Has Amaral now been vindicated? The Tanner sighting was of no consequence.

[Jazzy]

Do you have proof they did ?

You are absolutely ridiculous. Do you have "proof" they didn't? Let's see your "proof".

[Redblossom]

Isn't it though, current as in new and ongoing.

No, the specific line of inquiry that the PJ gave evidence to the AG of to reopen the case.....

[carlymichelle]

in big  denial today i see are the pros

[Redblossom]

Wishful thinking IMO Red.    I don't think they would have entertained seeing and speaking to the McCanns if they thought there was the slightest chance that they could be  potential suspects. 

(Must go out now)

Nope, nothng to do with wishful thinking.....you need to be more discerning when you read, try reading more widely too

[Jazzy]

No, the specific line of inquiry that the PJ gave evidence to the AG of to reopen the case.....

Twist it all you want. You are wrong. Unless that is you can produce "proof".

[Cariad]

Have the PJ now released a statement saying the Mccanns are no longer suspects then, or is this still the quote from the Mccanns lawyer that is being bandied around like fact?

[Jazzy]

in big  denial today i see are the pros

Really? Please share your insight with me, one of "the pros". What am I denying?

[Redblossom]

It seems I and at least one other can't quote imustpointout. Why is that?

That report says all relevant information was passed on to the police.

thats because they havent written anything to quote, just inserted a quote themselves

And yes, the operative word is relevant....someone decides what is relevant...in this case seems someone decided it wasnt

[Jazzy]

thats because they havent written anything to quote, just inserted a quote themselves

And yes, the operative word is relevant....someone decides what is relevant...in this case seems someone decided it wasnt

But the efits were with the police, so they weren't decided to be irrelevant.

Unless you can prove they were?

[Redblossom]

Twist it all you want. You are wrong. Unless that is you can produce "proof".

Not twisting anything at all, just posted the facts...from the mccanns own lawyers mouth

http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2013/10/rogerio-alves-mccanns-lawyer-new.html

now, lets have YOUR evidence that the Mccanns are not considered suspects in any way shape form or in any other potential future line of inquiry

[imustpointout]

It seems I and at least one other can't quote imustpointout. Why is that?

That report says all relevant information was passed on to the police.

I have now edited my post so that it can be quoted.

here it is "A spokesman for Find Madeleine said “all information privately gathered” had been “fully acted upon where necessary” and passed on to Scotland Yard."

[Redblossom]

But the efits were with the police, so they weren't decided to be irrelevant.

Unless you can prove they were?

Sigh

Were they? Says who? Which police? PJ or SY? Oh never mind....

[Jazzy]

Sigh

Were they? Says who? Oh never mind

Who says they weren't?
*sigh*

[Benita]

Have the PJ now released a statement saying the Mccanns are no longer suspects then, or is this still the quote from the Mccanns lawyer that is being bandied around like fact?

why don't you write to the pj and ask them ..why they havent issued a statement that the mcCanns are not suspects...

the pj haven't denied that statement from the mcCanns lawyer and DCI Redwood
===================================================

[imustpointout]

"Yet it also means that what could be the key e-fit lay under wraps for several years. "It was passed to the Portuguese police at the time and for whatever reason they decided to nothing whatsoever with it," said one source close to the McCann investigation. "It was then handed to the Met two years ago, and they have now deemed it worthy of publication, but frankly it should have been out there a long time ago.""

Telegraph 19/10/13 - before the Sunday Times article

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/10391348/Madeleine-McCann-is-there-hope-at-last.html