Court.



Now, let me see, has that happened before? >@@(*&)

[stephen25000]

Easy

They get the right judge, who disallows any documents, or witnesses, that would prove the defendants innocent.  Doesn't allow them to be even shown to the Court.



Now, let me see, has that happened before? >@@(*&)

The 'fit  up' is just one of the myths, amongst others, perpetuated by the Mccanns ,their associates, and their devoted followers.

[sadie]

The 'fit  up' is just one of the myths, amongst others, perpetuated by the Mccanns ,their associates, and their devoted followers.

We have all witnessed the fit ups. 

But you have open your eyes to see what has happened.

And be honest ...

[Albertini]

Easy

They get the right judge, who disallows any documents, or witnesses, that would prove the defendants innocent.  Doesn't allow them to be even shown to the Court.



Now, let me see, has that happened before? >@@(*&)

And you think it's the "anti's" ahow are consipiracy theory loons! Jeez!

[sadie]

And you think it's the "anti's" ahow are consipiracy theory loons! Jeez!

Now, let me see, has that happened before?   >@@(*&)

They get the right judge, who disallows any documents, or witnesses, that would prove the defendants innocent.  Doesn't allow them to be even shown to the Court.

Now has that happened before?

Andy ....Sir .... do you have any knowledge ? .... or Eleanor .... you are good at this .... anyone?

Thought I had seen mention somewhere ?