Goncalo Amaral's thesis trashed by SY and PJ

[gilet]

SY doesn't trash anything because they are not investigating. They merely read the documents and formulate pro McCann hypothesis.

The PJ continues investigating and never stated any thesis. The Oporto team made a review that allowed for a reopening and now the investigation was given to the Portimão team. So far neither said anything about what they know what abot what they are doing.

You really are showing stunning ignorance of the facts now aren't you.

Scotland Yard are investigating. There are two separate investigations under way.

There were two reviews and now they have BOTH moved to investigations.

You only have to listen to the videos I have posted to know that.

And I think you may even be wrong about the investigation being given to a Faro team (it was never ever going to be Portimao). It seems that the Oporto team may be keeping the case.

[Lyall]

You seem to forget that the PJ have been working for two whole years reviewing all the previous evidence.

It is only after that review that they have CONCLUDED that the McCanns are not suspects.

Trying to pretend now that they still are is no more than clinging to a delusion.

Illusion

[gilet]

One good thing, I'm sure Amaral will be nowhere near this investigation.
I'd like to know why his work was supposeldy being investigated by the national directorate of the police judiciaire?

I have heard a rumour (no more than that at the moment) that he is being investigated alongside a number of other officers.

[sadie]

You know,  you really have no business  dimissing the  genuinely held opinion of another member with an arrogant  'QED'  ...  when you yourself have been proven to have stated something untruthful on the forum    (  and lacked the integrity to hold up your hand and say,  "OK I made a mistake there"  ) 

I'm refering to the witness you claimed,  said, with  certainty,  that Gerry McCann was in the tapas bar at 10.00pm 

If Anne makes an error she is always ready to acknowledge it  ...  you,  on the other hand,  are not

Err excuse me.

Anne has seen all the facts about the cadavar dogs and they were gone over in fine detail.  She MUST know by now about the criteria that decide whether the dogs had found a cadavar, or not, so why was she obfuscating?


Please remove your claim that gilet lied.  There are witnesses that Gerry was in the Tapas restaurant ... and you cant supply any witnesses that he was NOT

Pros get banned or heavily penalised for calling people liars, when the peeps have actually lied. 

[gilet]

You know,  you really have no business  dimissing the  genuinely held opinion of another member with an arrogant  'QED'  ...  when you yourself have been proven to have stated something untruthful on the forum    (  and lacked the integrity to hold up your hand and say,  "OK I made a mistake there"  ) 

I'm refering to the witness you claimed,  said, with  certainty,  that Gerry McCann was in the tapas bar at 10.00pm 

If Anne makes an error she is always ready to acknowledge it  ...  you,  on the other hand,  are not

Did you read the post I was replying to?

I thought not.

It concluded with an arrogant QED.

What a hypocrite!

The witness I proved put Gerry in the Tapas at the time specified by the Smiths did exist. Anne Guedes was wrong when she claimed otherwise.

[gilet]

  theres going to be a lot of doubters eating humble pie 

Really?

I think not!

Even Amaral's mate from Viseu, Claudia and FSoares from the Ministry of Justice in Lisbon are telling us his thesis has been effectively trashed by the PJ and SY announcements and that the McCanns are not suspects.

[AnneGuedes]

It is only after that review that they have CONCLUDED that the McCanns are not suspects.

Trying to pretend now that they still are is no more than clinging to a delusion.

Nothing of that kind has yet been concluded. It might happen though (let's hope that the second time they'll be offered to prove their innocence they'll take the chance), but take care not to cling to a delusion yourself.

[icabodcrane]

Did you read the post I was replying to?

I thought not.

It concluded with an arrogant QED.

What a hypocrite!

The witness I proved put Gerry in the Tapas at the time specified by the Smiths did exist. Anne Guedes was wrong when she claimed otherwise.

I won't let this drop gilet

You are not telling the truth

What is that witness's name  ...  and what did he say,  with certainty,  about seeing Gerry McCann in the tapas bar at precisely 10pm   ? 

You  must  answer  ...  or retract

You simply must

[gilet]

The McCanns criminal lawyer   (  why do they  need a criminal lawyer anyway  ?  )  is being very vocal on their behalf isn't he  ?

What part of  'the investigation is at a critical stage and secrecy is imperative'  do they not understand

It makes a bit of a mockery of that statement the McCanns released,  doesn't it  ?  ...  'Kate and Gerry won't be making any further comment'

...  but their lawyer will be singing like a canary  !

They need a criminal lawyer to pursue their request to become assistentes in this Criminal Investigation against the persons who took their child.

It seems a very valid need in my opinion.

And Alves is giving absolutely nothing away about the actual investigation, or had you not noticed that? Perhaps you forgot but there is no longer an investigation into the imaginations of Amaral about the McCanns. It is now focusing rightly on who took the missing little girl.

[gilet]

Illusion

Delusion.

[gilet]

Nothing of that kind has yet been concluded. It might happen though (let's hope that the second time they'll be offered to prove their innocence they'll take the chance), but take care not to cling to a delusion yourself.

Still clinging on I see.

Even when the PJ have actually announced their conclusion that the McCanns are no longer suspects.

That really is rather odd behaviour.

I am sticking to absolute facts. There is nothing whatsoever delusional about my posting. But you can carry on believing that Amaral's thesis still holds sway and that the PJ and SY (who have publicly stated otherwise) still think the McCanns are suspects. That is real delusion.

[AnneGuedes]

I have heard a rumour (no more than that at the moment) that he is being investigated alongside a number of other officers.

Spreading rumours now ?

[gilet]

I won't let this drop gilet

You are not telling the truth

What is that witness's name  ...  and what did he say,  with certainty,  about seeing Gerry McCann in the tapas bar at precisely 10pm   ? 

You  must  answer  ...  or retract

You simply must

Luz has already posted the page.
I gave the full quotation and page number last night.
You are seeking a retraction which will never happen because I have only stated the absolute truth with full evidence.

And your petulant demands are not just rude, they are insolently rude and becoming extremely boring.

[gilet]

Spreading rumours now ?

I clearly indicated that it was only a rumour. I made no allusion to it being accurate.

[sadie]

I won't let this drop gilet

You are not telling the truth

What is that witness's name  ...  and what did he say,  with certainty,  about seeing Gerry McCann in the tapas bar at precisely 10pm   ? 

You  must  answer  ...  or retract

You simply must

Dianne webster did.  Then one of the waiters saw Gerry searching by the Tapas/ pool whilst Dianne Webster was still sitting there, immediately after the alarm wasgiven

Also the PJ and SY will know the facts.  Doesn't have to be mentioned in specific statements.  But the PJ under Amaral did NOT have anything to charge Gerry or Kate with, so they knew Gerry was there.

Cant think why you think you know better than the authorities.

Kate and Gerry are cleared .  OK ?

Now where is YOUR proof that Gerry was NOT there?