Author Topic: New DNA tests ordered by the SCCRC  (Read 29149 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline faithlilly

Re: New DNA tests ordered by the SCCRC
« Reply #60 on: December 19, 2022, 10:44:58 PM »
I wasn't even going to mention the infamous missing parka again -- it does get extremely tedious and tiresome going over and over the same things -- but I found out something new recently that is very relevant to it; refreshingly, it was something I hadn't heard before, from a nice young lady from the Whitburn area in Scotland, UK, whose cousin was called as a Crown witness in this trial to give evidence around this parka jacket specifically. It gets a lot better: her cousin had a photo of Luke Mitchell wearing this parka jacket in May 2003, along with Jodi Jones and another couple of friends. Her cousin was one of Jodi's best friends, allegedly. The police took this photo as evidence and still have it in the present day. Interestingly, this same girl was able to tell me that the police also took a photo from Kimberley Thompson that featured Luke wearing the green parka in March 2003 and used it as evidence at court. (Oh, also, this same lass told me that the police took the CCTV tapes from St David's High School in Dalkeith, no doubt to corroborate the school teacher's testimony of also seeing Luke wearing that parka in the school playground, looking like, in the teacher's own words, "a hooded monk". So, Chris, there you have it:  two separate pieces of direct evidence of Luke Mitchell wearing that parka before the murder. So, where did it go to? And why did Corinne buy Luke another parka on 08.07.03 that was identical to the old one? There are, in the public domain, newspaper articles from 2003-2005 stating that 8 separate witnesses testified in court that LM had worn a green parka prior to the murder. Very incriminating for LM, especially when linked to the other circumstantial evidence. Guilty as!

So, Chris, even from looking at the above, you get a sense of the overwhelming circumstantial evidence against LM, outwith forensics. And it is so strong that we can infer that those couple of (as yet) unidentified profiles found at or near the crime scene were there by innocent transfer.

So the police had photographs of Luke allegedly wearing the green parka before the murder yet never produced them in court?

Tell you what Mr Apples, I have a bridge that you might be interested in….special price just for you.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Nicholas

Re: New DNA tests ordered by the SCCRC
« Reply #61 on: December 19, 2022, 10:50:11 PM »
So the police had photographs of Luke allegedly wearing the green parka before the murder yet never produced them in court?

Tell you what Mr Apples, I have a bridge that you might be interested in….special price just for you.

The media were not allowed to report on certain aspects of killer Luke Mitchell’s trial, for example; due to age restrictions
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: New DNA tests ordered by the SCCRC
« Reply #62 on: December 19, 2022, 10:54:53 PM »
I wasn't even going to mention the infamous missing parka again -- it does get extremely tedious and tiresome going over and over the same things -- but I found out something new recently that is very relevant to it; refreshingly, it was something I hadn't heard before, from a nice young lady from the Whitburn area in Scotland, UK, whose cousin was called as a Crown witness in this trial to give evidence around this parka jacket specifically. It gets a lot better: her cousin had a photo of Luke Mitchell wearing this parka jacket in May 2003, along with Jodi Jones and another couple of friends. Her cousin was one of Jodi's best friends, allegedly. The police took this photo as evidence and still have it in the present day. Interestingly, this same girl was able to tell me that the police also took a photo from Kimberley Thompson that featured Luke wearing the green parka in March 2003 and used it as evidence at court. (Oh, also, this same lass told me that the police took the CCTV tapes from St David's High School in Dalkeith, no doubt to corroborate the school teacher's testimony of also seeing Luke wearing that parka in the school playground, looking like, in the teacher's own words, "a hooded monk".

Didn’t killer Luke Mitchell tell con-artist Sandra Lean about this?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: New DNA tests ordered by the SCCRC
« Reply #63 on: December 19, 2022, 11:00:44 PM »
I wasn't even going to mention the infamous missing parka again -- it does get extremely tedious and tiresome going over and over the same things -- but I found out something new recently that is very relevant to it; refreshingly, it was something I hadn't heard before, from a nice young lady from the Whitburn area in Scotland, UK, whose cousin was called as a Crown witness in this trial to give evidence around this parka jacket specifically. It gets a lot better: her cousin had a photo of Luke Mitchell wearing this parka jacket in May 2003, along with Jodi Jones and another couple of friends. Her cousin was one of Jodi's best friends, allegedly. The police took this photo as evidence and still have it in the present day. Interestingly, this same girl was able to tell me that the police also took a photo from Kimberley Thompson that featured Luke wearing the green parka in March 2003 and used it as evidence at court. (Oh, also, this same lass told me that the police took the CCTV tapes from St David's High School in Dalkeith, no doubt to corroborate the school teacher's testimony of also seeing Luke wearing that parka in the school playground, looking like, in the teacher's own words, "a hooded monk".

Didn’t Parky write about this Mr Apples

Part 27 The Never To Be Seen Again ‘Magic Coat’
👇
https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/08/27/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-27/

Part 37 The Gig & The Replacement Parka
👇
https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/09/02/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-36-2/

Part 70 Facts Concerning The Log Burner
👇
https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/10/09/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-70/
« Last Edit: December 19, 2022, 11:04:36 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Mr Apples

Re: New DNA tests ordered by the SCCRC
« Reply #64 on: December 19, 2022, 11:46:19 PM »
Didn’t killer Luke Mitchell tell con-artist Sandra Lean about this?

I think you know the answer, Nicholas.


Offline Nicholas

Re: New DNA tests ordered by the SCCRC
« Reply #65 on: December 19, 2022, 11:48:05 PM »
newspaper articles from 2003-2005 stating that 8 separate witnesses testified in court that LM had worn a green parka prior to the murder. Very incriminating for LM, especially when linked to the other circumstantial evidence. Guilty as!

Do you know how many witnesses gave evidence about seeing him up in the disposed of/burnt khaki green parka that didn’t testify in court?
« Last Edit: December 20, 2022, 02:15:27 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: New DNA tests ordered by the SCCRC
« Reply #66 on: December 19, 2022, 11:57:13 PM »
I think you know the answer, Nicholas.

I do Mr Apples

Though I strongly suspect someone’s told her since but she’s chosen to keep it hidden
« Last Edit: December 20, 2022, 12:04:44 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Mr Apples

Re: New DNA tests ordered by the SCCRC
« Reply #67 on: December 20, 2022, 12:51:53 AM »
Didn’t Parky write about this Mr Apples

Part 27 The Never To Be Seen Again ‘Magic Coat’
👇
https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/08/27/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-27/

Part 37 The Gig & The Replacement Parka
👇
https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/09/02/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-36-2/

Part 70 Facts Concerning The Log Burner
👇
https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/10/09/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-70/


No. This was a girl I spoke to on social media last week. She has a younger female cousin who was close to Jodi and who had a photograph that featured Luke, Jodi, her female cousin and a couple of other friends. Said photograph was taken in May 2003. Crucially, Luke was wearing the olive green parka in it. The police took the photo and used it as evidence in court, with the girl's cousin also there at court as a witness. This girl's cousin was at court during the same days as Kimberley Thompson; KT had a photo of LM wearing that parka in March 2003 which was presented at court as evidence. CCTV footage from St David's High School was show in court, revealing LM wearing the parka before the murder. So much incriminating circumstantial evidence.

Parky41 is correct, though: LM, without a doubt, owned a khaki green parka jacket before 30.06.03. So, why deny its existence? And why buy the exact same parka again, on 08.07.03? Could it be that the old one had traces of Jodi's blood on it? Could it be that he also knew he had been spotted in it that early evening of 30.06.03 -- but hoped the newly purchased one on 08.07.03 would help get him off because the old one was destroyed and this new one obviously had no incriminating dna on it? Was LM originally not going to deny having a parka jacket before the 30.06.03? He was only going to deny being at the easthouses end of the path? But, his plans were scuppered by the FLO who was watching their every move and purchase?

I wonder if LM was DNA-aware at the time of the murder or if Corinne or Shane told him about it that day.



« Last Edit: December 21, 2022, 09:16:25 PM by Mr Apples »

Offline Mr Apples

Re: New DNA tests ordered by the SCCRC
« Reply #68 on: December 20, 2022, 01:03:00 AM »
Do you know how many witnesses gave evidence about seeing him up in the disposed of/burnt that didn’t testify in court?

Don't know exactly, Nicholas. I suspect a lot (I heard about another 20 saw him in the original parka but weren't called to give evidence).

Interestingly, on the Shirley McKie tapatalk website, there is a thread exclusively on the LM case and it contains some interesting — sometimes obscure  — info on the case. One of the most interesting pieces of info I’ve read from that site was from a woman with the username ‘alison’, and you can tell from her posts that she’s not a troll or anyone with an agenda against either Luke or Jodi. This woman grew up near LM & JODJ and said her two children knew both LM & JODJ and said that both her children had been deeply traumatised by the case (she never mentioned if her children were called as witnesses to court; she made a point of not revealing too much of her family and personal details, which was fair enough and sensible). Anyway, this woman called alison said, categorically, that she had seen LM wearing a green parka a couple of times before the murder — one of her sightings was a couple of weeks before the murder and the other was in late May, 2003. She indicated that Jodi was with Luke in one of these sightings. She also said that if she was ever called to court and had to give the evidence of her sightings of LM with the green parka on before the murder that she would, and also claimed that CM was a liar for denying any knowledge of Luke having a parka before the murder (alison never said she had seen CM with LM when he was wearing the parka before 30.06.03, but maybe this is what she was implying by that comment?). She also said that she thought LM was guilty.  This info from alison in regards to the parka was enough to convince me that LM did definitely own one before the murder.
« Last Edit: December 20, 2022, 01:14:21 AM by Mr Apples »

Offline Mr Apples

Re: New DNA tests ordered by the SCCRC
« Reply #69 on: December 20, 2022, 01:12:22 AM »
So the police had photographs of Luke allegedly wearing the green parka before the murder yet never produced them in court?

Tell you what Mr Apples, I have a bridge that you might be interested in….special price just for you.

You've completely misconstrued. Again.

Btw, Faith, if there's any more daft reasoning from you they'll come after you with a big butterfly net!

Offline Nicholas

Re: New DNA tests ordered by the SCCRC
« Reply #70 on: December 20, 2022, 01:13:26 AM »
Don't know exactly, Nicholas. I suspect a lot (I heard about 20 saw him in the original parka but weren't called to give evidence).

I suspect a lot too.

It’s obvious the idea to get a replacement replica was done to cause confusion - wonder if Corinne Mitchell’s adoptive mother Ruby Guetta aided any of this behaviour?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: New DNA tests ordered by the SCCRC
« Reply #71 on: December 20, 2022, 01:14:09 AM »
Interestingly, on the Shirley McKie tapatalk website, there is a thread exclusively on the LM case and it contains some interesting — sometimes obscure  — info on the case. One of the most interesting pieces of info I’ve read from that site was from a woman with the username ‘alison’, and you can tell from her posts that she’s not a troll or anyone with an agenda against either Luke or Jodi. This woman grew up near LM & JODJ and said her two children knew both LM & JODJ and said that both her children had been deeply traumatised by the case (she never mentioned if her children were called as witnesses to court; she made a point of not revealing too much of her family and personal details, which was fair enough and sensible). Anyway, this woman called alison said, categorically, that she had seen LM wearing a green parka a couple of times before the murder — one of her sightings was a couple of weeks before the murder and the other was in late May, 2003. She indicated that Jodi was with Luke in one of these sightings. She also said that if she was ever called to court and had to give the evidence of her sightings of LM with the green parka on before the murder that she would, and also claimed that CM was a liar for denying any knowledge of Luke having a parka before the murder (alison never said she had seen CM with LM when he was wearing the parka before 30.06.03, but maybe this is what she was implying by that comment?). She also said that she thought LM was guilty.  This info from alison in regards to the parka was enough to convince me that LM did definitely own one before the murder.

There are several threads exclusively on killer Luke Mitchell

I do recall seeing the name Alison albeit not back in 2010

“It is commen knowledge in the area of mayfield/easthouses that jodi stayed at her grans house a lot of the time”

https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/shirleymckie/luke-mitchell-new-thread-t600-s1030.html

Liar Corinne Mitchell - 27th July 2010
👇
..there is an "innocent" explanation for Kellys semen AND blood on Jodis clothing

Be wary of who you defend.....and who you condemn......remember....we have the paperwork!


 *&^^&
« Last Edit: December 20, 2022, 01:35:12 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Mr Apples

Re: New DNA tests ordered by the SCCRC
« Reply #72 on: December 20, 2022, 01:35:29 AM »
I suspect a lot too.

It’s obvious the idea to get a replacement replica was done to cause confusion - wonder if Corinne Mitchell’s adoptive mother Ruby Guetta aided any of this behaviour?

Definitely to cause confusion. I think him changing back into the bomber jacket after the Lf & RW sighting lends credence to that theory. After all, there were loads of jackets of his hanging up on his bedroom door, but he chose another green jacket. Not a coincidence, imo. Done deliberately, very much to cause confusion

Offline Nicholas

Re: New DNA tests ordered by the SCCRC
« Reply #73 on: December 20, 2022, 01:46:26 AM »
Definitely to cause confusion. I think him changing back into the bomber jacket after the Lf & RW sighting lends credence to that theory. After all, there were loads of jackets of his hanging up on his bedroom door, but he chose another green jacket. Not a coincidence, imo. Done deliberately, very much to cause confusion

Liar Lynne Hall claimed her killer son was wearing a jumper and blue jeans and chunky boots when he went to his parents house that morning.

Many of the mothers involved in these innocence fraud scams lie for their murdering sons

Had Shane Mitchell ever been arrested prior to his brother committing murder?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: New DNA tests ordered by the SCCRC
« Reply #74 on: December 20, 2022, 02:10:54 AM »
Reg126 aka un-convicted baby killer Billy Middleton - 25th June 2010

As far as I am aware Mrs Mitchell and Shane deny any fire being in the burner that night”

 *&^^&

It was Killer Luke Mitchell who said Corinne and Shane Mitchell were having a fire in the back garden

And Corinne Mitchell told the jury she might have been burning pampas grass
https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/shirleymckie/luke-mitchell-new-thread-t600-s710.html
« Last Edit: December 20, 2022, 02:13:03 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation