SY claim the man Tanner saw had collected his child from the night creche ?

[carlymichelle]

willl those   who have said for years this man took maddie apologize??

[icabodcrane]

A "get out" card from what?  I'd also echo what other posters have said, why should this gentleman's name be released?

This  'gentleman'  has, apparently,  allowed the police to waste resources for six years ...  looking for a suspected abductor  who did not exist   ...   and,  in the meanwhile,  a missing child to be suffering God knows what  !

 

[Victoria]

I don't think it should be either. But I don't believe the person exists for a minute!  Or if they do there were nowhere near the vicinity of the McCann apartment.  They had no earthly reason to be there at that time.  The coincidence of them just happening to wander past at that exact moment is so enormous that there aren't enough zeroes in mathematics to cope.

Just to be clear then - you think the Met is making it up?

[Cariad]

Those PJ's picture described by DC thingy as 'uncannily similar' did look remarkably different to me. The colour, the lack of ruffles...

I suspect that JT might have been desperately trying to help. I hope she's not blaming herself now.

[AnneGuedes]

I don't think it should be either. But I don't believe the person exists for a minute!  Or if they do there were nowhere near the vicinity of the McCann apartment.  They had no earthly reason to be there at that time.  The coincidence of them just happening to wander past at that exact moment is so enormous that there aren't enough zeroes in mathematics to cope.

The PJ Files can't be bypassed. If Faceless Bundleman is real and if his statement is sufficient to put the events of that night in a quite different perspective, allowing to understand what happened, how it happened and who made it happen, then SY has to present this evidence to the MP in order to reopen the case.

[sadie]

As far as I am concerned Bundleman and the Jane Tanner sighting are firmly back in the picture

[John]

He  (  the man thought to be the 'abductor'    for over six years  )  has come now come  forward  to explain it was almost certainly  him  that Jane saw that night

He was carrying his own child who he had collected from the night creche

Can someone tell me where  the night creche is  ?  ...  and would someone leaving it be emerging from the the back of the McCann's apartment block  ?

The night crèche is above the main Ocean Club reception Icabodcrane.  You know, way down the village towards the beach. 

This has all been discussed at length before, there was no reason for this man carrying a child to emerge from the west when the crèche was way to the south relative to Ocean Club Garden.

[sika]

A man, some hours back, was horribly accused to have kept his feeling the little girl he saw was Madeleine. In spite of having been informed the original statement didn't say so, the same poster insisted in vilifying the man.
Now CW has exhibited another man coming from nowhere but untouchable who has through his silence obstructed the PJ investigation and some posters applaud !
What about Ms Tanner who put Madeleine's pyjamas on ex-Bundleman's daughter ? From pyjamas to Madeleine, a quick step that obstructed the investigation as well.

The use of the word 'obstructed' seems to suggest something sinister. 

[C.Edwards]

Just to be clear then - you think the Met is making it up?

I think they have found someone in the files who has vaguely alluded to picking their child up at a vaguely similar time in a vaguely similar part of the resort and creatively put them altogether in a neat little package, yes. I don't doubt that "a guest" exists. I do doubt that their story anything like matched what crimewatch just spewed out!

[C.Edwards]

As far as I am concerned Bundleman and the Jane Tanner sighting are firmly back in the picture

Isn't this a bit like a christian picking and choosing which bits of the bible to believe in?  Surely as the other McCann supporters will say, SY know best?

[sika]

I think they have found someone in the files who has vaguely alluded to picking their child up at a vaguely similar time in a vaguely similar part of the resort and creatively put them altogether in a neat little package, yes. I don't doubt that "a guest" exists. I do doubt that their story anything like matched what crimewatch just spewed out!

How do we know? For obvious reasons, it's something the programme failed to dwell on.

[John]

As far as I am concerned Bundleman and the Jane Tanner sighting are firmly back in the picture

Have you lost all confidence in Scotland Yard now Sadie since they have binned the Tanner sighting.  They say they are "almost certain".

[AnneGuedes]

Those PJ's picture described by DC thingy as 'uncannily similar' did look remarkably different to me. The colour, the lack of ruffles...

I suspect that JT might have been desperately trying to help. I hope she's not blaming herself now.

I suspect that Mr Redwood, to save the face, is ready to make a lot of faceless guys jump out of his black top hat.

[carlymichelle]

Have you lost all confidence in Scotland Yard now Sadie since they have binned the Tanner sighting.  They say they are "almost certain".

john bare in mind i have not watched the   show but  is that  SY    saying there is no evidence of  a bndleman being in the area  of the mcanns apartment at the time of maddies  vvanaishing??

[sika]

I've yet to read a credible reason to explain why this man has taken so long to come forward.