The breathtaking hypocrisy of those that support the McCanns

[jassi]

Now let's get precise here, does 'no indications of a crime' mean no crime took place ?

As you know, lack of evidence does not mean a crime didn't take place.

Madeleine's disappearance was the crime, but cause undetermined.

[stephen25000]

Well legally they are certainly Not Guilty. Therefore they are legally innocent.

Any moral guilt suggested by you says more about your moral state than theirs.

How can they be not guilty as they  haven't been charged with a crime ?

[stephen25000]

There can be no legal imputation of guilt if there is insufficient evidence to convict; therefore the McCanns are Not Guilty of any crime.They may have offended your moral compass, but it does seems a little iffy anyway.

Since the crime is undetermined, and they haven't been charged, they can't be 'not guilty' for the reason  stated in my last post.

However, it does not mean a crime has not occurred.

[jassi]

I thought everyone was assumed as not guilty until convicted.

[Redblossom]

The files are not Truth but belief and they have qualified privilege as such. Repeating them does not attract privilege and is actionable.

Oh......
 >@@(*&)

[Lyall]

I think Aiofe has a big internment camp waiting for us

[faithlilly]

I suspect that if Amaral wins the McCanns, or more specifically the fund, will have little money left in it to sue anyone.


With pro bono and possibly CFA from CR there is little cost. A few letters before action requiring the fora to hand over the membership lists. The information I stupidly posted yesterday was extracted from the SQL database of the 3A's server- the courts would hand that to CR giving IPs and email addresses. Then all that is required is to choose the twenty most prolific posters and send libe claims that are meant to sustain and sens LBA with a £50 get out to the rest. CR would make its money back from the £50 settlers- it has all been discussed.

And if those posters choose to fight or indeed have no assets ?

[Redblossom]

Which article is that?

THIS one



http://themaddiecasefiles.com/post275818.html?sid=03707a8b5e3ef71f77a7d6c15edf8775#p275818

[Aiofe]

How can they be not guilty as they  haven't been charged with a crime ?

Because we are all assumed innocent until convicted.

[Aiofe]

Since the crime is undetermined, and they haven't been charged, they can't be 'not guilty' for the reason  stated in my last post.

However, it does not mean a crime has not occurred.

This cultish thinking at its highest level.

It ignores centuries of legal tradition and is plainly wrong. I was in Los angeles the night RFK was shot, I was close to the campaign, perhaps I was an accomplice of Sirhan Bishara Sirhan. In Stephen25000's eyes I am not innocent of this crime.

What a cult (spelled that carefully).

[Aiofe]

And if those posters choose to fight or indeed have no assets ?

If they chose to fight they would run into the Bennett problem- no lawyers. CR would sue for £50 plus their costs of about £50,000. Goodbye house and pension. This is what happened to Sally Bercow- had to pay £50k plus her and CR costs. £150k gone like that.

[Redblossom]

I think Aiofe has a big internment camp waiting for us

Most of his attempts at intimidation what he posts is rollox here...CR cant just snap their fingers and get police to get court orders to reveal IP address accounts....for a bunch of internet posters..an IP account does not prove anything does it? Who would CR address these hypothetical letters to? And  all a bit rich from someone who boasted elsewhere that he had a hand in hacking the old forum 3as.......and seemed so proud too.....and the fact that he thnks it is FINE to break the law himself vis a vis data protection....and plaster dozens of peoples real names along their forum user Ids, as he did yesterday......hypocrite.....

As for Sally Bercow, she is a high profile person, wife of speaker of house of commons, has thousands of tweeters following, so her tweet related to others calling McAlpine a paedophile is hardly on the same par as a bunch of normal people researching  and discussing a cold police case .......what dramatics

[Aiofe]

THIS one



http://themaddiecasefiles.com/post275818.html?sid=03707a8b5e3ef71f77a7d6c15edf8775#p275818

Basically irrelevant

[stephen25000]

Because we are all assumed innocent until convicted.

So what exactly are the mccanns assumed innocent of ?

Do you concede a crime occurred in the apartment for which no conclusive evidence exists ?

[Aiofe]

Most of his attempts at intimidation what he posts is rollox here.....and all a bit rich from someone who boasted elsewhere that he had a hand in hacking the old forum 3as.......and seemed so proud too.....and the fact that he thnks it is FINE to break the law himself vis a vis data protection....and plaster dozens of peoples real names along their forum user Ids, hypocrite.....

I did not hack the 3As. No computer skills. It was not hacked anyway.

That aside, what I say about the Bercow case applies- why would it not?