Author Topic: Wendy Murphy on FOX  (Read 33629 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Wendy Murphy on FOX
« Reply #60 on: October 11, 2013, 01:23:24 PM »
wonder if they have a patsy in mind......
 >@@(*&)

to bring in Redwoods own words, some kind of resolution....but not meaning necessarily, in his own words, not verbatim, that it means solving it!



Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Wendy Murphy on FOX
« Reply #61 on: October 11, 2013, 01:28:08 PM »
wonder if they have a patsy in mind......
 >@@(*&)

to bring in Redwoods own words, some kind of resolution....but not meaning necessarily, in his own words, not verbatim, that it means solving it!

"I'm hopeful when we pursue those lines of inquiry that we will be able to bring some sort of resolution.

Whether we will be able to solve it is a different issue, but I hope that we will be able to have the ability to move the investigation on."

 >@@(*&)

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Wendy Murphy on FOX
« Reply #62 on: October 11, 2013, 01:32:36 PM »
"I'm hopeful when we pursue those lines of inquiry that we will be able to bring some sort of resolution.

Whether we will be able to solve it is a different issue, but I hope that we will be able to have the ability to move the investigation on."

 >@@(*&)

Yes, quite, thanks for that Lyall......such sophistry and egg shell crunching....worst than politicians, you never know what is actually being said or not said....but I guess police need to keep thngs close to their chest

 @)(++(*


Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Wendy Murphy on FOX
« Reply #63 on: October 11, 2013, 01:42:27 PM »
Yes, quite, thanks for that Lyall......such sophistry and egg shell crunching....worst than politicians, you never know what is actually being said or not said....but I guess police need to keep thngs close to their chest

 @)(++(*

He is a politician Red. I think by "move the investigation on" he means end it.

Offline jassi

Re: Wendy Murphy on FOX
« Reply #64 on: October 11, 2013, 01:43:22 PM »
Yes, quite, thanks for that Lyall......such sophistry and egg shell crunching....worst than politicians, you never know what is actually being said or not said....but I guess police need to keep thngs close to their chest

 @)(++(*

Or he's skipped ahead, read the last page of the script and knows how it's meant to end.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline DCI

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2585
  • Total likes: 6
  • Why are some folks so sick in the head!!!
Re: Wendy Murphy on FOX
« Reply #65 on: October 11, 2013, 01:43:31 PM »
I just thought, as there seem to be Portuguese nationals and / or residents on here, that they might know if this is usual.

You only have to look at the Casa Pia scandel case, CPN. To see how the system works.

The trial is one of the longest running in Portuguese history, started in September 2002. The first scandal was a whitewash.

Portuguese Judiciary Police (Polícia Judiciária) first accused the caretaker of a Casa Pia state-run children's home in 1981 of raping dozens of children over a period of 30 years, even though some reports of abuse pre-date the 1974 Carnation Revolution. Police accused the perpetrators of supplying children to men from Portugal and other countries, including to some prominent public figures in Portugal.[1] However, these early allegations did not result in any legal action.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casa_Pia_child_sexual_abuse_scandal
Kate's 500 Mile Cycle Challenge

https://www.justgiving.com/KateMcCann/

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Wendy Murphy on FOX
« Reply #66 on: October 11, 2013, 01:46:46 PM »
He is a politician Red. I think by "move the investigation on" he means end it.

such a shame they cant  just spit it out......but thats wishful thnking

LOL

 @ jassi, whose writing the script!

As for the OP, its another professional with an opinion,we have had dozens over the years,hardly worth getting worked up about....
« Last Edit: October 11, 2013, 01:55:59 PM by Redblossom »

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Wendy Murphy on FOX
« Reply #67 on: October 11, 2013, 02:01:06 PM »
Yes, I was surprised about her stance about the questions too.  Perhaps if Ms Murphy has researched things more thoroughly she would have known that many of these questions had already been answered in earlier interviews?
No, Rachel, and here's the rub. Mrs McCann made only one statement, then there was the timeline she signed. Both are contradictory.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Wendy Murphy on FOX
« Reply #68 on: October 11, 2013, 02:15:07 PM »
wonder if they have a patsy in mind......
 >@@(*&)

to bring in Redwoods own words, some kind of resolution....but not meaning necessarily, in his own words, not verbatim, that it means solving it!
The only good patsy is a dead one.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Wendy Murphy on FOX
« Reply #69 on: October 11, 2013, 02:18:13 PM »
The only good patsy is a dead one.
I am wondering if this emphasis on Germany has anything to so with Hewlett.

See Joana Morais latest blog

And IIRC KM has said in a couple interviews they believe the key lies in Germany!
« Last Edit: October 11, 2013, 02:20:03 PM by Redblossom »

Offline jassi

Re: Wendy Murphy on FOX
« Reply #70 on: October 11, 2013, 02:19:01 PM »
The only good patsy is a dead one.

Preferably one who spoke German.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Wendy Murphy on FOX
« Reply #71 on: October 11, 2013, 02:20:27 PM »
Preferably one who spoke German.

Precisely.

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Wendy Murphy on FOX
« Reply #72 on: October 11, 2013, 02:25:33 PM »
The only good patsy is a dead one.

One that never actually existed would be even better. A virtual patsy.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Wendy Murphy on FOX
« Reply #73 on: October 11, 2013, 02:27:16 PM »
Looks like she's another know it all, and knows bu**ar all about the case.

Hired lawyers straight away?. Isn't that what accused people usually d?.

No lawyer was hired,  till September 2007.

One of Portugal’s best-known lawyers with reputation for taking on controversial cases. Pinto de Abreu has been in place since the start of September. He lodged McCanns’ libel action against Portuguese newspaper which said they were police suspects. De Abreu, a Lisbon lawyer, has offered his services to the McCanns for free.

10 September 2007

Nina Goswami
Kingsley Napley has been hired by the parents of Madeleine McCann to advise them on their legal rights.

7th SEPTEMBER QUESTIONS TO KATE McCANN

As has been said a million time, she had already answered these questions.

Another one after her 15 minutes, IMO.
No, DCI, on the 23th of August the McCanns gave all powers to Carlos P. de Abreu in order to request to the MP a statute of assistants in the process, according to article 68 n°1 of the CPP.

Offline jassi

Re: Wendy Murphy on FOX
« Reply #74 on: October 11, 2013, 02:34:33 PM »
One that never actually existed would be even better. A virtual patsy.

I thought we'd got that with abductorman .
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future