Gonçalo Amaral's wife writes to Kate McCann asking her to tell the truth!!

[Mr Gray]

You will find that those who support the MccANNS will think she had no right to write the letter and she should be ashamed of herself and those who support amaral will think she is in the right. I think she should keep her big mouth shut

[stephen25000]

You will find that those who support the MccANNS will think she had no right to write the letter and she should be ashamed of herself and those who support amaral will think she is in the right. I think she should keep her big mouth shut

'You will find that those who support the MccANNS will think she had no right to write the letter'

WHAT A PRETENTIOUS AND ARROGANT THING TO SAY.

[Mr Gray]

'You will find that those who support the MccANNS will think she had no right to write the letter'

WHAT A PRETENTIOUS AND ARROGANT THING TO SAY.

Have you got your head in the sand.......read the posts...I think  her letter is pretentiious  and arrogant

[stephen25000]

Have you got your head in the sand.......read the posts...I think  her letter is pretentiious  and arrogant

Of course you do, you support the Mccanns.

Now just remind me............

Which 2 people are responsible for this whole case ?

Tough question, isn't it.

[Mr Gray]

Of course you do, you support the Mccanns.

Now just remind me............

Which 2 people are responsible for this whole case ?

Tough question, isn't it.

In my opinion the abductor is responsible for the case...I didn't realise there were two of them

[Redblossom]

Have you got your head in the sand.......read the posts...I think  her letter is pretentiious  and arrogant

Well you will point out which parts are pretentious then and arrogant


!


Seems a pretty simple letter to me, outlining facts, good on her!! I suppose if someone went on tv and called your wife a slag eg you wouldnt respond, hey? And very measured she was too.
 

[stephen25000]

In my opinion the abductor is responsible for the case...I didn't realise there were two of them

Once again the mythical abductor.

No just two people and we all know who they are,don't we davel ?

[Mr Gray]

Once again the mythical abductor.

No just two people and we all know who they are,don't we davel ?

The nutters on the internet think its Kate and Gerry, SY don't. Ill go with SY

[Rachel Granada]

The nutters on the internet think its Kate and Gerry, SY don't. Ill go with SY

Yes, I'm going with SY too.  They've been on this for almost 2 and a half years now and know much, much more than any conspiracy theorist on the net.

[stephen25000]

The nutters on the internet think its Kate and Gerry, SY don't. Ill go with SY

Really.

So who was it it that left 3 children in an unlocked apartment, unprotected, whilst they wined and dined ?

The tooth fairy ?

If that's the best you can do , go back to the drawing board.

If SY really had a clue, pun intended, Madeleine would have been found by now, or has that fact escaped your attention ?

I do wonder why the kind of almost religious devotion seen on here and elsewhere is given to this pair who placed their social recreation over their children's safety. 8-)(--)

[stephen25000]

Yes, I'm going with SY too.  They've been on this for almost 2 and a half years now and know much, much more than any conspiracy theorist on the net.

and they've found.........................

ZIP.

[AnneGuedes]

Your post just got me thinking, Anne.

What about the potential damage to the twins that could be caused by reading 'Madeleine'?

Or watching Gerry and Kate McCann in one of their many interviews - no 'Dr' Amaral in sight?

Couldn't the twins be damaged by the topics under discussion -or by Kate's graphic descriptions? Will the McCanns, chez McCann, be banning their own book?

How can they ? The graphic reductive description is damaging not for what it is but for who wrote it.

[AnneGuedes]

I think Kate McCanns words were mild considering the circumstances.   If I was Amaral I would be more concerned about how to explain his criminal conviction to his daughter when that time arrives.   That's one thing he can't blame on the McCanns.

Don't you think better to leave curses to witches ?

[Rachel Granada]

Don't you think better to leave curses to witches ?

I think Leal has got that one covered.....

[Sherlock Holmes]

How can they ? The graphic reductive description is damaging not for what it is but for who wrote it.

[/b]

That's really what I mean. The fact that their parents have chosen to place sensitive personal material in the commercial domain - with the publication of 'Madeleine' - does not speak of any sensitivity to the twins.

Kate and Gerry can tell the twins that Amaral is a crook who has published for his own gain and doesn't care about the feelings of others. But what about 'Madeleine'? It may refute Amaral's thesis, but in so doing brings up topics that the McCanns are arguing they don't want the twins knowing about. Unless they prevented the twins from reading it, it is inevitable that the twins are going to encounter the ideas of Amaral. So why go to such great lengths to sue him?