Author Topic: Does Cipriano's convictions let Amaral and the PJ off the hook?  (Read 88057 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline jassi

Re: Does Cipriano's convictions let Amaral and the PJ off the hook?
« Reply #75 on: October 19, 2013, 08:21:21 AM »
This is something that has baffled me  (  and not just with regard to Amaral either   )  ... it seems there is a compulsion  to malign and denigrate  anyone  who might be seen to pose even the slightest doubt on  the McCanns'  version of events

Amply demonstrated by Benice's post 76 above this one.
« Last Edit: October 19, 2013, 08:58:22 AM by jassi »
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Does Cipriano's convictions let Amaral and the PJ off the hook?
« Reply #76 on: October 19, 2013, 08:47:48 AM »
i have davel  on permanant ignore never online has someone annoyed me so much with their passive agressive posts

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Does Cipriano's convictions let Amaral and the PJ off the hook?
« Reply #77 on: October 19, 2013, 08:52:07 AM »
i have davel  on permanant ignore never online has someone annoyed me so much with their passive agressive posts

Thank heavens

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Does Cipriano's convictions let Amaral and the PJ off the hook?
« Reply #78 on: October 19, 2013, 06:44:55 PM »
despite all the cries I was wrong no one has managed to prove such.
to recap and perhaps close the thread the cipriano torture case was featured on The Amnesty website until 2012 when the case was finalised. none of these statements have been removed.
 the case was never featured on the 2013 site because the case was concluded in 2013 so again nothing was removed. 

Cariad

  • Guest
Re: Does Cipriano's convictions let Amaral and the PJ off the hook?
« Reply #79 on: October 19, 2013, 07:29:43 PM »
despite all the cries I was wrong no one has managed to prove such.
to recap and perhaps close the thread the cipriano torture case was featured on The Amnesty website until 2012 when the case was finalised. none of these statements have been removed.
 the case was never featured on the 2013 site because the case was concluded in 2013 so again nothing was removed.

None of that changes the fact that you accused Serendipity of changing the documents. Why don't you close the thread with a nice apology?


Offline Mr Gray

Re: Does Cipriano's convictions let Amaral and the PJ off the hook?
« Reply #80 on: October 19, 2013, 07:34:46 PM »
None of that changes the fact that you accused Serendipity of changing the documents. Why don't you close the thread with a nice apology?

Apology?  First Edwards claimed I was wrong..yet he was wrong and has failed to offer one post in his defence.
secondly serendipity did change the document...I asked him several times if he had and he would not reply..the evidence has been removed..I don't know why..Edwards should apologise to me

icabodcrane

  • Guest
Re: Does Cipriano's convictions let Amaral and the PJ off the hook?
« Reply #81 on: October 19, 2013, 07:39:37 PM »
Admin  ...  maybe you could change the title of this  thread to  "Welcome to the hairsplitters convention "

 8)-)))

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Does Cipriano's convictions let Amaral and the PJ off the hook?
« Reply #82 on: October 19, 2013, 07:43:11 PM »
Admin  ...  maybe you could change the title of this  thread to  "Welcome to the hairsplitters convention "

 8)-)))

remember the thread was started by Edwards..or perhaps you had forgotten that

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Does Cipriano's convictions let Amaral and the PJ off the hook?
« Reply #83 on: October 19, 2013, 09:25:06 PM »
Admin  ...  maybe you could change the title of this  thread to  "Welcome to the hairsplitters convention "

 8)-)))

You seem to want to gloss over that both edawrds and serendipity made outrageous claims that Amnesty had removed information from their website re Amaral..if this was true it would have been quite significant.
However I was able to show that what they were posting was totally untrue and it his highly significant that neither of them has made any defence of their initial inaccurate claims

C.Edwards

  • Guest
Re: Does Cipriano's convictions let Amaral and the PJ off the hook?
« Reply #84 on: October 19, 2013, 09:34:19 PM »
Remind me...  Which one is the 'laughing at davel'  smiley? I'm pretty sure I need it!

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Does Cipriano's convictions let Amaral and the PJ off the hook?
« Reply #85 on: October 19, 2013, 09:36:19 PM »
Remind me...  Which one is the 'laughing at davel'  smiley? I'm pretty sure I need it!

im pretty sure you need it too..in order to divert attention away from the fact that you were wrong

C.Edwards

  • Guest
Re: Does Cipriano's convictions let Amaral and the PJ off the hook?
« Reply #86 on: October 19, 2013, 09:37:57 PM »
im pretty sure you need it too..in order to divert attention away from the fact that you were wrong

Dammit,  where's my davel bingo card when I need it!?  Oh what the heck...  "house!".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Does Cipriano's convictions let Amaral and the PJ off the hook?
« Reply #87 on: October 19, 2013, 09:40:39 PM »
Dammit,  where's my davel bingo card when I need it!?  Oh what the heck...  "house!".

i was almost expecting sensible response but yet another attempt to divert attention...

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Does Cipriano's convictions let Amaral and the PJ off the hook?
« Reply #88 on: October 19, 2013, 09:41:44 PM »
Remind me...  Which one is the 'laughing at davel'  smiley? I'm pretty sure I need it!

 @)(++(*


Offline Mr Gray

Re: Does Cipriano's convictions let Amaral and the PJ off the hook?
« Reply #89 on: October 19, 2013, 09:44:23 PM »
@)(++(*

i thought you had me on permanent ignore..if so you shouldn't comment on my post..doesn't really matter...your post again does not address the issue and is yet another attempt to divert.