The McCann v Gonçalo Amaral Libel Trial trial now set for September 2013

[Chinagirl]

'Amaral's behaviour in this matter has been immoral and inhumane. '

Utter biased rubbish.

You are an out and out Mccann supporter.

The two words 'immoral and inhumane' can be applied equally to the parents in their treatment of their children in leaving them alone and unprotected.

Of course I support the McCanns. 

I support their right to the presumption of innocence; their right to their good name; their right not to be considered guilty of a crime(s) for which they have never been charged; their right to search for their missing child in their own way; their right to have the police forces and other judicial authorities of their country investigate what has happened to their missing child; their right to sue those who would deny them their rights; and finally, their right to live free of denigration by non-entities posting on the internet.

[stephen25000]

Of course I support the McCanns. 

I support their right to the presumption of innocence; their right to their good name; their right not to be considered guilty of a crime(s) for which they have never been charged; their right to search for their missing child in their own way; their right to have the police forces and other judicial authorities of their country investigate what has happened to their missing child; their right to sue those who would deny them their rights; and finally, their right to live free of denigration by non-entities posting on the internet.

LET'S GET A FEW FACTS RIGHT.

They left their children deliberately for several successive evenings unattended for large periods and they say in an unlocked residence.

The consequence of which was the disappearance of Madeleine, read the FCO on that.

The police investigated and found no evidence whatsoever of abduction.

The parents and associates accounts of what happened were not consistent.

The PJ on direction from the UK police investigated the parents.
The forensics were inconclusive, therefore it doesn't discount something happened to Madeleine in the apartment.

As to 'non-entities' on the internet, well I've seen a few on here............................

The keyboard searchers.

[Luz]

Of course I support the McCanns. 

I support their right to the presumption of innocence; their right to their good name; their right not to be considered guilty of a crime(s) for which they have never been charged; their right to search for their missing child in their own way; their right to have the police forces and other judicial authorities of their country investigate what has happened to their missing child; their right to sue those who would deny them their rights; and finally, their right to live free of denigration by non-entities posting on the internet.

You were doing so well, but...

Fair enough. So ask them to open to scrutiny. Why have they refused a reconstitution of the night their daughter disappeared? Why did they refuse a polygraph test offered by an expert that read Mrs. McCann's stating to a newspaper that she would do it?
Why didn't they ask for the investigation process to be kept open in Portugal when they could do it just by saying so and, now with the status of assistent?????

Look, they have rights that must be respected by all of us. But Madeleine has rights too, and I'm sorry if to respect hers theirs must be questioned .

[AnneGuedes]

Why didn't they ask for the investigation process to be kept open in Portugal when they could do it just by saying so and, now with the status of assistent?????

I don't think they would have been granted that status had they required an instruction (the arguido one gives more or less the same rights).

[Redblossom]

Nice summary of facts and events analysis and opinion on the libel writ and trial



http://aninspectorcallsyou.blogspot.co.uk/