PM query .

[Mr Gray]

[ censored word] don't post about the McCanns the way pros do about Amaral.  No wonder they get reprimanded.

Do the [ censored word] make personal comments about what the McCanns wear, what they look like etc...  People in glass houses comes to mind.

Angelo..it was you who posted theMcCanns were shit parents

[John]

Angelo..it was you who posted theMcCanns were shit parents

I think Angelo feels that anyone who endangers their children must be shit parents.  I must say I can't argue with that and would add irresponsible and negligent as well.

[Wonderfulspam]

I think Angelo feels that anyone who endangers their children must be shit parents.  I must say I can't argue with that and would add irresponsible and negligent as well.

Beat me to it John, they were shit parents on the night she dissapeared & probably most nights before.

[CPN]

I think Angelo feels that anyone who endangers their children must be shit parents.  I must say I can't argue with that and would add irresponsible and negligent as well.

I personally would never use that word - but would certainly use the phrase "irresponsible and negligent".  And much as there as people who argue against this, I really cannot see the actions of the McCanns in any other light

I reported someone for the first time the other day as they were writing general  negative comments on a whole group (race, if you like) of people which I felt was quite wrong.  These people were persecuted during WW2, and up to 220,000 were executed in various ways.  I felt that to encourage feelings against them again now as a total group was quite wrong; and I myself was glad that there was a way of bringing this sort of posting to the attention of the mods

[Mr Gray]

that's angelos opinion and that's fine but for him to suggest that the [ censored word] don't abuse the mccanns is not correct

Edted due to post removal

[Eleanor]

As no doubt was I and many others, a shit parent, in the opinion of some.  But it is just an opinion.  I have never purported to being perfect.  And God preserve me from those who do. But I can't help wondering if their children had half as much fun as mine did while I was neglecting them.

Edioted due to post removal

[John]

Everyone gets the same messages Ben

Not always but in this case the clue for Ben should be in the header,

To ALL members!

[C.Edwards]

well if you going to call the mccanns shit parents how about amaral ?
hes a shit parent drinking and driving with his child in the car that's neglect at the highest I would say endangering his daughters life.

1. Amaral didn't "lose" a daughter
2. Where's your evidence for this accusation?

[Mr Gray]

Not always but in this case the clue for Ben should be in the header,

To ALL members!

they may get the same message but you have just supported a poster being abusive towards the McCanns. that's up to you but for angelo to say that the [ censored word] are abusive and the pros aren't is ridiculous

[lizzibif.]

1. Amaral didn't "lose" a daughter
2. Where's your evidence for this accusation?

maybe luck was on his side but he very well could of ...wheres your evidence the mccanns lost a daughter ? they didn't lose her she was taken from her bed...why do you think SY got the case reopened "Abduction"

[Mr Gray]

I personally would never use that word - but would certainly use the phrase "irresponsible and negligent".  And much as there as people who argue against this, I really cannot see the actions of the McCanns in any other light

I reported someone for the first time the other day as they were writing general  negative comments on a whole group (race, if you like) of people which I felt was quite wrong.  These people were persecuted during WW2, and up to 220,000 were executed in various ways.  I felt that to encourage feelings against them again now as a total group was quite wrong; and I myself was glad that there was a way of bringing this sort of posting to the attention of the mods

I find your post ridiculous...what has genocide got to do with any post I have made. Why did the original article refer to the family as roma..perhaps tahts where the prejudice started but you missed that. My opinion is that  the gypsy fraternity(roma ..tinker ...traveller) have a well deserved reputation for dishonesty. They also, as agroup ride roughshod over planning law and  pay very little income tax.

[lizzibif.]

Oh my. It's another davel.

"could have" please. "Could of" is appalling English usage.  The fact is, he didn't.  The McCanns had three children, they currently have two accounted for. They have lost one.  My statement is pure fact. How that daughter came to be lost is a matter of debate and such it is, ceaselessly.

I have no interest in, nor opinion of, your deflection question.

What has English usage got to do with the title of this thread ..not interested in my opinion then don't reply "simples" 

[C.Edwards]

As no doubt was I and many others, a shit parent, in the opinion of some.  But it is just an opinion.  I have never purported to being perfect.  And God preserve me from those who do. But I can't help wondering if their children had half as much fun as mine did while I was neglecting them.

But what's to stop anyone saying you are a sh!t parent if that's their opinion?  It may not bother you, it may not bother the McCanns and I totally fail to see why it bothers a whole bunch of people enough to start carting abuse at those that don't agree with their more favourable opinions of the McCanns.  It's like that "leave Britney alone" weirdo all over again.

[CPN]

I find your post ridiculous...what has genocide got to do with any post I have made. Why did the original article refer to the family as roma..perhaps tahts where the prejudice started but you missed that. My opinion is that  the gypsy fraternity(roma ..tinker ...traveller) have a well deserved reputation for dishonesty. They also. as agroup ride roughshod over planning law and also pay very little income tax.

I carefully did not name you and the thread has been deleted.   I missed nothing by the way.   But you have started the abuse again - and people suggest only the "[ censored word]" are abusive.   Genocide starts when one group of people are treated as outside society by others, and all members of that group are treated as outsiders.

I shall not answer further and I hope admin will remove all these references as they did the previous thread.

A shame, as you at least had the decently to virtually apologise to me for some of what you said the other day

[C.Edwards]

What has English usage got to do with the title of this thread ..not interested in my opinion then don't reply "simples" 

I'm just trying to keep up the standards around here.  As those who support the McCanns think it's ok to hurl abuse at anyone that disagrees with them and attack them for pretty much anything and everything, I thought it was fair game to attack your opinion based on your inability to use "Could have" instead of "Could of". No?  Well maybe people in glass houses and all that...

Where have I said I'm not interested in your opinion?  You stated things as facts, I asked for evidence to support those statements and you've been ducking and diving ever since. There's someone else around here that does that and no-one pays much attention to him any more because of it. Would be a shame for you to go the same way so early on.