Andrew Hunter has come back out to play.

[goatboy]

I for one welcome Holly here-it's good to have a dissenting voice to debate with rather than have everyone agree with everything the others say. Like or loathe the blue forum (I loathe it and am proud to say I've been nowhere near it in months) at least there are some alternative points of view to the crazy tosh perpetuated by that forum.

But if Jeremy is going to get out of prison is a book going to help? Surely they need solid, irrefutable evidence that will overturn his conviction not more wild speculation dressed up as fact? He's going round in circles and nothing his team come up with holds any water at all. Mind you, I suppose you can't blame him for trying, what else can he do?

[Cariad]

And before you even GO there.....I've baggied "The Haunted Vagina."   

I'll see that and raise you this:

http://cdn.sobadsogood.net/wp-content/uploads/worst-book-covers-titles-12.jpeg

Seriously creepy! 

[Outlook]

And before you even GO there.....I've baggied "The Haunted Vagina."   

That is my Autobiography, I will have you know.

[Myster]

Cor Blimey, Outlook !!!, where have you been ?... back to the Orient for six months... I've missed you !

[Outlook]

Cor Blimey, Outlook !!!, where have you been ?... back to the Orient for six months... I've missed you !

Northern Italy Classical Tour.  I haven't been here for months because I cannot stand the MC Zombies.

Has it not dawned on Tesco and the Bamberettes yet that after 10,000 pieces of "stunning new evidence that will get JB out by the weekend" that it is all bollocks and they only way he is ever getting out of jail is in a box after he does the decent thing and ends his own worthless life?

Jeremy Bamber, the only guy that makes Jimmy Savile look like a reasonable member of society.

[Holly Goodhead]

Well Holly, you've blown his cover now... the blue keyboards will be smokin' hot (other than susan's).

From the title of the first book he's obviously "solved" the Whitechapel murders, like many others before and after. But why do we still not know who dun it ?

So I can't see any new revelations in January setting Bamber free. We'll be spoilt for choice as to which to read... but I'll give all three a miss, TYVM.

There were only two people who could have been responsible for the WHF murders, and it certainly wasn't Sheila Caffell.

Don't mention Susan to me pleeeeze. 

Apologies as we're going off thread here but moral dilemma/question...Susan posted up about a childhood experience she claims was painful namely bullied for being overweight.  I know the identity of Susan and have done for some considerable time and I know for sure this is false.  I've gone along with her alias but felt the above was a step too far.

As I knew it was false I ribbed her about it.  Others were quick to judge and I ended up with a ban.

1.  Should I have ignored Susan's tale and allow others to believe it?

2.  Is it ok to make up painful experiences for effect where real victims exist? 

 >@@(*&) >@@(*&) >@@(*&)









 

[John]

The first thing I would say given the bollox we have already seen in the Bamber case is that the photo is probably fake.  If it was an original crime scene photo the carpet would be beige and not green.  A body photographed in the morgue would not be lying on a contaminant such as a green blanket.

Had Sheila taken part in the assault on Nevill in the kitchen where a glass lampshade was shattered her feet would have had glass shards in them with the inevitable bloody smears.  The foot shown on that photograph shows no signs whatsoever of having had contact with broken glass.  Had there have been, there would have been dried/congealed blood in all the skin crevices.

[Holly Goodhead]

Surely Andrew Hunter and The Mail would have gone to some length to prove authenticity  8-)(--)

I rarely comment on the photos as I feel its pretty futile and requires a photographic expert such as Peter Sutherest to interpret.

I was never quite sure why the CCRC slung out PS's claims re the scratch marks on the mantle being made AFTER the relatives/police claim they were made.  I think CCRC took the view that police witness statements must take precedence? 

[John]

Authentic or not the photograph proves nothing as other members have pointed out so eloquently.

Andrew Hunter is a non entity, a political ghost.  I am surprised the Mail even considers his pointless rantings.

[Outlook]

Authentic or not the photograph proves nothing as other members have pointed out so eloquently.

Andrew Hunter is a non entity, a political ghost.  I am surprised the Mail even considers his pointless rantings.

Agreed but the Daily Fail is there only to sell newspapers not to establish the truth.  It is just another opportunity to publish a picture of a dead woman in a nightie to add to Tesco's fantasy folder, and he does have lots of gory fantasies about her....

Also is it just me or has Sheila "grown" an extra toe?  certainly something funny about what would have normally been her "little toe"  Maybe she was just a martyr to her bunions?

The only reason that Peter Sutherest keeps getting dragged out of the closet as an "expert" is that he has been "helpful" to the Bamberettes in the past.  Tesco worships "experts" that are helpful to his deranged rants and upholds that "anything an expert says is a FACT!" (his emphasis not mine, I do not trust any "expert", they are paid hacks like anyone else, pay your "expert" and get your answer).

Interestingly Peter Vanezis varies wildly in Tesco's eyes as an "expert of unparalleled genius" to "an incompetent that conspired to get beloved little Jeremy banged up" depending on the exact piece of evidence under discussion.  It is sad that someone who has given so much service to this country is so ill-used by such a deranged individual.

The Bamberettes would better employ their time examining their own and of course Tesco's motivations for the Bamber campaigns which have contributed so much to ensuring JB is a laughing stock and that any appeal he has made has been totally undermined.

[Holly Goodhead]

Authentic or not the photograph proves nothing as other members have pointed out so eloquently.

Andrew Hunter is a non entity, a political ghost.  I am surprised the Mail even considers his pointless rantings.

Eloquent or not, only opinions from photographic experts are capable of advancing this potentially new evidence.

I take it you're not a fan of Andrew Hunter/his views.  I find it surprising that a former right wing mp is taking up a potential moj.  Makes a change from the usual suspects ie the George Galloway's of this world. 

[Angelo222]

Eloquent or not, only opinions from photographic experts are capable of advancing this potentially new evidence.

I take it you're not a fan of Andrew Hunter/his views.  I find it surprising that a former right wing mp is taking up a potential moj.  Makes a change from the usual suspects ie the George Galloway's of this world.

Another dodgy photo like the Sheila on the bed one. 

Thing is peeps... the uninformed will believe this nonsense...thankfully most of us who have studied the Bamber case know it is baloney.

[Holly Goodhead]

Agreed but the Daily Fail is there only to sell newspapers not to establish the truth.  It is just another opportunity to publish a picture of a dead woman in a nightie to add to Tesco's fantasy folder, and he does have lots of gory fantasies about her....

Also is it just me or has Sheila "grown" an extra toe?  certainly something funny about what would have normally been her "little toe"  Maybe she was just a martyr to her bunions?

The only reason that Peter Sutherest keeps getting dragged out of the closet as an "expert" is that he has been "helpful" to the Bamberettes in the past.  Tesco worships "experts" that are helpful to his deranged rants and upholds that "anything an expert says is a FACT!" (his emphasis not mine, I do not trust any "expert", they are paid hacks like anyone else, pay your "expert" and get your answer).

Interestingly Peter Vanezis varies wildly in Tesco's eyes as an "expert of unparalleled genius" to "an incompetent that conspired to get beloved little Jeremy banged up" depending on the exact piece of evidence under discussion.  It is sad that someone who has given so much service to this country is so ill-used by such a deranged individual.

The Bamberettes would better employ their time examining their own and of course Tesco's motivations for the Bamber campaigns which have contributed so much to ensuring JB is a laughing stock and that any appeal he has made has been totally undermined.

Whatever any "expert" comes up with obviously has to pass the CCRC and appeal court judges before Jeremy gets to mimic the sketch his pal drew of him standing on the steps outside the CoA with a raised fist     Quite a filter I would say    Something tells me though that a new dawn is on the horizon.  We shall see......

[Holly Goodhead]

Another dodgy photo like the Sheila on the bed one. 

Thing is peeps... the uninformed will believe this nonsense...thankfully most of us who have studied the Banner case know it is baloney.

At least this one is available and not just a figment of a certain person's rather fertile imagination.

[Outlook]

At least this one is available and not just a figment of a certain person's rather fertile imagination.

Tesco has never been above photoshopping images in the past.  He loves it but the only saving grace is he is so bad at it.  Wax crayons would be a better tool in his case.

This will go nowhere, just an opportunity for the Daily Fail to publish "soft necro-porn."

The need for experts has changed, old photos were chemicals on paper.  Modern ones are pixels and can be analysed mathematically but nothing can be decided from a newspaper image.  You need the original negs and then know the scanning method, the file type... the list goes on.