Author Topic: The Times of London ...  (Read 13846 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Luz

Re: The Times of London ...
« Reply #30 on: September 16, 2013, 02:41:04 PM »
Thats a good point!
They probably couldnt not report on it at all, but if they had in full, some of the goings on and statements in court would have seemed a little mindboggling.

Only some weeks ago the Mccanns were on TV sofas saying how happy they were with SY progress and how the search was being speeded up, SY had make breakthroughs etc etc...vast contrast to the tardis like going back in time now

I would imagine the case wouod have some impact on the SY/PJ/other  relations

I think that was also the reason why Mr. Santos Oliveira requested a private session, although he didn't say so on these many words - if I recall, he said it was to respect Madeleine's case.
What I find strange, or maybe not, is why the other part wanted a session accessible to the media, if or when they were advised by SY not to attend the Court because of the danger of a media circus that could harm the investigation!

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: The Times of London ...
« Reply #31 on: September 16, 2013, 02:41:14 PM »
When Amaral's lawyer suggested to the court that the Press be ejected I believe they panicked and even approached members of the public to report for them such was their desperation for a juicy story.

But early on the first day the judge decided to reject this request, there was nothing stopping any reporter sitting in, not as if they had anythng better to do once out there
 @)(++(*




Offline Luz

Re: The Times of London ...
« Reply #32 on: September 16, 2013, 02:43:49 PM »
But early on the first day the judge decided to reject this request, there was nothing stopping any reporter sitting in, not as if they had anythng better to do once out there
 @)(++(*

Higher authorities must have spoken to these poor slaves of this trade of reporting the truth.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: The Times of London ...
« Reply #33 on: September 16, 2013, 02:44:38 PM »
I think that was also the reason why Mr. Santos Oliveira requested a private session, although he didn't say so on these many words - if I recall, he said it was to respect Madeleine's case.
What I find strange, or maybe not, is why the other part wanted a session accessible to the media, if or when they were advised by SY not to attend the Court because of the danger of a media circus that could harm the investigation!

Another good point, good spot

Eta John, this could be a reason....so many strands going on Brit press were more likely cautious, so cancelling out my previous post a bit I suppose, I dont know....its confusing...time will tell

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: The Times of London ...
« Reply #34 on: September 16, 2013, 02:47:10 PM »
Higher authorities must have spoken to these poor slaves of this trade of reporting the truth.

It was all so surreal last Friday the 13th

 @)(++(*


Offline Mo Stache

Re: The Times of London ...
« Reply #35 on: September 16, 2013, 02:50:29 PM »
Why don't you contact Martin Brunt and ask why the media did not report on day 2, instead of speculating here, allowing another forum myth to grow wings?
 @skymartinbrunt

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: The Times of London ...
« Reply #36 on: September 16, 2013, 02:51:31 PM »
Why don't you contact Martin Brunt and ask why the media did not report on day 2, instead of speculating here, allowing another forum myth to grow wings?
 @skymartinbrunt

Talking to anyone in particular? Or just gassing willy nilly


Oh and dear, speculating is not the same as myth forming or stating any speculation is a FACT,  just speculating, wondering and asking questions, not a crime last time I looked
« Last Edit: September 16, 2013, 02:53:44 PM by Redblossom »

Offline Mo Stache

Re: The Times of London ...
« Reply #37 on: September 16, 2013, 03:00:27 PM »
Talking to anyone in particular? Or just gassing willy nilly


Oh and dear, speculating is not the same as myth forming or stating any speculation is a FACT,  just speculating, wondering and asking questions, not a crime last time I looked
Suggesting to all those wondering to contact Martin and ask him.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: The Times of London ...
« Reply #38 on: September 16, 2013, 03:05:56 PM »
Suggesting to all those wondering to contact Martin and ask him.

If and when anyne needs your advice Im sure they will ask you for it, meanwhile, do stop tryng to stifle debate, ta muchly

Offline DCI

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2585
  • Total likes: 6
  • Why are some folks so sick in the head!!!
Re: The Times of London ...
« Reply #39 on: September 16, 2013, 04:00:14 PM »
Why don't you contact Martin Brunt and ask why the media did not report on day 2, instead of speculating here, allowing another forum myth to grow wings?
 @skymartinbrunt

Martin Brunt was only there on Thursday, and he had a portuguese tv jounalist working as his translator.
Kate's 500 Mile Cycle Challenge

https://www.justgiving.com/KateMcCann/

Offline Sherlock Holmes

Re: The Times of London ...
« Reply #40 on: September 16, 2013, 04:17:49 PM »
It was all so surreal last Friday the 13th

 @)(++(*

Superstitious are you, Red?

Tea leaves and all that..

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: The Times of London ...
« Reply #41 on: September 16, 2013, 04:21:23 PM »
Superstitious are you, Red?

Tea leaves and all that..

Not at all, just fitting!
 8(>((


Offline Sherlock Holmes

Re: The Times of London ...
« Reply #42 on: September 16, 2013, 04:25:21 PM »

Offline Jazzy

Re: The Times of London ...
« Reply #43 on: September 16, 2013, 04:29:14 PM »
You're right on one account, the reporter is driven by the need to embellish his or her story for cash rewards.

Cash wouldn't be the only agenda to skew a story towards a certain viewpoint though, bias would be another.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: The Times of London ...
« Reply #44 on: September 16, 2013, 05:16:40 PM »
Martin Brunt was only there on Thursday, and he had a portuguese tv jounalist working as his translator.
Martin Brunt was with a young Portuguese lady who wasn't a journalist nor a TV reporter, but working in PR (that's what she told me)