Author Topic: Goncalo Amaral's thesis trashed by SY and PJ  (Read 61419 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Goncalo Amaral's thesis trashed by SY and PJ
« Reply #165 on: October 26, 2013, 12:01:32 PM »
Not in my view it isn't.

Serving police officers still have access to files no matter how hard you try to pretend otherwise especially when those files are largely paper based and not subject to secure id checks on computer systems.

Relax gilet. There's nothing in the book that wasn't already in the public domain.

Offline imustpointout

Re: Goncalo Amaral's thesis trashed by SY and PJ
« Reply #166 on: October 26, 2013, 12:02:56 PM »
But Amaral went much further in his many media appearances and articles

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Goncalo Amaral's thesis trashed by SY and PJ
« Reply #167 on: October 26, 2013, 12:04:15 PM »
I have yet to read all of the book all these years later, because it contained no surprises.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Goncalo Amaral's thesis trashed by SY and PJ
« Reply #168 on: October 26, 2013, 12:04:26 PM »
Relax gilet. There's nothing in the book that wasn't already in the public domain.

 Doesn't matter its putting into print and making it available to a large number of people. Amarals thesis contained ideas like the fridge etc which were not in the public domain

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Goncalo Amaral's thesis trashed by SY and PJ
« Reply #169 on: October 26, 2013, 12:06:55 PM »
Doesn't matter its putting into print and making it available to a large number of people. Amarals thesis contained ideas like the fridge etc which were not in the public domain

Yes they were.

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Goncalo Amaral's thesis trashed by SY and PJ
« Reply #170 on: October 26, 2013, 12:08:04 PM »
But Amaral went much further in his many media appearances and articles

You might be right there, I can't comment on what I didn't see.

But the judge will know everything ?>)()<

Offline Eleanor

Re: Goncalo Amaral's thesis trashed by SY and PJ
« Reply #171 on: October 26, 2013, 12:09:17 PM »
I have yet to read all of the book all these years later, because it contained no surprises.

How can you possibly know this if you haven't read it? Just cherry picking, were you?  This is a major problem.  Pick out the bits that you like and avoid those that you don't.  Some fine Justice.


Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Goncalo Amaral's thesis trashed by SY and PJ
« Reply #172 on: October 26, 2013, 12:14:13 PM »
How can you possibly know this if you haven't read it? Just cherry picking, were you?  This is a major problem.  Pick out the bits that you like and avoid those that you don't.  Some fine Justice.

No surprises for those of us on the forums, I don't mean the wider public. Everything substantial in the book was already known by those discussing the case.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Goncalo Amaral's thesis trashed by SY and PJ
« Reply #173 on: October 26, 2013, 12:17:03 PM »
Which is why he has such a high warning level, obviously.  8(0(*

He spouts unevidenced propaganda masquerading as truth. Only those who are supportive of the McCanns are taken in by it.
Yes and this betrays the role on this forum of certain posters who affect moderation (be nice !) but are here, not to argue in a civilised manner, but to spread disinformation.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Goncalo Amaral's thesis trashed by SY and PJ
« Reply #174 on: October 26, 2013, 12:20:34 PM »
Quite simply amarals thesis has been consigned to the bin where it belongs. if you want proof you will see this over the next few weeks.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Goncalo Amaral's thesis trashed by SY and PJ
« Reply #175 on: October 26, 2013, 12:21:38 PM »
Yes they were.

Which Fridge would that be, the knowledge of which was in the public domain?  The only Fridge that I am aware of is the one that Amaral cited in The Cipriano Case.  You know, the one wherein the blood wasn't tested, even to find out if it was human Blood. let alone that of Joana Cipriano.

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Goncalo Amaral's thesis trashed by SY and PJ
« Reply #176 on: October 26, 2013, 12:25:21 PM »
Quite simply amarals thesis has been consigned to the bin where it belongs. if you want proof you will see this over the next few weeks.

Is this a 'family source' quote? 8)-)))

Offline Benice

Re: Goncalo Amaral's thesis trashed by SY and PJ
« Reply #177 on: October 26, 2013, 12:32:40 PM »
Yes and this betrays the role on this forum of certain posters who affect moderation (be nice !) but are here, not to argue in a civilised manner, but to spread disinformation.

Kindly stop making false accusations against me Anne.  I do not spread disinformation -  my whole reason for being here is because I am opposed to disinformation of any kind.

I am entitled to voice my opinion on this case without you making snide comments just because you don't agree with me.

 
The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline comanche

Re: Goncalo Amaral's thesis trashed by SY and PJ
« Reply #178 on: October 26, 2013, 12:43:27 PM »
Hi Everyone, Followed this sad,tragic  case of Madeleine from day one as I use to work in legal and this interests me and I care. Thrilled PJ have at long last decided to open the case. I feel strongly by reading the files The McCanns are not guilty and know now they definitely should not have left their children. What troubles me after PJ & SY have said The McCanns are not guilty ppl still harp on and try to find myths  that they are, very odd minds.  8@??)(

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Goncalo Amaral's thesis trashed by SY and PJ
« Reply #179 on: October 26, 2013, 12:47:01 PM »

I imagine that the mods/admin on here are keen on making sure that the big increase in visitors here are informed in an unbiased way, i.e. not one favouring the favourable-to-the-mccanns interpretations that have no basis in fact
It is amazing how some posters here only refer to the McCann bible and consider, doing so, that their claims are "evidence". Do they really see it as an objective account of facts ? Or is their unique purpose to brainwash posters thanks to their continuous hammering of the gospel, i.e the "good news" ?
When the fact doesn't exist in the bible, no problem, they extrapolate it according to what they call "common sense" ! That's how they pretend to know better what happened. A pity they can't extend this knowledge to discovering where is Madeleine.