Yes, Jane herself.
As per the "i thought it was" comment.
So we have TWO incidents described in the Rogatory interview:
"so I didn’t really, but I didn’t even recognise it as the person I’d been talking to five minutes before, well, you know, half an hour before, so. Erm, and then, erm, then went, I think because it has gone a bit wrong because this car had been there and then tried to set it up elsewhere, but again I couldn’t really see, I couldn’t really see that well and, you know, it didn’t look, it didn’t jog, jog any memories”.
4078 “Now you are left with that mental image in your head about the man carrying the child”.Reply “Umm”.
4078 “And you said, you described his hair quite well. Having seen MURAT then and obviously in the papers since, could you link the two of those?”
Reply
“I don’t think so. I mean, I don’t, phew, I don’t, I don’t think it, no, there doesn’t, there’s no, but then the person I see in the paper doesn’t really look like my recollection of the person I met on the way to meet Bob SMALL. It’s really annoying because normally I would have probably taken more notice but I was so worried about what I was going to do, because I didn’t know at this point at all, I didn’t really take any notice, but I think it was too short and I remember it being, being long into the neck and not so. Again, I don’t really, when I saw Robert MURAT outside his house he looked quite little to me, but then when you see him on the telly he seems quite bit, so I can’t, again, I don’t think the build, the build was right, I don’t”.
4078 “So you don’t feel, in your heart of hearts”.
Reply
“No”. 4078 “You don’t feel it was the same person?”
Reply
“No, I don’t, no”."____________
Then there is this - later in the interview where they are discussing whether Russel and Rachel had seen Murat around the complex on the night in question. It was here that Tanner said she wasnt sure whether she had seen him or not - e.g 4078
“No”.
Reply “But I just thought it was”. 4078 “Because there had been some dispute as to whether they’ve actually seen him when they’ve said they’ve seen him”.
________________________________
Putting that comment in the context of the actual interview (something that you seem strangely reluctent to do).
4078 “Yes, yes go on”.
Reply “Erm well I think it’s when I’d done the, well I did the surveillance and then the next day after that, I think it came on Sky News about whether they were searching, what the MURAT’s house, so that’s Rachel sort of came running down at that point and sort of said, have you seen this blah, blah and at this point, nobody knew that I’d done the surveillance cos the Portuguese Police were very adamant that I shouldn’t tell anybody and I didn’t tell anybody for days actually, I didn’t even tell them then that it was actually, that I’d done it, I mean it was a couple of days afterwards.
So Rachel came down and sort of said, oh I saw him blah, blah, blah and then I think Russell, I can’t remember who else
but then somebody else said oh they, they saw him and etc., so at that point it was, I rang Bob SMALL cos I’d got, I’d got his number from the day before for them and you know, they sort of, you know to say, oh is this, is this relevant and also I wanted to tell him that I’d seen him on the way to the doing the surveillance as well yeah just for that, so I think it’s just to make the point really that I think at that point,
they didn’t know that Robert MURAT said he wasn’t there on the night”.
4078 “Right”.
Reply “You know, or said yeah, had said that he wasn’t there on the night, so you know was immediately, I think it was immediately, I’m not trying to push anything onto Robert MURAT’s door, cos as I say I don’t think it was him that I saw”.
4078
“No”.
Reply “But I just thought it was”. 4078 “Because there had been some dispute as to whether they’ve actually seen him when they’ve said they’ve seen him”.
____________
In summary - these are two entirely different things. 4078
“No”.
Reply “But I just thought it was”. clearly does not realte to the man Tanner saw carrying a child.
