What is it? Persecution or Harassment

[carlymichelle]

Please don't mix up the Holocaust with the McCann saga, this is indecent.

agree i hate the way pros think the world  revolves around the mcanns  it  doesnt and that isa low  thing to compare their case  too

[Redblossom]

i cant believe how rude some of the pros have  been to anne all she   did  was   translate court they would have bitched if nobody did

whats that to do with this thread carly but yes, if the libel trial reports were favouring the mccann side you would  have NO complaints on the reporting,and asking to see the notes, people saying  their biased etc etc, guaranteed
 

[gilet]

A whole page from two [ censored word] completely disrupting the topic.
And they try to pretend that they are not attempting to close down the debate.

[Redblossom]

A whole page from two [ censored word] completely disrupting the topic.
And they try to pretend that they are not attempting to close down the debate.

Whats a WHOLE page on ten of *alledged disruption*
 


Still waiting for your answer to my question on post 119

[icabodcrane]

A whole page from two [ censored word] completely disrupting the topic.
And they try to pretend that they are not attempting to close down the debate.

What debate gilet  ?

Where an opening statement is made,  and all contributors are in agreement,  there  IS no debate

This thread was an excercise in trouble-making,  nothing more

It's happening more and more since the influx of new members the trial has brought 

[Redblossom]

What debate gilet  ?

Where an opening statement is made,  and all contributors are in agreement,  there  IS no debate

This thread was an excercise in trouble-making,  nothing more

It's happening more and more since the influx of new members the trial has brought

well said


@Lizz I would have no reason to think anyone was FALSIFYING COURT PROCEEDINGS!!!!!

pro anti middle neutrons protons electrons  or any alien whether yellow green or blue or mushrooms for a stir fry


Simples as that i would just trust they reported, and wouldnt go accusing of bias unless there was any proof after the events aka a court transcript

[Redblossom]

and I should believe you because ?

no one is asking u to believe me you asked a question i answered, end of, the rest is your problem alone

[Redblossom]

what a cop out ..didn't expect anything else tbh ..but hay ho

What cop out? i answered your question' and then you asked why you should believe me, well its up to you to believe people or not, im not JESUS,who you just should believe if thats your penchance LOL im giving a personal opinion/answer

 

Youre being obtuse

Sigh hay ho whatever etc

[gilet]

What debate gilet  ?

Where an opening statement is made,  and all contributors are in agreement,  there  IS no debate

This thread was an excercise in trouble-making,  nothing more

It's happening more and more since the influx of new members the trial has brought

Clearly you have not read the whole thread or you would not post such an incorrect summation.

[icabodcrane]

Clearly you have not read the whole thread or you would not post such an incorrect summation.

Well would you be kind enough to remind me  ...  what  point in the  'debate'  had we reached before it was interrupted  ? 

and just for clarity what was the opposing point of view posed to the opening post  ?

[Jazzy]

Oh dont be so ridiculous, no one is tryng to cover up anythng that has been on the media and tv and on forums, and in kates book now as well, youre losing it gilet
 

What is it youwant? People to go self flagellate? The people that did those things and anyne else who posted on same forums they were on?? Even though they thought their actions were bad????
 

I rarely, if ever saw anyone posting on those forums congratulating those who behaved in the way described stand up and say they thought "their actions were bad".

[Redblossom]

I rarely, if ever saw anyone posting on those forums congratulating those who behaved in the way described stand up and say they thought "their actions were bad".

Did you mean to post that?  How silly.

Go take it up on those forums then instead of polluting this one with ancient gripes that have nothing to do with this forum or its members.

[Benita]

]"NEITHER HER PARENTS OR ANY MEMBER OF THE GROUP THAT WERE WITH HER ARE EITHER PERSONS OF INTEREST OR SUSPECTS." -DCI REDWOOD

 

[C.Edwards]

]"NEITHER HER PARENTS OR ANY MEMBER OF THE GROUP THAT WERE WITH HER ARE EITHER PERSONS OF INTEREST OR SUSPECTS." -DCI REDWOOD

 

Just wondering something out loud here.  If - hypothetically, of course - the parents and/or other members of the group WERE, in fact persons of interest or suspects, what would Redwood have said?  Would he have announced that to the world's media and had the associated furore blow up?  Would he have kept quiet altogether and had the suspicion/innuendo gathering pace (as it would, inevitably, have done) or... and this is just a wild stab here... would he have just said "they're not persons of interest" as he knows that they will be largely left alone for now and SY can get on with whatever they're doing.

If, and again this is entirely hypothetical, they were actually persons of interest and subsequently were investigated/charged/whatever then what are they going to do...? Sue SY for misinformation?

Just sayin'

[Jazzy]

Did you mean to post that?  How silly.

Go take it up on those forums then instead of polluting this one with ancient gripes that have nothing to do with this forum or its members.

It was you who raised the point, if you can't answer the reply, there really is no need to resort to insults.