Are Amaral's views the best for a missing child case?

[Lyall]

Lets do a little "omnipresent" test shall we?
Stats as of a few minutes ago;-
 
Faithlilly
Total Time Spent Online: 17 days, 2 hours and 36 minutes.

Anne
Total Time Spent Online: 35 days, 17 hours and 3 minutes.

Redblossom
Total Time Spent Online: 22 days, 14 hours and 50 minutes.

Compare with-

Gilet
Total Time Spent Online: 8 days, 7 hours and 41 minutes.

Mo Stache
Total Time Spent Online: 4 days, 19 hours and 4 minutes.

What about Sadie? >@@(*&)

[faithlilly]

That would be so funny were it not so genuinely sad.

Trying desperately to find words to abuse me without upsetting the mods, Anne Guedes, chose the word "omnipresent" and her partner in arms chose to applaud that.

But the truth is that Faithlilly is far more present here than I am by over 500 posts and Anne Guedes is almost 300% more present than I am here with over 3500 posts.

Really, you must try harder to be abusive because that is an truly awful attempt.

It's the timing of you visits, not the number, that is illuminating gilet.

As to being abusive, I leave that to those better versed in the art 

[gilet]

Common Law is different from Romano-Germanic Law. No reconstruction in front of cameras with actors here, but reconstitution with the protagonists in front of PJ inspectors. No wild launching appeals through the tabloids (to get hundred of sightings 100% sure because a little blond one was seen with big dark wolf), but pondered announcement to strategic institutions.

You have repeated that bit about common law now and it is still totally irrelevant and off topic.

As for the second part of your post, I am horrified.

It comes across as quite sickening. Don't you realise that? Unforutnately the English is horribly garbled and the actual meaning is not as clear as it might be but the part in brackets sounds... I actually cannot think of words to describe it.

We are talking about the parents of a missing child having to organise TV appeals because the Police don't believe in such things, I repeat a little child and desperate parents.

You are taking the Amaral statement about the worthlessness of appeals to a whole new and quite horrible level I think. Please rephrase what you have posted and assure me that you do not mean to do that.

[Redblossom]

Oh dear!! Have you just re read what you posted? You admit Gilet hasn't been around for a good while, i.e. how can he then be accused of being "omnipresent"? Stat's dont lie.

I made the point that Gilet has made dozens if not hundreds of posts in the last week, you cant take mean numbers over time  as reflecting any point in time

[Mo Stache]

What about Sadie? >@@(*&)

Sadie is not here and is not participating in the current discussion on this thread. Rather unfair to drag her into this, don't you think?

[gilet]

I almost never log out, without necessarily being there.

Ah so then lets rely on post count then.

As I said, almost 300% more than me.

3543

1267

Pot calling kettle, I believe.

Your calling me omnipresent here is a really daft way to try to abuse me and a blatant way of trying to take the thread off topic.

[AnneGuedes]

Another one who just shot themselves in the foot. Your reply has just proved that you ARE "omnipresent". You are here all the time. So consumed and addicted you can't log out?

Believe me or not, I didn't realize it was simple to log out... My daughter told me the other day I was slowing horribly my laptop having 30 sites open... most of them French and nothing to do with Madeleine.

[Redblossom]

Is it a myth? There's a difference between mentioning it and using it in a worldwide multimedia campaign.

true

I still wonder why Gerry Mccann decided he KNEW that when the police told him publicising his childs eye defect could get her  maimed or killed and he thought oh well its a good marketing ploy

[Lyall]

Sadie is not here and is not participating in the current discussion on this thread. Rather unfair to drag her into this, don't you think?

No I don't. Chill out Find a sense of humour Mo.

[Mo Stache]

I made the point that Gilet has made dozens if not hundreds of posts in the last week, you cant take mean numbers over time  as reflecting any point in time

Omnipresent is an indication of presents over time (being present all the time), not an indication of any point in time. 

[faithlilly]

No I don't. Chill out Find a sense of humour Mo.

Seems we have a rather fractious set of supporters online tonight. Can't imagine why ! 

[Mo Stache]

Believe me or not, I didn't realize it was simple to log out... My daughter told me the other day I was slowing horribly my laptop having 30 sites open... most of them French and nothing to do with Madeleine.

With respect, then you should have examined your own on line behaviour before accusing someone else or others of being "omnipresent".   

[Redblossom]

Ah so then lets rely on post count then.

As I said, almost 300% more than me.

3543

1267

Pot calling kettle, I believe.

Your calling me omnipresent here is a really daft way to try to abuse me and a blatant way of trying to take the thread off topic.

you really need to chill out Gilet


You come on here so aggressively like a rottweiler and  going for the jugular of so many posters then have  the nerve to accuse people of abuse, when you dish it it out all the time  directly or indirectly when they only question you, or reply, unbelievable...have a word with yourself and read the book how to make friends and influence people or whatever that self help book is called today LOL

[Mo Stache]

No I don't. Chill out Find a sense of humour Mo.

I do have a sense of humour, but still I don't feel it right the way you wanted to use Sadie as an example when she wasn't part of the conversation.

[gilet]

If its about missing people in general then why bring in the Madeleine case a specific example of not been afforded all these publicity avenues
You should remember in all this  Madeleine has been the MOST PUBLICISED missing child in the world
So your argument as I said falls down from the beginning, give it up
What the Portuguese authorities thinkings about publication is or isnt I dont know and why...amaral certainly wanted to go against it.....seeing as he sent a memo pdq on 4th may to allow publicity...to say in Britain we do this and that and its better, maybe,  I dont know, you would have to compare countey stats for missing people found, but as I said, whole thread is an  unadulterated Amaral bash, naughty, when even you concede it wasnt after all about HIM, tryharder next time, we aint all stupid

I can't believe that you constantly show up the fact that you are not reading properly.

Nowhere in the OP or till the topic was introduced did I mention Madeleine McCann or that case. It was anti McCann posters who could not (as you are proving with this post) understand the simple logic of the OP.#

I have already complstely answered your comments about the Madeleine McCann case being the most publicised even though it is irrelevant to the OP. It is just a shame that you are repeating yourself.

Your attempt to pretend this is simply Amaral bashing are pathetic.

If you cannot understand that the thread is about the whole difference between the Portuguese system and that which holds sway in other civilised countries then I am sorry for that. If you cannot understand that the quote from Amaral was used as evidence of that general belief then I suggest you re-read the quote itself and note the fact that it is far wider than just his opinion.

If you cannot understand that I used Amaral as an example because he chose to publish that particular phrase in his book then I suggest you re-read the full explanation I gave earlier.